From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com, f.hetzelt@tu-berlin.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, david.kaplan@amd.com,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] virtio_ring: validate used buffer length
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 02:36:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210913023428-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210913055353.35219-10-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 01:53:53PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> This patch validate the used buffer length provided by the device
> before trying to use it. This is done by record the in buffer length
> in a new field in desc_state structure during virtqueue_add(), then we
> can fail the virtqueue_get_buf() when we find the device is trying to
> give us a used buffer length which is greater than the in buffer
> length.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Hmm this was proposed in the past. The overhead here is
not negligeable, so I'd like to know more -
when is it a problem if the used len is too big?
Don't the affected drivers already track the length somewhere
and so can validated it without the extra cost in
virtio core?
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index d2ca0a7365f8..b8374a6144f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@
> struct vring_desc_state_split {
> void *data; /* Data for callback. */
> struct vring_desc *indir_desc; /* Indirect descriptor, if any. */
> + u64 buflen; /* In buffer length */
> };
>
> struct vring_desc_state_packed {
> @@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ struct vring_desc_state_packed {
> struct vring_packed_desc *indir_desc; /* Indirect descriptor, if any. */
> u16 num; /* Descriptor list length. */
> u16 last; /* The last desc state in a list. */
> + u64 buflen; /* In buffer length */
> };
>
> struct vring_desc_extra {
> @@ -490,6 +492,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> unsigned int i, n, avail, descs_used, prev, err_idx;
> int head;
> bool indirect;
> + u64 buflen = 0;
>
> START_USE(vq);
>
> @@ -571,6 +574,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> VRING_DESC_F_NEXT |
> VRING_DESC_F_WRITE,
> indirect);
> + buflen += sg->length;
> }
> }
> /* Last one doesn't continue. */
> @@ -605,6 +609,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
>
> /* Store token and indirect buffer state. */
> vq->split.desc_state[head].data = data;
> + vq->split.desc_state[head].buflen = buflen;
> if (indirect)
> vq->split.desc_state[head].indir_desc = desc;
> else
> @@ -784,6 +789,11 @@ static void *virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> BAD_RING(vq, "id %u is not a head!\n", i);
> return NULL;
> }
> + if (unlikely(*len > vq->split.desc_state[i].buflen)) {
> + BAD_RING(vq, "used len %d is larger than in buflen %lld\n",
> + *len, vq->split.desc_state[i].buflen);
> + return NULL;
> + }
>
> /* detach_buf_split clears data, so grab it now. */
> ret = vq->split.desc_state[i].data;
> @@ -1062,6 +1072,7 @@ static int virtqueue_add_indirect_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> unsigned int i, n, err_idx;
> u16 head, id;
> dma_addr_t addr;
> + u64 buflen = 0;
>
> head = vq->packed.next_avail_idx;
> desc = alloc_indirect_packed(total_sg, gfp);
> @@ -1089,6 +1100,8 @@ static int virtqueue_add_indirect_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> desc[i].addr = cpu_to_le64(addr);
> desc[i].len = cpu_to_le32(sg->length);
> i++;
> + if (n >= out_sgs)
> + buflen += sg->length;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1141,6 +1154,7 @@ static int virtqueue_add_indirect_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> vq->packed.desc_state[id].data = data;
> vq->packed.desc_state[id].indir_desc = desc;
> vq->packed.desc_state[id].last = id;
> + vq->packed.desc_state[id].buflen = buflen;
>
> vq->num_added += 1;
>
> @@ -1176,6 +1190,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> unsigned int i, n, c, descs_used, err_idx;
> __le16 head_flags, flags;
> u16 head, id, prev, curr, avail_used_flags;
> + u64 buflen = 0;
>
> START_USE(vq);
>
> @@ -1250,6 +1265,8 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> 1 << VRING_PACKED_DESC_F_AVAIL |
> 1 << VRING_PACKED_DESC_F_USED;
> }
> + if (n >= out_sgs)
> + buflen += sg->length;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1268,6 +1285,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> vq->packed.desc_state[id].data = data;
> vq->packed.desc_state[id].indir_desc = ctx;
> vq->packed.desc_state[id].last = prev;
> + vq->packed.desc_state[id].buflen = buflen;
>
> /*
> * A driver MUST NOT make the first descriptor in the list
> @@ -1455,6 +1473,11 @@ static void *virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> BAD_RING(vq, "id %u is not a head!\n", id);
> return NULL;
> }
> + if (unlikely(*len > vq->packed.desc_state[id].buflen)) {
> + BAD_RING(vq, "used len %d is larger than in buflen %lld\n",
> + *len, vq->packed.desc_state[id].buflen);
> + return NULL;
> + }
>
> /* detach_buf_packed clears data, so grab it now. */
> ret = vq->packed.desc_state[id].data;
> --
> 2.25.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-13 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-13 5:53 [PATCH 0/9] More virtio hardening Jason Wang
2021-09-13 5:53 ` [PATCH 1/9] virtio-blk: validate num_queues during probe Jason Wang
2021-09-13 7:48 ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-09-14 2:29 ` Jason Wang
2021-09-13 12:05 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-09-13 5:53 ` [PATCH 2/9] virtio: add doc for validate() method Jason Wang
2021-09-13 5:53 ` [PATCH 3/9] virtio-console: switch to use .validate() Jason Wang
2021-09-13 5:53 ` [PATCH 4/9] virtio_console: validate max_nr_ports before trying to use it Jason Wang
2021-09-13 5:53 ` [PATCH 5/9] virtio_config: introduce a new ready method Jason Wang
2021-09-13 5:53 ` [PATCH 6/9] virtio_pci: harden MSI-X interrupts Jason Wang
2021-09-13 6:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-09-13 6:08 ` Jason Wang
2021-09-13 6:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-09-13 6:34 ` Jason Wang
2021-09-13 6:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-09-13 6:43 ` Jason Wang
2021-09-13 7:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-09-13 7:15 ` Jason Wang
2021-09-13 6:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-09-13 7:07 ` Jason Wang
2021-09-13 19:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-13 20:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-09-13 22:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-14 2:20 ` Jason Wang
2021-09-14 8:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-13 5:53 ` [PATCH 7/9] virtio-pci: harden INTX interrupts Jason Wang
2021-09-13 6:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-09-13 6:36 ` Jason Wang
2021-09-13 6:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-09-13 6:45 ` Jason Wang
2021-09-13 7:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-09-13 7:17 ` Jason Wang
2021-09-13 21:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-13 22:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-09-13 22:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-14 2:50 ` Jason Wang
2021-09-14 9:34 ` Boqun Feng
2021-09-14 11:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-14 11:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-13 5:53 ` [PATCH 8/9] virtio_ring: fix typos in vring_desc_extra Jason Wang
2021-09-13 5:53 ` [PATCH 9/9] virtio_ring: validate used buffer length Jason Wang
2021-09-13 6:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2021-09-13 6:40 ` Jason Wang
2021-09-13 6:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-09-13 7:13 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-05 7:42 ` [PATCH 0/9] More virtio hardening Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-11 7:36 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-11 12:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-12 2:43 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-12 5:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-12 6:11 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-12 6:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-12 6:43 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-12 7:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-12 8:46 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210913023428-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
--cc=f.hetzelt@tu-berlin.de \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).