From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: elic@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vdpa: mandate 1.0 device
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 12:04:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210409115343-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6a4ab68-c958-7266-c67c-142960222b67@redhat.com>
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 12:47:55PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> 在 2021/4/8 下午11:59, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 04:26:48PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > This patch mandates 1.0 for vDPA devices. The goal is to have the
> > > semantic of normative statement in the virtio spec and eliminate the
> > > burden of transitional device for both vDPA bus and vDPA parent.
> > >
> > > uAPI seems fine since all the vDPA parent mandates
> > > VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM which implies 1.0 devices.
> > >
> > > For legacy guests, it can still work since Qemu will mediate when
> > > necessary (e.g doing the endian conversion).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > Hmm. If we do this, don't we still have a problem with
> > legacy drivers which don't ack 1.0?
>
>
> Yes, but it's not something that is introduced in this commit. The legacy
> driver never work ...
My point is this neither fixes or prevents this.
So my suggestion is to finally add ioctls along the lines
of PROTOCOL_FEATURES of vhost-user.
Then that one can have bits for legacy le, legacy be and modern.
BTW I looked at vhost-user and it does not look like that
has a solution for this problem either, right?
>
> > Note 1.0 affects ring endianness which is not mediated in QEMU
> > so QEMU can't pretend to device guest is 1.0.
>
>
> Right, I plan to send patches to do mediation in the Qemu to unbreak legacy
> drivers.
>
> Thanks
I frankly think we'll need PROTOCOL_FEATURES anyway, it's too useful ...
so why not teach drivers about it and be done with it? You can't emulate
legacy on modern in a cross endian situation because of vring
endian-ness ...
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/vdpa.h | 6 ++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/vdpa.h b/include/linux/vdpa.h
> > > index 0fefeb976877..cfde4ec999b4 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/vdpa.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/vdpa.h
> > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/device.h>
> > > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > #include <linux/vhost_iotlb.h>
> > > +#include <uapi/linux/virtio_config.h>
> > > /**
> > > * vDPA callback definition.
> > > @@ -317,6 +318,11 @@ static inline int vdpa_set_features(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u64 features)
> > > {
> > > const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdev->config;
> > > + /* Mandating 1.0 to have semantics of normative statements in
> > > + * the spec. */
> > > + if (!(features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > vdev->features_valid = true;
> > > return ops->set_features(vdev, features);
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-09 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-08 8:26 [RFC PATCH] vdpa: mandate 1.0 device Jason Wang
2021-04-08 15:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-09 4:47 ` Jason Wang
2021-04-09 16:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2021-04-12 6:35 ` Jason Wang
2021-04-12 9:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-12 9:23 ` Jason Wang
2021-04-21 7:41 ` Jason Wang
2021-04-21 8:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-21 8:17 ` Jason Wang
2021-05-11 8:43 ` Jason Wang
2021-05-12 7:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-05-12 9:24 ` Jason Wang
[not found] ` <20210602103025.GA17279@mtl-vdi-166.wap.labs.mlnx>
2021-06-03 7:14 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210409115343-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=elic@nvidia.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).