From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 答复: [PATCH] virtio_net: reduce raw_smp_processor_id() calling in virtnet_xdp_get_sq
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 10:33:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210831103024-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bbf978c3252b4f2ea13ab7ca07d53034@baidu.com>
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 02:09:36AM +0000, Li,Rongqing wrote:
> > -----邮件原件-----
> > 发件人: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > 发送时间: 2021年8月31日 5:10
> > 收件人: Li,Rongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
> > 抄送: netdev@vger.kernel.org; bpf@vger.kernel.org;
> > virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
> > 主题: Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: reduce raw_smp_processor_id() calling in
> > virtnet_xdp_get_sq
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 04:21:35PM +0800, Li RongQing wrote:
> > > smp_processor_id()/raw* will be called once each when not more queues
> > > in virtnet_xdp_get_sq() which is called in non-preemptible context, so
> > > it's safe to call the function
> > > smp_processor_id() once.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
> >
> > commit log should probably explain why it's a good idea to replace
> > raw_smp_processor_id with smp_processor_id in the case of curr_queue_pairs
> > <= nr_cpu_ids.
> >
>
>
> I change it as below, is it ok?
>
> virtio_net: reduce raw_smp_processor_id() calling in virtnet_xdp_get_sq
shorter:
virtio_net: s/raw_smp_processor_id/smp_processor_id/ in virtnet_xdp_get_sq
>
> smp_processor_id() and raw_smp_processor_id() are called once
> each in virtnet_xdp_get_sq(), when curr_queue_pairs <= nr_cpu_ids,
> should be merged
I'd just drop this part.
>
> virtnet_xdp_get_sq() is called in non-preemptible context, so
> it's safe to call the function smp_processor_id(), and keep
> smp_processor_id(), and remove the calling of raw_smp_processor_id(),
> avoid the wrong use virtnet_xdp_get_sq to preemptible context
> in the future
s/avoid.*/this way we'll get a warning if this is ever called in a preemptible context/
>
> -Li
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-31 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1629966095-16341-1-git-send-email-lirongqing@baidu.com>
2021-08-30 21:10 ` [PATCH] virtio_net: reduce raw_smp_processor_id() calling in virtnet_xdp_get_sq Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <bbf978c3252b4f2ea13ab7ca07d53034@baidu.com>
2021-08-31 14:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210831103024-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).