From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: fix packed ring event may missing
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 06:53:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191025063511-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191021171004.18729-1-yong.liu@intel.com>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 01:10:04AM +0800, Marvin Liu wrote:
> When callback is delayed, virtio expect that vhost will kick when
> rolling over event offset. Recheck should be taken as used index may
> exceed event offset between status check and driver event update.
>
> However, it is possible that flags was not modified if descriptors are
> chained or in_order feature was negotiated. So flags at event offset
> may not be valid for descriptor's status checking. Fix it by using last
> used index as replacement. Tx queue will be stopped if there's not
> enough freed buffers after recheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
So as I wrote separately, I don't think the patch is correct. And it
doesn't look like it was tested properly. However, I do think
virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed_packed is implemented incorrectly in case of
chained s/g and ring that is close to being full. It's just that
chained only happens on OOM at the moment, so it's hard to trigger.
virtio_ring.c can be hacked to force chained to make it trigger more.
And with napi_tx the default this function is barely used at all.
So it's hard to test, and I think in this area we really should include
info on how patch was tested before applying.
But just theoretically speaking I agree: the trick
virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed_packed is using to check that 3/4 of the
ring has been used just by looking at a single s/g entry can't work
reliably.
We generally really need to scan the ring. How much to scan? If we
want to implement this efficiently, I propose that we track the number
of outstanding bufs. Then # of s/g - # of bufs is the max number of
entries we need to scan. For the common case of a single s/g this will
give exactly 0.
Alternatively, we can just scan the whole ring up to the index using the
standard logic. virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed_packed is rare enough.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index bdc08244a648..a8041e451e9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -1499,9 +1499,6 @@ static bool virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> * counter first before updating event flags.
> */
> virtio_wmb(vq->weak_barriers);
> - } else {
> - used_idx = vq->last_used_idx;
> - wrap_counter = vq->packed.used_wrap_counter;
> }
>
> if (vq->packed.event_flags_shadow == VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE) {
> @@ -1518,7 +1515,9 @@ static bool virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> */
> virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
>
> - if (is_used_desc_packed(vq, used_idx, wrap_counter)) {
> + if (is_used_desc_packed(vq,
> + vq->last_used_idx,
> + vq->packed.used_wrap_counter)) {
> END_USE(vq);
> return false;
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-25 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20191021171004.18729-1-yong.liu@intel.com>
2019-10-22 2:44 ` [PATCH] virtio_ring: fix packed ring event may missing Jason Wang
[not found] ` <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E633D74EF@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2019-10-22 13:05 ` Jason Wang
[not found] ` <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E633DA298@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2019-10-24 3:50 ` Jason Wang
2019-10-27 9:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-10-25 9:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-10-27 9:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-10-25 10:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2019-10-27 9:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-10-27 9:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191025063511-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yong.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).