From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] crypto: virtio: Fix use-after-free in virtio_crypto_skcipher_finalize_req() Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 05:21:48 -0400 Message-ID: <20200531052126-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20200526031956.1897-3-longpeng2@huawei.com> <20200526141138.8410D207FB@mail.kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200526141138.8410D207FB@mail.kernel.org> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sasha Levin Cc: "Longpeng(Mike)" , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Gonglei , Herbert Xu , Jason Wang , "David S. Miller" , Markus Elfring , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:11:37PM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote: > <20200123101000.GB24255@Red> > References: <20200526031956.1897-3-longpeng2@huawei.com> > <20200123101000.GB24255@Red> > > Hi > > [This is an automated email] > > This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag > fixing commit: dbaf0624ffa5 ("crypto: add virtio-crypto driver"). > > The bot has tested the following trees: v5.6.14, v5.4.42, v4.19.124, v4.14.181. > > v5.6.14: Build OK! > v5.4.42: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > eee1d6fca0a0 ("crypto: virtio - switch to skcipher API") > > v4.19.124: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > eee1d6fca0a0 ("crypto: virtio - switch to skcipher API") > > v4.14.181: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 500e6807ce93 ("crypto: virtio - implement missing support for output IVs") > 67189375bb3a ("crypto: virtio - convert to new crypto engine API") > d0d859bb87ac ("crypto: virtio - Register an algo only if it's supported") > e02b8b43f55a ("crypto: virtio - pr_err() strings should end with newlines") > eee1d6fca0a0 ("crypto: virtio - switch to skcipher API") > > > NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. > > How should we proceed with this patch? Mike could you comment on backporting? > -- > Thanks > Sasha