virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Performance regression with virtio_net
@ 2017-07-27 17:09 Seth Forshee
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Seth Forshee @ 2017-07-27 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael S. Tsirkin, Jason Wang; +Cc: netdev, virtualization

I'm seeing a performance regression with virtio_net that looks to have
started in 4.12-rc1. I only see it in one context though, downloading
snap packages from the Ubuntu snap store. For example:

 https://api.snapcraft.io/api/v1/snaps/download/b8X2psL1ryVrPt5WEmpYiqfr5emixTd7_1797.snap

which redirects to Internap's CDN. Normally this downloads in a few
seconds at ~10 MB/s, but with 4.12 and 4.13 it takes minutes with a rate
of ~150 KB/s. Everything else I've tried downloads as normal speeds.

I bisected this to 680557cf79f8 "virtio_net: rework mergeable buffer
handling". If I revert this on top of 4.13-rc2 (along with other changes
needed to successfully revert it) speeds return to normal.

Thanks,
Seth

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Performance regression with virtio_net
       [not found] <20170727170942.ub24lwgrl3x2outp@ubuntu-hedt>
@ 2017-07-27 20:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
       [not found] ` <20170727233244-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2017-07-27 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Seth Forshee; +Cc: netdev, virtualization

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:09:42PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> I'm seeing a performance regression with virtio_net that looks to have
> started in 4.12-rc1. I only see it in one context though, downloading
> snap packages from the Ubuntu snap store. For example:
> 
>  https://api.snapcraft.io/api/v1/snaps/download/b8X2psL1ryVrPt5WEmpYiqfr5emixTd7_1797.snap
> 
> which redirects to Internap's CDN. Normally this downloads in a few
> seconds at ~10 MB/s, but with 4.12 and 4.13 it takes minutes with a rate
> of ~150 KB/s. Everything else I've tried downloads as normal speeds.

So just wget that URL should be enough?

> I bisected this to 680557cf79f8 "virtio_net: rework mergeable buffer
> handling". If I revert this on top of 4.13-rc2 (along with other changes
> needed to successfully revert it) speeds return to normal.
> 
> Thanks,
> Seth


Interesting. A more likely suspect would be
e377fcc8486d40867c6c217077ad0fa40977e060 - could you please try
reverting that one instead?
Also, could you please look at mergeable_rx_buffer_size in sysfs with
and without the change?

-- 
MST

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Performance regression with virtio_net
       [not found] ` <20170727233244-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
@ 2017-07-27 21:14   ` Seth Forshee
       [not found]   ` <20170727211430.viki2jcxbzk2u62c@ubuntu-hedt>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Seth Forshee @ 2017-07-27 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: netdev, virtualization

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:38:52PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:09:42PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > I'm seeing a performance regression with virtio_net that looks to have
> > started in 4.12-rc1. I only see it in one context though, downloading
> > snap packages from the Ubuntu snap store. For example:
> > 
> >  https://api.snapcraft.io/api/v1/snaps/download/b8X2psL1ryVrPt5WEmpYiqfr5emixTd7_1797.snap
> > 
> > which redirects to Internap's CDN. Normally this downloads in a few
> > seconds at ~10 MB/s, but with 4.12 and 4.13 it takes minutes with a rate
> > of ~150 KB/s. Everything else I've tried downloads as normal speeds.
> 
> So just wget that URL should be enough?

Yes. Note that sometimes it starts out faster then slows down.

> > I bisected this to 680557cf79f8 "virtio_net: rework mergeable buffer
> > handling". If I revert this on top of 4.13-rc2 (along with other changes
> > needed to successfully revert it) speeds return to normal.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Seth
> 
> 
> Interesting. A more likely suspect would be
> e377fcc8486d40867c6c217077ad0fa40977e060 - could you please try
> reverting that one instead?

I tried it, and I still get slow download speeds. I did test at
680557cf79f82623e2c4fd42733077d60a843513 during the bisect so I'm
reasonably confident that this is the one where things went bad.

> Also, could you please look at mergeable_rx_buffer_size in sysfs with
> and without the change?

In all cases (stock 4.13-rc2, 680557cf79f8 reverted, and e377fcc8486d
reverted) mergeable_rx_buffer_size was 1536.

Thanks,
Seth

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Performance regression with virtio_net
       [not found]   ` <20170727211430.viki2jcxbzk2u62c@ubuntu-hedt>
@ 2017-07-27 21:30     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
  2017-07-28 13:12       ` Seth Forshee
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2017-07-27 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Seth Forshee; +Cc: netdev, virtualization

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 04:14:30PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:38:52PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:09:42PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > > I'm seeing a performance regression with virtio_net that looks to have
> > > started in 4.12-rc1. I only see it in one context though, downloading
> > > snap packages from the Ubuntu snap store. For example:
> > > 
> > >  https://api.snapcraft.io/api/v1/snaps/download/b8X2psL1ryVrPt5WEmpYiqfr5emixTd7_1797.snap
> > > 
> > > which redirects to Internap's CDN. Normally this downloads in a few
> > > seconds at ~10 MB/s, but with 4.12 and 4.13 it takes minutes with a rate
> > > of ~150 KB/s. Everything else I've tried downloads as normal speeds.
> > 
> > So just wget that URL should be enough?
> 
> Yes. Note that sometimes it starts out faster then slows down.
> > > I bisected this to 680557cf79f8 "virtio_net: rework mergeable buffer
> > > handling". If I revert this on top of 4.13-rc2 (along with other changes
> > > needed to successfully revert it) speeds return to normal.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Seth
> > 
> > 
> > Interesting. A more likely suspect would be
> > e377fcc8486d40867c6c217077ad0fa40977e060 - could you please try
> > reverting that one instead?
> 
> I tried it, and I still get slow download speeds. I did test at
> 680557cf79f82623e2c4fd42733077d60a843513 during the bisect so I'm
> reasonably confident that this is the one where things went bad.
> > Also, could you please look at mergeable_rx_buffer_size in sysfs with
> > and without the change?
> 
> In all cases (stock 4.13-rc2, 680557cf79f8 reverted, and e377fcc8486d
> reverted) mergeable_rx_buffer_size was 1536.
> 
> Thanks,
> Seth

Do you see any error counters incrementing after it slows down?

-- 
MST

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Performance regression with virtio_net
  2017-07-27 21:30     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2017-07-28 13:12       ` Seth Forshee
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Seth Forshee @ 2017-07-28 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: netdev, virtualization

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:30:54AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 04:14:30PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:38:52PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:09:42PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > > > I'm seeing a performance regression with virtio_net that looks to have
> > > > started in 4.12-rc1. I only see it in one context though, downloading
> > > > snap packages from the Ubuntu snap store. For example:
> > > > 
> > > >  https://api.snapcraft.io/api/v1/snaps/download/b8X2psL1ryVrPt5WEmpYiqfr5emixTd7_1797.snap
> > > > 
> > > > which redirects to Internap's CDN. Normally this downloads in a few
> > > > seconds at ~10 MB/s, but with 4.12 and 4.13 it takes minutes with a rate
> > > > of ~150 KB/s. Everything else I've tried downloads as normal speeds.
> > > 
> > > So just wget that URL should be enough?
> > 
> > Yes. Note that sometimes it starts out faster then slows down.
> > > > I bisected this to 680557cf79f8 "virtio_net: rework mergeable buffer
> > > > handling". If I revert this on top of 4.13-rc2 (along with other changes
> > > > needed to successfully revert it) speeds return to normal.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Seth
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Interesting. A more likely suspect would be
> > > e377fcc8486d40867c6c217077ad0fa40977e060 - could you please try
> > > reverting that one instead?
> > 
> > I tried it, and I still get slow download speeds. I did test at
> > 680557cf79f82623e2c4fd42733077d60a843513 during the bisect so I'm
> > reasonably confident that this is the one where things went bad.
> > > Also, could you please look at mergeable_rx_buffer_size in sysfs with
> > > and without the change?
> > 
> > In all cases (stock 4.13-rc2, 680557cf79f8 reverted, and e377fcc8486d
> > reverted) mergeable_rx_buffer_size was 1536.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Seth
> 
> Do you see any error counters incrementing after it slows down?

I see rx_dropped and rx_length_errors increasing in lockstep once it
slows down.

Thanks,
Seth

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-28 13:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20170727170942.ub24lwgrl3x2outp@ubuntu-hedt>
2017-07-27 20:38 ` Performance regression with virtio_net Michael S. Tsirkin
     [not found] ` <20170727233244-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
2017-07-27 21:14   ` Seth Forshee
     [not found]   ` <20170727211430.viki2jcxbzk2u62c@ubuntu-hedt>
2017-07-27 21:30     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-07-28 13:12       ` Seth Forshee
2017-07-27 17:09 Seth Forshee

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).