From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Poirier Subject: Re: [RFC 12/12] rpmsg: add a device ID to also bind to the ADSP device Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 10:17:57 -0600 Message-ID: <20200608161757.GA32518@xps15> References: <20200529073722.8184-1-guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com> <20200529073722.8184-13-guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com> <20200604200156.GB26734@xps15> <20200605064659.GC32302@ubuntu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200605064659.GC32302@ubuntu> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org, Pierre-Louis Bossart , Liam Girdwood , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Bjorn Andersson List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:46:59AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Hi Mathieu, > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 02:01:56PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:37:22AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > The ADSP device uses the RPMsg API to connect vhost and VirtIO SOF > > > Audio DSP drivers on KVM host and guest. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski > > > --- > > > drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c > > > index f3bd050..ebe3f19 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c > > > +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c > > > @@ -949,6 +949,7 @@ static void rpmsg_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > > > > > static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = { > > > { VIRTIO_ID_RPMSG, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID }, > > > + { VIRTIO_ID_ADSP, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID }, > > > > I am fine with this patch but won't add an RB because of the (many) checkpatch > > errors. Based on the comment I made on the previous set seeing those was > > unexpected. > > Are you using "--strict?" Sorry, I don't see any checkpatch errors, only warnings. No, plane checkpatch on the rproc-next branch. > Most of them are "over 80 characters" which as we now know is no more an issue, There is a thread discussing the matter but I have not seen a clear resolution yet. > I just haven't updated my tree yet. Most others are really minor IMHO. Maybe one Minor or not, if checkpatch complains then it is important enough to address. I am willing to overlook the lines over 80 characters but everything else needs to be dealt with. Thanks, Mathieu > of them I actually would want to fix - using "help" instead of "---help---" in > Kconfig. What errors are you seeing in your checks? > > Thanks > Guennadi > > > Thanks, > > Mathieu > > > > > { 0 }, > > > }; > > > > > > -- > > > 1.9.3 > > >