From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258DBC433DF for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D79ED204EA for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Z+whIEeF" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D79ED204EA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53DD86D2A; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:35:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gfUIO7LZhEEh; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBAC86C06; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DC7C07FF; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00B7C0051 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:35:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F68203C8 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:35:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7KbgScc2hZq6 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:35:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ED7C203B4 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:35:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1598006110; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=a286TBwbZ7ci6RWhKZMWDqKWC78sTVuqH/ttlMVxfUs=; b=Z+whIEeFsJbcZWTC14b1kwV1djiU7QE3/k/MTYSHgu9WuhqsgaFcoOUmQqIzzp55Nc0tqt +JdPHKGFUXjNI5Q8vBZQWYliivKyzHj4ynaBeqK3QS1A8YOWJ/PfNbfNlMmENeFHgk07He JPJh/lRWGKfkImCDkViiVGFEq2N1J/Y= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-144-Gn4EHG4jOouXnffn-SpIAw-1; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 06:35:05 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Gn4EHG4jOouXnffn-SpIAw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4707F18A2241; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:35:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t480s.redhat.com (ovpn-114-87.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.87]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449F960BF1; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:34:55 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v1 3/5] virtio-mem: try to merge system ram resources Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:34:29 +0200 Message-Id: <20200821103431.13481-4-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200821103431.13481-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20200821103431.13481-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Cc: Pankaj Gupta , linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko , Baoquan He , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Wei Yang , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Andrew Morton , Dan Williams X-BeenThere: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux virtualization List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" virtio-mem adds memory in memory block granularity, to be able to remove it in the same granularity again later, and to grow slowly on demand. This, however, results in quite a lot of resources when adding a lot of memory. Resources are effectively stored in a list-based tree. Having a lot of resources not only wastes memory, it also makes traversing that tree more expensive, and makes /proc/iomem explode in size (e.g., requiring kexec-tools to manually merge resources later when e.g., trying to create a kdump header). Before this patch, we get (/proc/iomem) when hotplugging 2G via virtio-mem on x86-64: [...] 100000000-13fffffff : System RAM 140000000-33fffffff : virtio0 140000000-147ffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 148000000-14fffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 150000000-157ffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 158000000-15fffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 160000000-167ffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 168000000-16fffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 170000000-177ffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 178000000-17fffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 180000000-187ffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 188000000-18fffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 190000000-197ffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 198000000-19fffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 1a0000000-1a7ffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 1a8000000-1afffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 1b0000000-1b7ffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 1b8000000-1bfffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 3280000000-32ffffffff : PCI Bus 0000:00 With this patch, we get (/proc/iomem): [...] fffc0000-ffffffff : Reserved 100000000-13fffffff : System RAM 140000000-33fffffff : virtio0 140000000-1bfffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 3280000000-32ffffffff : PCI Bus 0000:00 Of course, with more hotplugged memory, it gets worse. When unplugging memory blocks again, try_remove_memory() (via offline_and_remove_memory()) will properly split the resource up again. Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin Cc: Jason Wang Cc: Pankaj Gupta Cc: Baoquan He Cc: Wei Yang Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c index 834b7c13ef3dc..3aae0f87073a8 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c @@ -407,6 +407,7 @@ static int virtio_mem_mb_add(struct virtio_mem *vm, unsigned long mb_id) { const uint64_t addr = virtio_mem_mb_id_to_phys(mb_id); int nid = vm->nid; + int rc; if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) nid = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(addr); @@ -423,8 +424,17 @@ static int virtio_mem_mb_add(struct virtio_mem *vm, unsigned long mb_id) } dev_dbg(&vm->vdev->dev, "adding memory block: %lu\n", mb_id); - return add_memory_driver_managed(nid, addr, memory_block_size_bytes(), - vm->resource_name); + rc = add_memory_driver_managed(nid, addr, memory_block_size_bytes(), + vm->resource_name); + if (!rc) { + /* + * Try to reduce the number of system ram resources in our + * resource container. The memory removal path will properly + * split them up again. + */ + merge_system_ram_resources(vm->parent_resource); + } + return rc; } /* -- 2.26.2 _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization