From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 17:59:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20161010165903.GH14561@arm.com> References: <20160927085713.GB3489@arm.com> <20161007042434.jpu7ql3djfo6o6kd@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161007042434.jpu7ql3djfo6o6kd@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 07:24:34AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 09:57:14AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > > In commit 1a937693993f ("virtio: new feature to detect IOMMU device quirk"), > > you added a new feature bit (VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM) to describe whether > > or not a given virtio device requires physical address or bus addresses. > > > > Is there a plan to get this incorporated into the virtio spec [1]? At the > > moment, I can't see a working draft that includes the new bit. Having it > > in the spec would help convince implementors that it's not just a Linux > > thing. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Will > > > > [1] http://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1.0/cs04/virtio-v1.0-cs04.html > > Absolutely. Want to contribute a patch? I could have a look. Is there a git repo for the sources to the working draft? Will