virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: david.kaplan@amd.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
	f.hetzelt@tu-berlin.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/4] virtio_ring: validate used buffer length
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 16:09:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211119160951.5f2294c8.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211027022107.14357-2-jasowang@redhat.com>

On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:21:04 +0800
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:

> This patch validate the used buffer length provided by the device
> before trying to use it. This is done by record the in buffer length
> in a new field in desc_state structure during virtqueue_add(), then we
> can fail the virtqueue_get_buf() when we find the device is trying to
> give us a used buffer length which is greater than the in buffer
> length.
> 
> Since some drivers have already done the validation by themselves,
> this patch tries to makes the core validation optional. For the driver
> that doesn't want the validation, it can set the
> suppress_used_validation to be true (which could be overridden by
> force_used_validation module parameter). To be more efficient, a
> dedicate array is used for storing the validate used length, this
> helps to eliminate the cache stress if validation is done by the
> driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>

Hi Jason!

Our CI has detected, that virtio-vsock became unusable with this
patch on s390x. I didn't test on x86 yet. The guest kernel says
something like:
vmw_vsock_virtio_transport virtio1: tx: used len 44 is larger than in buflen 0

Did you, or anybody else, see something like this on platforms other that
s390x?

I had a quick look at this code, and I speculate that it probably
uncovers a pre-existig bug, rather than introducing a new one.

If somebody is already working on this please reach out to me.

Regards,
Halil
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-19 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-27  2:21 [PATCH V5 0/4] Validate used buffer length Jason Wang
2021-10-27  2:21 ` [PATCH V5 1/4] virtio_ring: validate " Jason Wang
2021-11-02  3:18   ` Xuan Zhuo
2021-11-02  3:54     ` Jason Wang
2021-11-19 15:09   ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2021-11-22  3:51     ` Jason Wang
2021-11-22  5:35       ` Halil Pasic
2021-11-22  5:49         ` Halil Pasic
2021-11-22  6:25           ` Jason Wang
2021-11-22  7:55             ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-11-22 11:08               ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-11-22 14:24                 ` Halil Pasic
2021-11-22 16:23                   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-11-22 13:50             ` Halil Pasic
2021-11-23  2:30               ` Jason Wang
2021-11-23 12:17               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-23 12:43                 ` Halil Pasic
2021-11-22 20:23             ` Halil Pasic
2021-11-23  2:25               ` Jason Wang
2021-11-23 11:05                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-24  1:30                   ` Michael Ellerman
2021-11-24  2:26                     ` Jason Wang
2021-11-24  2:33                       ` Jason Wang
2021-11-24  7:22                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-24  7:59                           ` Jason Wang
2021-11-24  8:24                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-24  8:28                               ` Jason Wang
2021-11-24 11:33                         ` Halil Pasic
2021-11-25  2:27                           ` Jason Wang
2021-11-22  7:42       ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-10-27  2:21 ` [PATCH V5 2/4] virtio-net: don't let virtio core to validate used length Jason Wang
2021-10-27  2:21 ` [PATCH V5 3/4] virtio-blk: " Jason Wang
2021-10-27  2:21 ` [PATCH V5 4/4] virtio-scsi: don't let virtio core to validate used buffer length Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211119160951.5f2294c8.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
    --cc=f.hetzelt@tu-berlin.de \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).