From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Wu Zongyong <wuzongyong@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] eni_vdpa: Fix an error handling path in 'eni_vdpa_probe()'
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 02:02:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211125020139-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <131b9250-f338-c931-39e6-ca3c1e3a9b66@wanadoo.fr>
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:34:02AM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 25/11/2021 à 00:58, Michael S. Tsirkin a écrit :
> > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:21:44PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > > Le 09/11/2021 à 03:54, Jason Wang a écrit :
> > > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 3:32 AM Christophe JAILLET
> > > > <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Le 08/11/2021 à 06:55, Jason Wang a écrit :
> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 12:15 AM Christophe JAILLET
> > > > > > <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In the error handling path, a successful 'vp_legacy_probe()' should be
> > > > > > > balanced by a corresponding 'vp_legacy_remove()' call, as already done in
> > > > > > > the remove function.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Add the missing call and update gotos accordingly.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Fixes: e85087beedca ("eni_vdpa: add vDPA driver for Alibaba ENI")
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > drivers/vdpa/alibaba/eni_vdpa.c | 6 ++++--
> > > > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/alibaba/eni_vdpa.c b/drivers/vdpa/alibaba/eni_vdpa.c
> > > > > > > index 3f788794571a..12b3db6b4517 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/alibaba/eni_vdpa.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/alibaba/eni_vdpa.c
> > > > > > > @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static int eni_vdpa_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> > > > > > > if (!eni_vdpa->vring) {
> > > > > > > ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > > > > > ENI_ERR(pdev, "failed to allocate virtqueues\n");
> > > > > > > - goto err;
> > > > > > > + goto err_remove_vp_legacy;
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > for (i = 0; i < eni_vdpa->queues; i++) {
> > > > > > > @@ -513,11 +513,13 @@ static int eni_vdpa_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> > > > > > > ret = vdpa_register_device(&eni_vdpa->vdpa, eni_vdpa->queues);
> > > > > > > if (ret) {
> > > > > > > ENI_ERR(pdev, "failed to register to vdpa bus\n");
> > > > > > > - goto err;
> > > > > > > + goto err_remove_vp_legacy;
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > return 0;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +err_remove_vp_legacy:
> > > > > > > + vp_legacy_remove(&eni_vdpa->ldev);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Won't vp_legacy_remove() be triggered by the put_devic() below?
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi, I'm sorry but i don't see how.
> > > > >
> > > > > My understanding is that:
> > > > > - on "put_device(&eni_vdpa->vdpa.dev);", the corresponding release
> > > > > function will be called.
> > > > >
> > > > > - This release function is the one recorded in the
> > > > > '__vdpa_alloc_device()' function.
> > > > >
> > > > > - So it should be 'vdpa_release_dev()'.
> > > > >
> > > > > - This function, AFAIU, has no knowledge of 'vp_legacy_remove()' or
> > > > > anything that could call it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Unless I misread something or miss something obvious, I don't see how
> > > > > 'vp_legacy_remove() would be called.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you elaborate?
> > > >
> > > > I think the device should release the driver (see
> > > > device_release_driver()) during during its deleting.
> > >
> > > Hi, I still don't follow the logic and I don't understand how
> > > 'vp_legacy_remove()' will finely be called, but it is not that important.
> > >
> > > If it's fine for you, it's fine for me :)
> > >
> > > CJ
> >
> > So pls post just patch 2?
>
> Patch 2/2 should apply cleanly with or without patch 1/2.
> Do I really need to send a v2 just for dropping the first patch? :/
>
> CJ
It is preferable, yes. A patch in isolation is not the same as a patch
in the series.
> >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > CJ
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > err:
> > > > > > > put_device(&eni_vdpa->vdpa.dev);
> > > > > > > return ret;
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > 2.30.2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Virtualization mailing list
> > > > Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
> > > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
> > > >
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-25 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <f6b2d087ca3840604b4e711a208d35b5d6285cb4.1636301587.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
2021-11-08 5:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] eni_vdpa: Fix an error handling path in 'eni_vdpa_probe()' Jason Wang
[not found] ` <393fb7b7-653b-eae6-16bd-5ffc7d600619@wanadoo.fr>
2021-11-09 2:54 ` Jason Wang
[not found] ` <069ed3fb-ef99-ff36-136d-a0221ba85a96@wanadoo.fr>
2021-11-24 23:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <131b9250-f338-c931-39e6-ca3c1e3a9b66@wanadoo.fr>
2021-11-25 7:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
[not found] ` <02045bdcbbb25f79bae4827f66029cfcddc90381.1636301587.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
2021-11-09 2:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] eni_vdpa: Simplify 'eni_vdpa_probe()' Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211125020139-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wuzongyong@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).