From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:21:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20200616142112.2d08ff7d.cohuck@redhat.com> References: <1592224764-1258-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <1592224764-1258-2-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <74b6cf8a-d5a6-e0bf-f1c1-e453af133614@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pierre Morel Cc: Christian Borntraeger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pasic@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:35:19 +0200 Pierre Morel wrote: > On 2020-06-16 08:55, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > > > > On 15.06.20 14:39, Pierre Morel wrote: > >> An architecture protecting the guest memory against unauthorized host > >> access may want to enforce VIRTIO I/O device protection through the > >> use of VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM. > >> > >> Let's give a chance to the architecture to accept or not devices > >> without VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel > > > > > > Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger > > Thanks, > > > > > Shouldnt we maybe add a pr_warn if that happens to help the admins to understand what is going on? > > > > > > Yes, Connie asked for it too, good that you remind it to me, I add it. Yes, please :)