From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Should SEV-ES #VC use IST? (Re: [PATCH] Allow RDTSC and RDTSCP
 from userspace)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:02:15 +0200
Message-ID: <20200623160215.GP4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20200623113007.GH31822@suse.de>
 <20200623114818.GD4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20200623120433.GB14101@suse.de>
 <20200623125201.GG4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20200623134003.GD14101@suse.de>
 <20200623135916.GI4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20200623145344.GA117543@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20200623145914.GF14101@suse.de>
 <20200623152326.GL4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20200623153855.GM14101@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200623153855.GM14101@suse.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/virtualization>,
 <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/>
List-Post: <mailto:virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
 <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
Sender: "Virtualization" <virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Cc: Juergen Gross <JGross@suse.com>, Tom Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>, Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Mike Stunes <mstunes@vmware.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>, Linux Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:38:55PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:23:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > Reliability of that depends on the unwinder, I wouldn't want the guess
> > uwinder to OOPS me by accident.
> 
> It doesn't use the full unwinder, it just assumes that there is a
> pt_regs struct at the top of every kernel stack and walks through them
> until SP points to a user-space stack.
> 
> As long as the assumption that there is a pt_regs struct on top of every
> stack holds, this should be safe. The assumption might be wrong when an
> exception happens during SYSCALL/SYSENTER entry, when the return frame
> is not written by hardware.

The IRQ and SoftIRQ stacks don't have that I think. Only the task and
exception stacks.