From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: introduce xen_vring_use_dma Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 14:44:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20200711144334-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20200624163940-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20200624181026-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20200626110629-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20200701133456.GA23888@infradead.org> <20200701172219-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: jgross@suse.com, Peng Fan , konrad.wilk@oracle.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Christoph Hellwig , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-imx@nxp.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:23:22AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Sorry for the late reply -- a couple of conferences kept me busy. > > > On Wed, 1 Jul 2020, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:34:53AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > Would you be in favor of a more flexible check along the lines of the > > > one proposed in the patch that started this thread: > > > > > > if (xen_vring_use_dma()) > > > return true; > > > > > > > > > xen_vring_use_dma would be implemented so that it returns true when > > > xen_swiotlb is required and false otherwise. > > > > Just to stress - with a patch like this virtio can *still* use DMA API > > if PLATFORM_ACCESS is set. So if DMA API is broken on some platforms > > as you seem to be saying, you guys should fix it before doing something > > like this.. > > Yes, DMA API is broken with some interfaces (specifically: rpmesg and > trusty), but for them PLATFORM_ACCESS is never set. That is why the > errors weren't reported before. Xen special case aside, there is no > problem under normal circumstances. So why not fix DMA API? Then this patch is not needed. > > If you are OK with this patch (after a little bit of clean-up), Peng, > are you OK with sending an update or do you want me to?