From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/virtio: Build virtio-iommu as module Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:33:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20200219123335.GI1961@8bytes.org> References: <20200214163827.1606668-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <20200219111604.GH1961@8bytes.org> <20200219114133.GA156984@myrica> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200219114133.GA156984@myrica> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Sender: "iommu" To: Jean-Philippe Brucker Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, virtualization-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:41:33PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > No, I meant Will's changes in 5.6 to make the SMMU drivers modular. This > patch doesn't depend on the x86 enablement patch-set, but there is a small > conflict in Kconfig since they both modify it (locally I have this patch > applied on top of the x86 enablement). Yeah, I noticed the conflict when I applied it and that's why I asked. Thanks for clarifying, the patch is now applied. Regards, Joerg