From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D952C433E1 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD29422BF3 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="lksoy1ND" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DD29422BF3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76BA87E91; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:01:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NDja1Bczua+6; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C3487DB7; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCAA3C016F; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96EA0C0051 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:01:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B418820F for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:01:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rEyrpApmGgPa for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:01:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ej1-f65.google.com (mail-ej1-f65.google.com [209.85.218.65]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27B9787AC9 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-f65.google.com with SMTP id d11so6352479ejt.13 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 01:01:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=KLXKGCMrEd+HEPdG/6Veb0H0KiwUV4QwzjuW5uI1H7Y=; b=lksoy1NDScckuAYD4sTllL1Iurtev0e+pvnwfQDJMxCxa7JLt2eW5ZALN6jCFFbZwt rnEIqFZ/Kn7iFNQBzR0yn6m4899J5aaMisCuWUNBKBwGamGybczhroFIaIi7M4S6KV5c S+kw8klrcatEGIZexnu+yfdz1Z8LWp5yN2mGP2UZC2fgzT1VNci0x8Xk2e6UkXtkY3Xz tckKKot1hODrYWrRvUV2p46fu3xJLkQSm2MOsm3V+N4oOz00v50T77zCoYVtf5I2MypU G0P7T05k6eFA6lGOrHA5r0uEGiMiQ7ECn6imLPHHN+m6uzMSJMTGSN11V00WRZOer7LJ SfVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=KLXKGCMrEd+HEPdG/6Veb0H0KiwUV4QwzjuW5uI1H7Y=; b=GznI3m9Rd4MJvqZKdf+Bidck0p13WpV11ZAeStGVAu2YQIGdU2wGClEhIKFjnjjV+T y5FlKGxcjnU9TUUFmuA0zQt8UqAoWpK+0fpgU/3x8Pf68Eode89uXEKY/V2J5xeKs9DM 033ocxvbMoOkPKrmA+O5shQeADtxPzIsahENbNTeDvo31+Czuz1ZwBUXc2V3KjBQipEs OMD/cIpprjPXQMGFtdI4ybXJ9avlpqc/jT1tnSI8dvPDwxNoJ6+8YzFiDZNJj2Scgh09 FVJHVGpEJdtJq6Sn8mJ/CYf8BuabtkjqJmBmCQVNs8b4K4RHqzed8hy+va0m0WQf/G/4 i4ow== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53135kt4CceRgcAUtlZ775HQe8pYzmZPHT54EUcv8Gl0m0+YuOA4 T6IhTvxXUpOG/ummDaWIh4Z29A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3u3bRyTUX8lEQynqXU4hAdCiT/PYeb2x0IdTm6vsd6r4sfZTB0YNbGlWTbOWqcKJT0ea+2Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fa15:: with SMTP id lo21mr20503865ejb.42.1598515303348; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 01:01:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from myrica ([2001:1715:4e26:a7e0:116c:c27a:3e7f:5eaf]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i25sm954760edt.1.2020.08.27.01.01.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 01:01:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 10:01:25 +0200 From: Jean-Philippe Brucker To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology Message-ID: <20200827080125.GC3399702@myrica> References: <20200821131540.2801801-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <20200826092542-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200826092542-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, sebastien.boeuf@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com X-BeenThere: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux virtualization List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 09:26:02AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 03:15:34PM +0200, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > Add a topology description to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 > > platforms. > > > > Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for > > virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a > > new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtual topologies in a > > minimal format. However some platforms don't use either ACPI or DT for > > booting (for example microvm), and will need the alternative topology > > description method proposed here. In addition, since the process to get > > a new ACPI table will take a long time, this provides a boot method even > > to ACPI-based platforms, if only temporarily for testing and > > development. > > OK should I park this in next now? Seems appropriate ... Yes that sounds like a good idea. It could uncover new bugs since there is more automated testing happening for x86. Thanks, Jean _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization