From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 42/75] x86/sev-es: Setup GHCB based boot #VC handler Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 17:30:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20200604153021.GC2246@zn.tnic> References: <20200428151725.31091-1-joro@8bytes.org> <20200428151725.31091-43-joro@8bytes.org> <20200520192230.GK1457@zn.tnic> <20200604120749.GC30945@8bytes.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200604120749.GC30945@8bytes.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" To: Joerg Roedel Cc: Juergen Gross , Tom Lendacky , Dave Hansen , Mike Stunes , Kees Cook , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Cfir Cohen , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Joerg Roedel , Masami Hiramatsu , Andy Lutomirski , hpa@zytor.com, Erdem Aktas , David Rientjes , Dan Williams , Jiri Slaby List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 02:07:49PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > This are IDT entry points and the names above follow the convention for > them, like e.g. 'page_fault', 'nmi' or 'general_protection'. Should I > still add the verbs or just add a comment explaining what those symbols > are? Hmmkay, I see vc_no_ghcb doing call do_vc_no_ghcb and that's setup in early_idt_setup(). vc_boot_ghcb(), OTOH, is called by do_early_exception() only so that one could be called handle_vc_boot_ghcb(), no? I.e., I don't see it being an IDT entry point. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette