From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: david.kaplan@amd.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
f.hetzelt@tu-berlin.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/4] virtio_ring: validate used buffer length
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 16:09:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211119160951.5f2294c8.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211027022107.14357-2-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:21:04 +0800
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> This patch validate the used buffer length provided by the device
> before trying to use it. This is done by record the in buffer length
> in a new field in desc_state structure during virtqueue_add(), then we
> can fail the virtqueue_get_buf() when we find the device is trying to
> give us a used buffer length which is greater than the in buffer
> length.
>
> Since some drivers have already done the validation by themselves,
> this patch tries to makes the core validation optional. For the driver
> that doesn't want the validation, it can set the
> suppress_used_validation to be true (which could be overridden by
> force_used_validation module parameter). To be more efficient, a
> dedicate array is used for storing the validate used length, this
> helps to eliminate the cache stress if validation is done by the
> driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Hi Jason!
Our CI has detected, that virtio-vsock became unusable with this
patch on s390x. I didn't test on x86 yet. The guest kernel says
something like:
vmw_vsock_virtio_transport virtio1: tx: used len 44 is larger than in buflen 0
Did you, or anybody else, see something like this on platforms other that
s390x?
I had a quick look at this code, and I speculate that it probably
uncovers a pre-existig bug, rather than introducing a new one.
If somebody is already working on this please reach out to me.
Regards,
Halil
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-19 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-27 2:21 [PATCH V5 0/4] Validate used buffer length Jason Wang
2021-10-27 2:21 ` [PATCH V5 1/4] virtio_ring: validate " Jason Wang
2021-11-02 3:18 ` Xuan Zhuo
2021-11-02 3:54 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-19 15:09 ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2021-11-22 3:51 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-22 5:35 ` Halil Pasic
2021-11-22 5:49 ` Halil Pasic
2021-11-22 6:25 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-22 7:55 ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-11-22 11:08 ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-11-22 14:24 ` Halil Pasic
2021-11-22 16:23 ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-11-22 13:50 ` Halil Pasic
2021-11-23 2:30 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-23 12:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-23 12:43 ` Halil Pasic
2021-11-22 20:23 ` Halil Pasic
2021-11-23 2:25 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-23 11:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-24 1:30 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-11-24 2:26 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-24 2:33 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-24 7:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-24 7:59 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-24 8:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-24 8:28 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-24 11:33 ` Halil Pasic
2021-11-25 2:27 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-22 7:42 ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-10-27 2:21 ` [PATCH V5 2/4] virtio-net: don't let virtio core to validate used length Jason Wang
2021-10-27 2:21 ` [PATCH V5 3/4] virtio-blk: " Jason Wang
2021-10-27 2:21 ` [PATCH V5 4/4] virtio-scsi: don't let virtio core to validate used buffer length Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211119160951.5f2294c8.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
--cc=f.hetzelt@tu-berlin.de \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).