From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 63/75] x86/sev-es: Handle #DB Events Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:13:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20200715091337.GI16200@suse.de> References: <20200714120917.11253-1-joro@8bytes.org> <20200714120917.11253-64-joro@8bytes.org> <20200715084752.GD10769@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200715084752.GD10769@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Joerg Roedel , x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Jiri Slaby , Dan Williams , Tom Lendacky , Juergen Gross , Kees Cook , David Rientjes , Cfir Cohen , Erdem Aktas , Masami Hiramatsu , Mike Stunes , Sean Christopherson , Martin Radev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:47:52AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:09:05PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > @@ -1028,6 +1036,16 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_VC_SAFE_STACK(exc_vmm_communication) > > struct ghcb *ghcb; > > > > lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled(); > > + > > + /* > > + * #DB is special and needs to be handled outside of the intrumentation_begin()/end(). > > + * Otherwise the #VC handler could be raised recursivly. > > + */ > > + if (error_code == SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + X86_TRAP_DB) { > > + vc_handle_trap_db(regs); > > + return; > > + } > > + > > instrumentation_begin(); > > Wait what?! That makes no sense what so ever. Then my understanding of intrumentation_begin/end() is wrong, I thought that the kernel will forbid setting breakpoints before instrumentation_begin(), which is necessary here because a break-point in the #VC handler might cause recursive #VC-exceptions when #DB is intercepted. Maybe you can elaborate on why this makes no sense? Regards, Joerg