From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 5.10] vdpa_sim: fix param validation in vdpasim_get_config()
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:55:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210216135509.46cstmwwobizrjfo@steredhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YCqSCg4gugL/bX8f@kroah.com>
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 04:23:54PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 04:03:21PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:32:19PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 05:25:19PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> > > Commit 65b709586e222fa6ffd4166ac7fdb5d5dad113ee upstream.
>> >
>> > No, this really is not that commit, so please do not say it is.
>>
>> Oops, sorry.
>>
>> >
>> > > Before this patch, if 'offset + len' was equal to
>> > > sizeof(struct virtio_net_config), the entire buffer wasn't filled,
>> > > returning incorrect values to the caller.
>> > >
>> > > Since 'vdpasim->config' type is 'struct virtio_net_config', we can
>> > > safely copy its content under this condition.
>> > >
>> > > Commit 65b709586e22 ("vdpa_sim: add get_config callback in
>> > > vdpasim_dev_attr") unintentionally solved it upstream while
>> > > refactoring vdpa_sim.c to support multiple devices. But we don't want
>> > > to backport it to stable branches as it contains many changes.
>> > >
>> > > Fixes: 2c53d0f64c06 ("vdpasim: vDPA device simulator")
>> > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.10.x
>> > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
>> > > ---
>> > > drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c | 2 +-
>> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
>> > > index 6a90fdb9cbfc..8ca178d7b02f 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
>> > > @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ static void vdpasim_get_config(struct vdpa_device *vdpa, unsigned int offset,
>> > > {
>> > > struct vdpasim *vdpasim = vdpa_to_sim(vdpa);
>> > >
>> > > - if (offset + len < sizeof(struct virtio_net_config))
>> > > + if (offset + len <= sizeof(struct virtio_net_config))
>> > > memcpy(buf, (u8 *)&vdpasim->config + offset, len);
>> > > }
>> >
>> > I'll be glad to take a one-off patch, but why can't we take the real
>> > upstream patch? That is always the better long-term solution, right?
>>
>> Because that patch depends on the following patches merged in v5.11-rc1
>> while refactoring vdpa_sim:
>> f37cbbc65178 vdpa_sim: make 'config' generic and usable for any device type
>> cf1a3b35382c vdpa_sim: store parsed MAC address in a buffer
>> a13b5918fdd0 vdpa_sim: add work_fn in vdpasim_dev_attr
>> 011c35bac5ef vdpa_sim: add supported_features field in vdpasim_dev_attr
>> 2f8f46188805 vdpa_sim: add device id field in vdpasim_dev_attr
>> 6c6e28fe4579 vdpa_sim: add struct vdpasim_dev_attr for device attributes
>> 36a9c3063025 vdpa_sim: rename vdpasim_config_ops variables
>> 423248d60d2b vdpa_sim: remove hard-coded virtq count
>>
>> Maybe we can skip some of them, but IMHO should be less risky to apply only
>> this change.
>>
>> If you want I can try to figure out the minimum sub-set of patches needed
>> for 65b709586e22 ("vdpa_sim: add get_config callback in vdpasim_dev_attr").
>
>The minimum is always nice :)
>
The minimum set, including the patch that fixes the issue, is the
following:
65b709586e22 vdpa_sim: add get_config callback in vdpasim_dev_attr
f37cbbc65178 vdpa_sim: make 'config' generic and usable for any device type
cf1a3b35382c vdpa_sim: store parsed MAC address in a buffer
6c6e28fe4579 vdpa_sim: add struct vdpasim_dev_attr for device attributes
423248d60d2b vdpa_sim: remove hard-coded virtq count
The patches apply fairly cleanly. There are a few contextual differences
due to the lack of the other patches:
$ git backport-diff -u master -r linux-5.10.y..HEAD
Key:
[----] : patches are identical
[####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream patch
[down] : patch is downstream-only
The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, respectively
001/5:[----] [--] 'vdpa_sim: remove hard-coded virtq count'
002/5:[----] [-C] 'vdpa_sim: add struct vdpasim_dev_attr for device attributes'
003/5:[----] [--] 'vdpa_sim: store parsed MAC address in a buffer'
004/5:[----] [-C] 'vdpa_sim: make 'config' generic and usable for any device type'
005/5:[----] [-C] 'vdpa_sim: add get_config callback in vdpasim_dev_attr'
>If it's just too much churn for no good reason, then yes, the one-line
>change above will be ok, but you need to document the heck out of why
>this is not upstream and that it is a one-off thing.
>
Shortly I'll send the series to stable@vger.kernel.org so you can judge
if it's okay or better to resend this patch with a better description.
Thanks
Stefano
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-16 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-11 16:25 [PATCH for 5.10] vdpa_sim: fix param validation in vdpasim_get_config() Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-15 14:32 ` Greg KH
2021-02-15 15:03 ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-15 15:23 ` Greg KH
2021-02-16 13:55 ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2021-02-18 6:39 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210216135509.46cstmwwobizrjfo@steredhat \
--to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=elic@nvidia.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox