From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>,
Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] s390/airq: use DMA memory for adapter interrupts
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:33:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190612153324.3dc6632c.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190612082127.3fd63091.cohuck@redhat.com>
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 08:21:27 +0200
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 02:32:31 +0200
> Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:19:44 +0200
> > Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:27:21 +0200
> > > Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > > > IMHO the cleanest thing to do at this stage is to check if the
> > > > airq_iv_cache is NULL and fail the allocation if it is (to preserve
> > > > previous behavior).
> > >
> > > That's probably the least invasive fix for now. Did you check whether
> > > any of the other dma pools this series introduces have a similar
> > > problem due to init not failing?
> > >
> >
> > Good question!
> >
> > I did a quick check. virtio_ccw_init() should be OK, because we don't
> > register the driver if allocation fails, so the thing is going to end
> > up dysfunctional as expected.
> >
> > If however cio_dma_pool_init() fails, then we end up with the same
> > problem with airqs, just on the !AIRQ_IV_CACHELINE code path. It can be
> > fixed analogously: make cio_dma_zalloc() fail all allocation if
> > cio_dma_pool_init() failed before.
>
> Ok, makes sense.
v5 is out with the fixes. I have no ack/r-b from you for patch 4. Would
you like to give some, or should I proceed without?
Regards,
Halil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-12 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-06 11:51 [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] s390/mm: force swiotlb for " Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio Halil Pasic
2019-06-11 9:55 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-12 6:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] s390/airq: use DMA memory for adapter interrupts Halil Pasic
2019-06-11 10:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-11 14:27 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-11 16:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-12 0:32 ` Halil Pasic
2019-06-12 6:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-12 13:33 ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2019-06-12 13:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] virtio/s390: use cacheline aligned airq bit vectors Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] virtio/s390: add indirection to indicators access Halil Pasic
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] virtio/s390: use DMA memory for ccw I/O and classic notifiers Halil Pasic
2019-06-11 10:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] virtio/s390: make airq summary indicators DMA Halil Pasic
2019-06-11 10:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-11 10:37 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization Cornelia Huck
2019-06-11 10:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190612153324.3dc6632c.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sebott@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).