From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6ADC433E0 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4752564DA1 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:50:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4752564DA1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184EF6062A; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:50:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bg0cGiIlhE8i; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:50:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4EF6061F; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE9DC000B; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5598FC0001 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:50:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E8886FDE for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:50:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xYMc5qpZWubF for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:50:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59AB686887 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:50:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1614091823; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=M2OsuZx3r6NZflw0QWxaOyg4KYFKBmW4S9BSyB7K63o=; b=fnK7QAP1RubFCwBLd5AtfUm/V/5tl+0PEcAngJSoi9HU1OG2t/YUcTtz1OWEaHa2XcJVpD dNCgs5zn4tistOgsgjGxseDJamXOp6vxdRKR+WXPpqEUNXi8SRG9x8/+2CX7tKRILVTP8Y wQsRvGhZK/diNArU/VzTG/OH4qfRTu0= Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-402-wAZRoLgtMou2yFBAFoedTA-1; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 09:50:21 -0500 X-MC-Unique: wAZRoLgtMou2yFBAFoedTA-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id e13so7442078wrg.4 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 06:50:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=M2OsuZx3r6NZflw0QWxaOyg4KYFKBmW4S9BSyB7K63o=; b=OtlACGUrH/HVMSKV7pKJdBggOVicBljovhfwR+IWKrNtD82K0EEcOOqMTrwN3fg5Qs 4WfggQZBHVe1ZoxBI7zLv5IzKnTsBBtOAgQl8hcxrFe9wINl/d8wewUIsF9SWhTgw5sD X+1/Twvg1XCbFUBwYSVSLlISDcg4Ndmoq6D7UZt8R82oRyYVqoRGf9cXEHfdwq4Eg4qo eF0NWHVLOEOsPPkErKQdtOuNpFX8doGYNhnZ0Nno2H8PUpfZnhOXid+uUpsB/OxM2EAl zMTNvZwB6gtSz2GtX0a2L+t5jf+z4p9dCSzUZVZRm0kPOBWZDrR1Z/X/LSrSyj0RT17n eRpg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532L/jzkJA4Cbi2Zek+QDhJigau0Z+/cAbobDC/Gtr8MJhP0NTzi L5nsuCeJw7fHnaX1Iv2TxzqkfeydbPowr7wfyqVDJ939e/gEVUUqs3KLexz9ytb9fYPvLePERw8 MysjjE7a/J4laWACUZsrnNkf/V5E/BGTGW/0assnlGg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:98c2:: with SMTP id a185mr9344423wme.72.1614091819960; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 06:50:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz9tKk0w/iRNRhb7cnm0SfH7twj8rmJO83bREpU9MxKNF6QINjG5A2hMiz9ZZMxEqXDfAr0og== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:98c2:: with SMTP id a185mr9344394wme.72.1614091819741; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 06:50:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from steredhat (host-79-34-249-199.business.telecomitalia.it. [79.34.249.199]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o15sm2891607wmh.39.2021.02.23.06.50.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 06:50:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:50:16 +0100 From: Stefano Garzarella To: Arseny Krasnov Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/19] virtio/vsock: introduce SOCK_SEQPACKET support Message-ID: <20210223145016.ddavx6fihq4akdim@steredhat> References: <20210218053347.1066159-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> <20210222142311.gekdd7gsm33wglos@steredhat> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210222142311.gekdd7gsm33wglos@steredhat> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=sgarzare@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Andra Paraschiv , kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, stsp2@yandex.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, oxffffaa@gmail.com, Norbert Slusarek , Stefan Hajnoczi , Colin Ian King , Jakub Kicinski , "David S. Miller" , Jorgen Hansen X-BeenThere: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux virtualization List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 03:23:11PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >Hi Arseny, > >On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 08:33:44AM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote: >> This patchset impelements support of SOCK_SEQPACKET for virtio >>transport. >> As SOCK_SEQPACKET guarantees to save record boundaries, so to >>do it, two new packet operations were added: first for start of record >>and second to mark end of record(SEQ_BEGIN and SEQ_END later). Also, >>both operations carries metadata - to maintain boundaries and payload >>integrity. Metadata is introduced by adding special header with two >>fields - message count and message length: >> >> struct virtio_vsock_seq_hdr { >> __le32 msg_cnt; >> __le32 msg_len; >> } __attribute__((packed)); >> >> This header is transmitted as payload of SEQ_BEGIN and SEQ_END >>packets(buffer of second virtio descriptor in chain) in the same way as >>data transmitted in RW packets. Payload was chosen as buffer for this >>header to avoid touching first virtio buffer which carries header of >>packet, because someone could check that size of this buffer is equal >>to size of packet header. To send record, packet with start marker is >>sent first(it's header contains length of record and counter), then >>counter is incremented and all data is sent as usual 'RW' packets and >>finally SEQ_END is sent(it also carries counter of message, which is >>counter of SEQ_BEGIN + 1), also after sedning SEQ_END counter is >>incremented again. On receiver's side, length of record is known from >>packet with start record marker. To check that no packets were dropped >>by transport, counters of two sequential SEQ_BEGIN and SEQ_END are >>checked(counter of SEQ_END must be bigger that counter of SEQ_BEGIN by >>1) and length of data between two markers is compared to length in >>SEQ_BEGIN header. >> Now as packets of one socket are not reordered neither on >>vsock nor on vhost transport layers, such markers allows to restore >>original record on receiver's side. If user's buffer is smaller that >>record length, when all out of size data is dropped. >> Maximum length of datagram is not limited as in stream socket, >>because same credit logic is used. Difference with stream socket is >>that user is not woken up until whole record is received or error >>occurred. Implementation also supports 'MSG_EOR' and 'MSG_TRUNC' flags. >> Tests also implemented. > >I reviewed the first part (af_vsock.c changes), tomorrow I'll review >the rest. That part looks great to me, only found a few minor issues. I revieiwed the rest of it as well, left a few minor comments, but I think we're well on track. I'll take a better look at the specification patch tomorrow. Thanks, Stefano > >In the meantime, however, I'm getting a doubt, especially with regard >to other transports besides virtio. > >Should we hide the begin/end marker sending in the transport? > >I mean, should the transport just provide a seqpacket_enqueue() >callbacl? >Inside it then the transport will send the markers. This is because >some transports might not need to send markers. > >But thinking about it more, they could actually implement stubs for >that calls, if they don't need to send markers. > >So I think for now it's fine since it allows us to reuse a lot of >code, unless someone has some objection. > >Thanks, >Stefano > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization