From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: weiping zhang <zhangweiping@didichuxing.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] virtio_mmio: add cleanup for virtio_mmio_probe
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 12:11:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171206121153.5f075096.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40b3946d54c4a08b2ce3741f4d27bff99ec2f6c8.1512445595.git.zhangweiping@didichuxing.com>
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 19:57:10 +0800
weiping zhang <zhangweiping@didichuxing.com> wrote:
> As mentioned at drivers/base/core.c:
> /*
> * NOTE: _Never_ directly free @dev after calling this function, even
> * if it returned an error! Always use put_device() to give up the
> * reference initialized in this function instead.
> */
>
> Normal we do cleanup for @vm_dev by contianer_of(@dev), but in this case
> we need release @mem resource from @pdev and vm_dev->base. It make
> @pdev->vm_dev.dev.release() too complicated, so put_device just put the
> reference of register_virtio_device->device_register->device_initialize
> and release all resource in virtio_mmio_probe.
Releasing the resources when unwinding on error can work, but I think
there still are some issues (more below). This is all very tangly
code :(
>
> Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping@didichuxing.com>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> @@ -573,7 +580,20 @@ static int virtio_mmio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, vm_dev);
>
> - return register_virtio_device(&vm_dev->vdev);
> + rc = register_virtio_device(&vm_dev->vdev);
> + if (rc)
> + goto put_dev;
> + return 0;
> +put_dev:
> + put_device(&vm_dev->vdev.dev);
Here you give up the extra reference from device_initialize(), which
may or may not be the last reference (since you don't know if
device_add() had already exposed the struct device to other code that
might have acquired a reference). As the device has an empty release
function, touching the device structure after that is not a real
problem, but...
> +unmap:
> + iounmap(vm_dev->base);
> +free_mem:
> + devm_release_mem_region(&pdev->dev, mem->start,
> + resource_size(mem));
> +free_vmdev:
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, vm_dev);
...unconditionally freeing the device here would be a problem if other
code had acquired a reference above. (Unlikely, but we should try to
get this right.)
> + return rc;
> }
>
> static int virtio_mmio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
So, I think there are basically two ways of doing that:
- Move the cleanup into the currently empty release callback. Then, you
won't need to touch the remove function. The problem with that is
that you can't trigger a cleanup via put_device() if you did not call
register_virtio_device() yet.
- Move just devm_kfree() into the release function. Cleanup the
resources here, do the put_device() last thing if had you called
register_virtio_device() before and devm_kfree() if you didn't.
[Of course, I still might be missing some devm subtility, so other
comments are welcome.]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-06 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-05 11:56 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add cleanup for virtio_mmio driver weiping zhang
2017-12-05 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] virtio_mmio: add cleanup for virtio_mmio_probe weiping zhang
2017-12-06 11:11 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2017-12-06 13:53 ` weiping zhang
2017-12-05 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio_mmio: add cleanup for virtio_mmio_remove weiping zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171206121153.5f075096.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zhangweiping@didichuxing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).