Re: [PATCH net] virtio-net: enable big mode correctly

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 03:28:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:26 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 03:20:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:15 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 03:11:58PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:00 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 02:05:47PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > When VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature is not negotiated, we assume a very
> > > > > > > large max_mtu. In this case, using small packet mode is not correct
> > > > > > > since it may breaks the networking when MTU is grater than
> > > > > > > ETH_DATA_LEN.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > To have a quick fix, simply enable the big packet mode when
> > > > > > > VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is not negotiated.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This will slow down dpdk hosts which disable mergeable buffers
> > > > > > and send standard MTU sized packets.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > We can do optimization on top.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't think it works like this, increasing mtu
> > > > > > from guest >4k never worked,
> > > > >
> > > > > Looking at add_recvbuf_small() it's actually GOOD_PACKET_LEN if I was not wrong.
> > > >
> > > > OK, even more so then.
> > > >
> > > > > > we can't regress everyone's
> > > > > > performance with a promise to maybe sometime bring it back.
> > > > >
> > > > > So consider it never work before I wonder if we can assume a 1500 as
> > > > > max_mtu value instead of simply using MAX_MTU?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > You want to block guests from setting MTU to a value >GOOD_PACKET_LEN?
> > >
> > > Yes, or fix the issue to let large packets on RX work (e.g as the TODO
> > > said, size the buffer: for <=4K mtu continue to work as
> > > add_recvbuf_small(), for >= 4K switch to use big).
> >
> > Right. The difficulty is with changing modes, current code isn't
> > designed for it.
> 
> I think it might work if we reset the device during the mode change.
> 
> Thanks

For sure. It's hard to do without races though, and we need to
carefully restore all the programming done so far.
Maybe it will be easier if we do something like disable_irq
to reliably suppress interrupts from hardware.

> >
> > > > Maybe ... it will prevent sending large packets which did work ...
> > >
> > > Yes, but it's strange to allow TX but not RX
> > >
> > > > I'd tread carefully here, and I don't think this kind of thing is net
> > > > material.
> > >
> > > I agree consider it can't be fixed easily.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Reported-by: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
> > > > > > > Cc: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 7 ++++---
> > > > > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > > > index 7c43bfc1ce44..83ae3ef5eb11 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > > > @@ -3200,11 +3200,12 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > > > > >               dev->mtu = mtu;
> > > > > > >               dev->max_mtu = mtu;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -             /* TODO: size buffers correctly in this case. */
> > > > > > > -             if (dev->mtu > ETH_DATA_LEN)
> > > > > > > -                     vi->big_packets = true;
> > > > > > >       }
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +     /* TODO: size buffers correctly in this case. */
> > > > > > > +     if (dev->max_mtu > ETH_DATA_LEN)
> > > > > > > +             vi->big_packets = true;
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > >       if (vi->any_header_sg)
> > > > > > >               dev->needed_headroom = vi->hdr_len;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization