From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 38/75] x86/sev-es: Add SEV-ES Feature Detection Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 10:39:16 +0200 Message-ID: <20200520083916.GB1457@zn.tnic> References: <20200428151725.31091-1-joro@8bytes.org> <20200428151725.31091-39-joro@8bytes.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200428151725.31091-39-joro@8bytes.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Joerg Roedel Cc: x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Hellstrom , Jiri Slaby , Dan Williams , Tom Lendacky , Juergen Gross , Kees Cook , David Rientjes , Cfir Cohen , Erdem Aktas , Masami Hiramatsu , Mike Stunes , Joerg Roedel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:16:48PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > +bool sev_es_active(void) > +{ > + return !!(sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_ENABLED); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sev_es_active); I don't see this being used in modules anywhere in the patchset. Or am I missing something? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette