* Performance regression with virtio_net
@ 2017-07-27 17:09 Seth Forshee
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Seth Forshee @ 2017-07-27 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin, Jason Wang; +Cc: netdev, virtualization
I'm seeing a performance regression with virtio_net that looks to have
started in 4.12-rc1. I only see it in one context though, downloading
snap packages from the Ubuntu snap store. For example:
https://api.snapcraft.io/api/v1/snaps/download/b8X2psL1ryVrPt5WEmpYiqfr5emixTd7_1797.snap
which redirects to Internap's CDN. Normally this downloads in a few
seconds at ~10 MB/s, but with 4.12 and 4.13 it takes minutes with a rate
of ~150 KB/s. Everything else I've tried downloads as normal speeds.
I bisected this to 680557cf79f8 "virtio_net: rework mergeable buffer
handling". If I revert this on top of 4.13-rc2 (along with other changes
needed to successfully revert it) speeds return to normal.
Thanks,
Seth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Performance regression with virtio_net
[not found] <20170727170942.ub24lwgrl3x2outp@ubuntu-hedt>
@ 2017-07-27 20:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <20170727233244-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2017-07-27 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Seth Forshee; +Cc: netdev, virtualization
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:09:42PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> I'm seeing a performance regression with virtio_net that looks to have
> started in 4.12-rc1. I only see it in one context though, downloading
> snap packages from the Ubuntu snap store. For example:
>
> https://api.snapcraft.io/api/v1/snaps/download/b8X2psL1ryVrPt5WEmpYiqfr5emixTd7_1797.snap
>
> which redirects to Internap's CDN. Normally this downloads in a few
> seconds at ~10 MB/s, but with 4.12 and 4.13 it takes minutes with a rate
> of ~150 KB/s. Everything else I've tried downloads as normal speeds.
So just wget that URL should be enough?
> I bisected this to 680557cf79f8 "virtio_net: rework mergeable buffer
> handling". If I revert this on top of 4.13-rc2 (along with other changes
> needed to successfully revert it) speeds return to normal.
>
> Thanks,
> Seth
Interesting. A more likely suspect would be
e377fcc8486d40867c6c217077ad0fa40977e060 - could you please try
reverting that one instead?
Also, could you please look at mergeable_rx_buffer_size in sysfs with
and without the change?
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Performance regression with virtio_net
[not found] ` <20170727233244-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
@ 2017-07-27 21:14 ` Seth Forshee
[not found] ` <20170727211430.viki2jcxbzk2u62c@ubuntu-hedt>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Seth Forshee @ 2017-07-27 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: netdev, virtualization
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:38:52PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:09:42PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > I'm seeing a performance regression with virtio_net that looks to have
> > started in 4.12-rc1. I only see it in one context though, downloading
> > snap packages from the Ubuntu snap store. For example:
> >
> > https://api.snapcraft.io/api/v1/snaps/download/b8X2psL1ryVrPt5WEmpYiqfr5emixTd7_1797.snap
> >
> > which redirects to Internap's CDN. Normally this downloads in a few
> > seconds at ~10 MB/s, but with 4.12 and 4.13 it takes minutes with a rate
> > of ~150 KB/s. Everything else I've tried downloads as normal speeds.
>
> So just wget that URL should be enough?
Yes. Note that sometimes it starts out faster then slows down.
> > I bisected this to 680557cf79f8 "virtio_net: rework mergeable buffer
> > handling". If I revert this on top of 4.13-rc2 (along with other changes
> > needed to successfully revert it) speeds return to normal.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Seth
>
>
> Interesting. A more likely suspect would be
> e377fcc8486d40867c6c217077ad0fa40977e060 - could you please try
> reverting that one instead?
I tried it, and I still get slow download speeds. I did test at
680557cf79f82623e2c4fd42733077d60a843513 during the bisect so I'm
reasonably confident that this is the one where things went bad.
> Also, could you please look at mergeable_rx_buffer_size in sysfs with
> and without the change?
In all cases (stock 4.13-rc2, 680557cf79f8 reverted, and e377fcc8486d
reverted) mergeable_rx_buffer_size was 1536.
Thanks,
Seth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Performance regression with virtio_net
[not found] ` <20170727211430.viki2jcxbzk2u62c@ubuntu-hedt>
@ 2017-07-27 21:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-07-28 13:12 ` Seth Forshee
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2017-07-27 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Seth Forshee; +Cc: netdev, virtualization
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 04:14:30PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:38:52PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:09:42PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > > I'm seeing a performance regression with virtio_net that looks to have
> > > started in 4.12-rc1. I only see it in one context though, downloading
> > > snap packages from the Ubuntu snap store. For example:
> > >
> > > https://api.snapcraft.io/api/v1/snaps/download/b8X2psL1ryVrPt5WEmpYiqfr5emixTd7_1797.snap
> > >
> > > which redirects to Internap's CDN. Normally this downloads in a few
> > > seconds at ~10 MB/s, but with 4.12 and 4.13 it takes minutes with a rate
> > > of ~150 KB/s. Everything else I've tried downloads as normal speeds.
> >
> > So just wget that URL should be enough?
>
> Yes. Note that sometimes it starts out faster then slows down.
> > > I bisected this to 680557cf79f8 "virtio_net: rework mergeable buffer
> > > handling". If I revert this on top of 4.13-rc2 (along with other changes
> > > needed to successfully revert it) speeds return to normal.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Seth
> >
> >
> > Interesting. A more likely suspect would be
> > e377fcc8486d40867c6c217077ad0fa40977e060 - could you please try
> > reverting that one instead?
>
> I tried it, and I still get slow download speeds. I did test at
> 680557cf79f82623e2c4fd42733077d60a843513 during the bisect so I'm
> reasonably confident that this is the one where things went bad.
> > Also, could you please look at mergeable_rx_buffer_size in sysfs with
> > and without the change?
>
> In all cases (stock 4.13-rc2, 680557cf79f8 reverted, and e377fcc8486d
> reverted) mergeable_rx_buffer_size was 1536.
>
> Thanks,
> Seth
Do you see any error counters incrementing after it slows down?
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Performance regression with virtio_net
2017-07-27 21:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2017-07-28 13:12 ` Seth Forshee
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Seth Forshee @ 2017-07-28 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: netdev, virtualization
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:30:54AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 04:14:30PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:38:52PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:09:42PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > > > I'm seeing a performance regression with virtio_net that looks to have
> > > > started in 4.12-rc1. I only see it in one context though, downloading
> > > > snap packages from the Ubuntu snap store. For example:
> > > >
> > > > https://api.snapcraft.io/api/v1/snaps/download/b8X2psL1ryVrPt5WEmpYiqfr5emixTd7_1797.snap
> > > >
> > > > which redirects to Internap's CDN. Normally this downloads in a few
> > > > seconds at ~10 MB/s, but with 4.12 and 4.13 it takes minutes with a rate
> > > > of ~150 KB/s. Everything else I've tried downloads as normal speeds.
> > >
> > > So just wget that URL should be enough?
> >
> > Yes. Note that sometimes it starts out faster then slows down.
> > > > I bisected this to 680557cf79f8 "virtio_net: rework mergeable buffer
> > > > handling". If I revert this on top of 4.13-rc2 (along with other changes
> > > > needed to successfully revert it) speeds return to normal.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Seth
> > >
> > >
> > > Interesting. A more likely suspect would be
> > > e377fcc8486d40867c6c217077ad0fa40977e060 - could you please try
> > > reverting that one instead?
> >
> > I tried it, and I still get slow download speeds. I did test at
> > 680557cf79f82623e2c4fd42733077d60a843513 during the bisect so I'm
> > reasonably confident that this is the one where things went bad.
> > > Also, could you please look at mergeable_rx_buffer_size in sysfs with
> > > and without the change?
> >
> > In all cases (stock 4.13-rc2, 680557cf79f8 reverted, and e377fcc8486d
> > reverted) mergeable_rx_buffer_size was 1536.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Seth
>
> Do you see any error counters incrementing after it slows down?
I see rx_dropped and rx_length_errors increasing in lockstep once it
slows down.
Thanks,
Seth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-28 13:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20170727170942.ub24lwgrl3x2outp@ubuntu-hedt>
2017-07-27 20:38 ` Performance regression with virtio_net Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <20170727233244-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
2017-07-27 21:14 ` Seth Forshee
[not found] ` <20170727211430.viki2jcxbzk2u62c@ubuntu-hedt>
2017-07-27 21:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-07-28 13:12 ` Seth Forshee
2017-07-27 17:09 Seth Forshee
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).