Re: [RFC 2/3] hw/virtio-rdma: VirtIO rdma device

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:20:22 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 02:01:56PM +0300, Yuval Shaia wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/standard-headers/linux/virtio_ids.h b/include/standard-headers/linux/virtio_ids.h
> > index 6d5c3b2d4f..bd2c699450 100644
> > --- a/include/standard-headers/linux/virtio_ids.h
> > +++ b/include/standard-headers/linux/virtio_ids.h
> > @@ -43,5 +43,6 @@
> >  #define VIRTIO_ID_INPUT        18 /* virtio input */
> >  #define VIRTIO_ID_VSOCK        19 /* virtio vsock transport */
> >  #define VIRTIO_ID_CRYPTO       20 /* virtio crypto */
> > +#define VIRTIO_ID_RDMA         26 /* virtio crypto */

I think 26 is already de facto used by virtio-audio(?) and 27 has just
been reserved for virtio-pmem. The next free id seems to be 28.

(Also, the comment is a straight copy-paste :)

> >  
> >  #endif /* _LINUX_VIRTIO_IDS_H */  
> 
> 
> Please reserve an ID with the virtio TC.
> Process:
> - create a github issue
> - post patch with Fixes: tag
> - wait a bit
> - if no comments on either ask for a vote

Agreed, let's reserve an id. There seems to be enough interest in this
device type.