From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: weiping zhang <zwp10758@gmail.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_mmio: add cleanup for virtio_mmio_probe
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 11:24:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171204112455.33dad9c2.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171201175140.GA19140@localhost.didichuxing.com>
On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 01:51:40 +0800
weiping zhang <zwp10758@gmail.com> wrote:
> cleanup all resource allocated by virtio_mmio_probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping@didichuxing.com>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> index 74dc717..3fd0e66 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> @@ -513,8 +513,10 @@ static int virtio_mmio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -EBUSY;
>
> vm_dev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*vm_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!vm_dev)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!vm_dev) {
> + rc = -ENOMEM;
Touching this would be a good time to remove the extra space in front
of the -ENOMEM :)
> + goto free_mem;
> + }
>
> vm_dev->vdev.dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> vm_dev->vdev.dev.release = virtio_mmio_release_dev_empty;
(...)
> @@ -573,7 +580,18 @@ static int virtio_mmio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, vm_dev);
>
> - return register_virtio_device(&vm_dev->vdev);
> + rc = register_virtio_device(&vm_dev->vdev);
> + if (rc)
> + goto unmap;
> + return 0;
> +unmap:
> + iounmap(vm_dev->base);
> +free_mem:
> + devm_release_mem_region(&pdev->dev, mem->start,
> + resource_size(mem));
> +free_vmdev:
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, vm_dev);
I think this is problematic as vm_dev embeds a struct device (via
embedding a struct virtio_device). I think the right way to do this is
- call this only if register_virtio_device() has not been called
- put the devm_kfree() into the ->release callback for the
virtio_device (IOW, replace virtio_mmio_release_dev_empty() with a
function that calls this)
- do a put_device() if register_virtio_device() failed
I might be missing some interaction between the usual driver model
handling and devm resources, though.
> + return rc;
> }
>
> static int virtio_mmio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-04 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-01 17:51 [PATCH] virtio_mmio: add cleanup for virtio_mmio_probe weiping zhang
2017-12-04 10:24 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2017-12-05 1:36 ` weiping zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171204112455.33dad9c2.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zwp10758@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).