From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] vring: Force use of DMA API for ARM-based systems Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:12:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20170112232931-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <85015f1653eb7e36f992708362b75d1f4391b783.1484070340.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> <4833e705fb6841fbfdbee3b1a21a7bc917292410.1484070340.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> <20170111013046-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20170111100139.GC12388@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170111100139.GC12388@arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Will Deacon Cc: Robin Murphy , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, luto@kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:01:39AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 01:33:31AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 05:51:18PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > > > From: Will Deacon > > > > > > Booting Linux on an ARM fastmodel containing an SMMU emulation results > > > in an unexpected I/O page fault from the legacy virtio-blk PCI device: > > > > > > [ 1.211721] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu: event 0x10 received: > > > [ 1.211800] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu: 0x00000000fffff010 > > > [ 1.211880] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu: 0x0000020800000000 > > > [ 1.211959] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu: 0x00000008fa081002 > > > [ 1.212075] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu: 0x0000000000000000 > > > [ 1.212155] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu: event 0x10 received: > > > [ 1.212234] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu: 0x00000000fffff010 > > > [ 1.212314] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu: 0x0000020800000000 > > > [ 1.212394] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu: 0x00000008fa081000 > > > [ 1.212471] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu: 0x0000000000000000 > > > > > > > > > > > > This is because the virtio-blk is behind an SMMU, so we have consequently > > > swizzled its DMA ops and configured the SMMU to translate accesses. This > > > then requires the vring code to use the DMA API to establish translations, > > > otherwise all transactions will result in fatal faults and termination. > > > > > > Given that ARM-based systems only see an SMMU if one is really present > > > (the topology is all described by firmware tables such as device-tree or > > > IORT), then we can safely use the DMA API for all virtio devices. > > > > > > Cc: Andy Lutomirski > > > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin > > > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon > > > > I'd like to better understand then need for this one. > > Can't the device in question just set VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM ? > > > > I'd rather we avoided need for more hacks and just > > have everyone switch to that. > > There are a couple of problems with VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM: > > 1. It doesn't exist for legacy devices, which are all we have on the > platform in question. > > 2. It's not documented in the virtio sp^H^HSTOP PRESS. I see you applied > my patch ;). Thanks. > > In which case, for non-legacy devices we should definitely be using > VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM, but since this platform hasn't yet moved to the > world of flying cars, could we unconditionally set the DMA ops on ARM > for legacy devices? The alternative is disabling the SMMU altogether, > but that's less than ideal because there are non-virtio devices on the > same PCI bus. > > Will I'd rather people didn't use SMMU with legacy devices. Can't you guys just code up the virtio 1 layout in QEMU? I took a look and it's not a big deal now that two other transports converted, except mmio code in QEMU doesn't use linux header to it's a bit messy. I'll send a patch to clean that up. -- MST