From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio-net: unbreak cusmed packet for small buffer XDP
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 06:31:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170628063033-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69907228-fc1b-175f-f6cd-7ac332e318be@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:45:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年06月28日 10:17, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:14:34AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2017年06月28日 10:02, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 09:54:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > We should allow csumed packet for small buffer, otherwise XDP_PASS
> > > > > won't work correctly.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes commit bb91accf2733 ("virtio-net: XDP support for small buffers")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > The issue would be VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID might be set.
> > > > What do you think?
> > > I think it's safe. For XDP_PASS, it work like in the past.
> > That's the part I don't get. With DATA_VALID csum in packet is wrong, XDP
> > tools assume it's value.
>
> DATA_VALID is CHECKSUM_UNCESSARY on the host, and according to the comment
> in skbuff.h
>
>
> "
> * The hardware you're dealing with doesn't calculate the full checksum
> * (as in CHECKSUM_COMPLETE), but it does parse headers and verify
> checksums
> * for specific protocols. For such packets it will set
> CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY
> * if their checksums are okay. skb->csum is still undefined in this case
> * though. A driver or device must never modify the checksum field in the
> * packet even if checksum is verified.
> "
>
> The csum is correct I believe?
>
> Thanks
That's on input. But I think for tun it's output, where that is equivalent
to CHECKSUM_NONE
> >
> > > For XDP_TX, we
> > > zero the vnet header.
> > Again TX offload is disabled, so packets will go out with an invalid
> > checksum.
> >
> > > For adjusting header, XDP prog should deal with csum.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > That part seems right.
> >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > The patch is needed for -stable.
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 +-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > index 143d8a9..499fcc9 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small(struct net_device *dev,
> > > > > void *orig_data;
> > > > > u32 act;
> > > > > - if (unlikely(hdr->hdr.gso_type || hdr->hdr.flags))
> > > > > + if (unlikely(hdr->hdr.gso_type))
> > > > > goto err_xdp;
> > > > > xdp.data_hard_start = buf + VIRTNET_RX_PAD + vi->hdr_len;
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-28 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-28 1:54 [PATCH net] virtio-net: unbreak cusmed packet for small buffer XDP Jason Wang
2017-06-28 2:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-06-28 2:14 ` Jason Wang
2017-06-28 2:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-06-28 2:45 ` Jason Wang
2017-06-28 3:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2017-06-28 3:40 ` Jason Wang
2017-06-28 4:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-06-28 12:05 ` Jason Wang
2017-07-03 17:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <20170703195752-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
2017-07-04 12:20 ` Jason Wang
2017-07-06 0:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170628063033-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).