From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: add some more error handling guidelines Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 21:50:06 +0300 Message-ID: <20160822185006.GF4129@mwanda> References: <1471874251-7721-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20160822081617.386db8cd@lwn.net> <20160822174355-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160822174355-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Julia Lawall List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 05:53:02PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > The point is really naming label for the part of init that failed > (and so needs to be skipped), rather than the part that will run. Naming labels after what "needs to be skipped" doesn't work. How does that meaning make sense for err_cgroup in vhost_dev_set_owner()? What needs to be skipped here? regards, dan carpenter