* Re: [PATCH V4 1/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement IO read/write helpers in the header file
[not found] ` <20220203072735.189716-2-lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
@ 2022-02-14 6:15 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2022-02-14 6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhu Lingshan, mst; +Cc: netdev, virtualization
在 2022/2/3 下午3:27, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
> re-implement IO read/write helpers in the header file, so that
> they can be utilized among modules.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
I wonder if we can simply use include/linux/virtio_pci_modern.h.
The accessors vp_ioreadX/writeX() there were decoupled from the
virtio_pci_modern_device structure.
Thanks
> ---
> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c | 36 --------------------------------
> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> index 7d41dfe48ade..397692ae671c 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> @@ -10,42 +10,6 @@
>
> #include "ifcvf_base.h"
>
> -static inline u8 ifc_ioread8(u8 __iomem *addr)
> -{
> - return ioread8(addr);
> -}
> -static inline u16 ifc_ioread16 (__le16 __iomem *addr)
> -{
> - return ioread16(addr);
> -}
> -
> -static inline u32 ifc_ioread32(__le32 __iomem *addr)
> -{
> - return ioread32(addr);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void ifc_iowrite8(u8 value, u8 __iomem *addr)
> -{
> - iowrite8(value, addr);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void ifc_iowrite16(u16 value, __le16 __iomem *addr)
> -{
> - iowrite16(value, addr);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void ifc_iowrite32(u32 value, __le32 __iomem *addr)
> -{
> - iowrite32(value, addr);
> -}
> -
> -static void ifc_iowrite64_twopart(u64 val,
> - __le32 __iomem *lo, __le32 __iomem *hi)
> -{
> - ifc_iowrite32((u32)val, lo);
> - ifc_iowrite32(val >> 32, hi);
> -}
> -
> struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> {
> return container_of(hw, struct ifcvf_adapter, vf);
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> index c486873f370a..949b4fb9d554 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,43 @@
> #define ifcvf_private_to_vf(adapter) \
> (&((struct ifcvf_adapter *)adapter)->vf)
>
> +static inline u8 ifc_ioread8(u8 __iomem *addr)
> +{
> + return ioread8(addr);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u16 ifc_ioread16(__le16 __iomem *addr)
> +{
> + return ioread16(addr);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 ifc_ioread32(__le32 __iomem *addr)
> +{
> + return ioread32(addr);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ifc_iowrite8(u8 value, u8 __iomem *addr)
> +{
> + iowrite8(value, addr);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ifc_iowrite16(u16 value, __le16 __iomem *addr)
> +{
> + iowrite16(value, addr);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ifc_iowrite32(u32 value, __le32 __iomem *addr)
> +{
> + iowrite32(value, addr);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ifc_iowrite64_twopart(u64 val,
> + __le32 __iomem *lo, __le32 __iomem *hi)
> +{
> + ifc_iowrite32((u32)val, lo);
> + ifc_iowrite32(val >> 32, hi);
> +}
> +
> struct vring_info {
> u64 desc;
> u64 avail;
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 2/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement device MSIX vector allocator
[not found] ` <20220203072735.189716-3-lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
@ 2022-02-14 6:26 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2022-02-14 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhu Lingshan, mst; +Cc: netdev, virtualization
在 2022/2/3 下午3:27, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
> This commit implements a MSIX vector allocation helper
> for vqs and config interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> index d1a6b5ab543c..44c89ab0b6da 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> @@ -58,14 +58,45 @@ static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
> }
>
> +/* ifcvf MSIX vectors allocator, this helper tries to allocate
> + * vectors for all virtqueues and the config interrupt.
> + * It returns the number of allocated vectors, negative
> + * return value when fails.
> + */
> +static int ifcvf_alloc_vectors(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> + int max_intr, ret;
> +
> + /* all queues and config interrupt */
> + max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
> + ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, max_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX | PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY);
> +
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to alloc IRQ vectors\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (ret < max_intr)
> + IFCVF_INFO(pdev,
> + "Requested %u vectors, however only %u allocated, lower performance\n",
> + max_intr, ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> - int vector, i, ret, irq;
> + int vector, nvectors, i, ret, irq;
> u16 max_intr;
>
> - /* all queues and config interrupt */
> + nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
> + if (!(nvectors > 0))
> + return nvectors;
Why not simply checking by using nvectors <= 0? If ifcvf_alloc_vectors
can return 0 this breaks the ifcvf_request_irq() caller's assumption.
> +
> max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
>
> ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, max_intr,
So irq is allocated twice here?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 3/4] vhost_vdpa: don't setup irq offloading when irq_num < 0
[not found] ` <20220203072735.189716-4-lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
@ 2022-02-14 6:28 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2022-02-14 6:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhu Lingshan, mst; +Cc: netdev, virtualization
在 2022/2/3 下午3:27, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
> When irq number is negative(e.g., -EINVAL), the virtqueue
> may be disabled or the virtqueues are sharing a device irq.
> In such case, we should not setup irq offloading for a virtqueue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> index 851539807bc9..c4fcacb0de3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> @@ -96,6 +96,10 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u16 qid)
> if (!ops->get_vq_irq)
> return;
>
> + irq = ops->get_vq_irq(vdpa, qid);
> + if (irq < 0)
> + return;
> +
> irq = ops->get_vq_irq(vdpa, qid);
So the get_vq_irq() will be called twice?
> irq_bypass_unregister_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
> if (!vq->call_ctx.ctx || irq < 0)
We're already checked irq against 0 here.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement shared IRQ feature
[not found] ` <20220203072735.189716-5-lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
@ 2022-02-14 7:19 ` Jason Wang
2022-02-14 10:01 ` Zhu Lingshan
2022-02-14 14:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2022-02-14 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhu Lingshan, mst; +Cc: netdev, virtualization
在 2022/2/3 下午3:27, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
> On some platforms/devices, there may not be enough MSI vector
> slots allocated for virtqueues and config changes. In such a case,
> the interrupt sources(virtqueues, config changes) must share
> an IRQ/vector, to avoid initialization failures, keep
> the device functional.
>
> This commit handles three cases:
> (1) number of the allocated vectors == the number of virtqueues + 1
> (config changes), every virtqueue and the config interrupt has
> a separated vector/IRQ, the best and the most likely case.
> (2) number of the allocated vectors is less than the best case, but
> greater than 1. In this case, all virtqueues share a vector/IRQ,
> the config interrupt has a separated vector/IRQ
> (3) only one vector is allocated, in this case, the virtqueues and
> the config interrupt share a vector/IRQ. The worst and most
> unlikely case.
>
> Otherwise, it needs to fail.
>
> This commit introduces some helper functions:
> ifcvf_set_vq_vector() and ifcvf_set_config_vector() sets virtqueue
> vector and config vector in the device config space, so that
> the device can send interrupt DMA.
>
> This commit adds some fields in struct ifcvf_hw and re-placed
> the existed fields to be aligned with the cacheline.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c | 47 ++++--
> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 23 ++-
> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 243 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> index 397692ae671c..18dcb63ab1e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,36 @@ struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> return container_of(hw, struct ifcvf_adapter, vf);
> }
>
> +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector)
> +{
> + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> +
> + ifc_iowrite16(qid, &cfg->queue_select);
> + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for queue %u\n", qid);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
Let's leave this check for the caller, E.g can caller try to assign
NO_VECTOR during uni-nit?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector)
> +{
> + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> +
> + cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->msix_config);
> + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
Similar question as above.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void __iomem *get_cap_addr(struct ifcvf_hw *hw,
> struct virtio_pci_cap *cap)
> {
> @@ -140,6 +170,8 @@ int ifcvf_init_hw(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, struct pci_dev *pdev)
> hw->common_cfg, hw->notify_base, hw->isr,
> hw->dev_cfg, hw->notify_off_multiplier);
>
> + hw->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -321,12 +353,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
>
> ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> - ifc_iowrite16(IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF, &cfg->msix_config);
> -
> - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
>
> for (i = 0; i < hw->nr_vring; i++) {
> if (!hw->vring[i].ready)
> @@ -340,15 +366,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> ifc_iowrite64_twopart(hw->vring[i].used, &cfg->queue_used_lo,
> &cfg->queue_used_hi);
> ifc_iowrite16(hw->vring[i].size, &cfg->queue_size);
> - ifc_iowrite16(i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> -
> - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) ==
> - VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev,
> - "No msix vector for queue %u\n", i);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> ifcvf_set_vq_state(hw, i, hw->vring[i].last_avail_idx);
> ifc_iowrite16(1, &cfg->queue_enable);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> index 949b4fb9d554..9cfe088c82e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@
>
> #define IFCVF_QUEUE_ALIGNMENT PAGE_SIZE
> #define IFCVF_QUEUE_MAX 32768
> -#define IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF 0
> -#define IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF 1
> #define IFCVF_PCI_MAX_RESOURCE 6
>
> #define IFCVF_LM_CFG_SIZE 0x40
> @@ -42,6 +40,13 @@
> #define ifcvf_private_to_vf(adapter) \
> (&((struct ifcvf_adapter *)adapter)->vf)
>
> +/* all vqs and config interrupt has its own vector */
> +#define MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG 1
> +/* all vqs share a vector, and config interrupt has a separate vector */
> +#define MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG 2
> +/* all vqs and config interrupt share a vector */
> +#define MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED 3
I think there's no much value to differ 2 from 3 consider config
interrupt should be rare.
> +
> static inline u8 ifc_ioread8(u8 __iomem *addr)
> {
> return ioread8(addr);
> @@ -97,25 +102,27 @@ struct ifcvf_hw {
> u8 __iomem *isr;
> /* Live migration */
> u8 __iomem *lm_cfg;
> - u16 nr_vring;
Any reason for moving nv_vring, config_size, and other stuffs?
> /* Notification bar number */
> u8 notify_bar;
> + u8 msix_vector_status;
> + /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
> + u32 config_size;
> /* Notificaiton bar address */
> void __iomem *notify_base;
> phys_addr_t notify_base_pa;
> u32 notify_off_multiplier;
> + u32 dev_type;
> u64 req_features;
> u64 hw_features;
> - u32 dev_type;
> struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *common_cfg;
> void __iomem *dev_cfg;
> struct vring_info vring[IFCVF_MAX_QUEUES];
> void __iomem * const *base;
> char config_msix_name[256];
> struct vdpa_callback config_cb;
> - unsigned int config_irq;
> - /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
> - u32 config_size;
> + int config_irq;
> + int vqs_shared_irq;
> + u16 nr_vring;
> };
>
> struct ifcvf_adapter {
> @@ -160,4 +167,6 @@ int ifcvf_set_vq_state(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, u16 num);
> struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> int ifcvf_probed_virtio_net(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> u32 ifcvf_get_config_size(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector);
> +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector);
> #endif /* _IFCVF_H_ */
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> index 44c89ab0b6da..ca414399f040 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Intel Corporation"
> #define IFCVF_DRIVER_NAME "ifcvf"
>
> +/* handles config interrupt */
This seems unrelated to the shared IRQ logic and it looks useless since
it's easily to deduce it from the function name below.
> static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq, void *arg)
> {
> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> @@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq, void *arg)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> +/* handles vqs interrupt */
So did this.
> static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> {
> struct vring_info *vring = arg;
> @@ -37,24 +39,78 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> +/* handls vqs shared interrupt */
> +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> +{
> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> + struct vring_info *vring;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> + vring = &vf->vring[i];
> + if (vring->cb.callback)
> + vf->vring->cb.callback(vring->cb.private);
> + }
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +/* handles a shared interrupt for vqs and config */
> +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> +{
> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> + u8 isr;
> +
> + isr = ifc_ioread8(vf->isr);
We need to exactly what vp_interrupt do here. Checking against vf->isr
first and return IRQ_NONE if it is not set.
Always return IRQ_HANDLED will break the device who shares an irq with
IFCVF.
> + if (isr & VIRTIO_PCI_ISR_CONFIG)
> + ifcvf_config_changed(irq, arg);
> +
> + return ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(irq, arg);
> +}
> +
> static void ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(void *data)
> {
> pci_free_irq_vectors(data);
> }
>
> -static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> +static void ifcvf_free_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> int i;
>
> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG) {
> + for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
> + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> + }
> + } else {
> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vqs_shared_irq, vf);
> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +}
>
> - for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
> - vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> +static void ifcvf_free_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> +
> + /* If the irq is shared by all vqs and the config interrupt,
> + * it is already freed in ifcvf_free_vq_irq, so here only
> + * need to free config irq when msix_vector_status != MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED
> + */
> + if (vf->msix_vector_status != MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED) {
> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
> + vf->config_irq = -EINVAL;
> }
> +}
> +
> +static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>
> - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
> + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, queues);
> + ifcvf_free_config_irq(adapter);
> ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
> }
>
> @@ -86,58 +142,172 @@ static int ifcvf_alloc_vectors(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> +static int ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> - int vector, nvectors, i, ret, irq;
> - u16 max_intr;
> + int i, vector, ret, irq;
>
> - nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
> - if (!(nvectors > 0))
> - return nvectors;
> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> + snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n", pci_name(pdev), i);
> + vector = i;
> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> + ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
> + vf->vring[i].msix_name,
> + &vf->vring[i]);
> + if (ret) {
> + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
> + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, i);
> + } else {
> + vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
> + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> + }
> + }
>
> - max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> +
> + vector = 0;
> + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared vqs interrupt name */
I think we can remove this comment since the code is straightforward.
> + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-vqs-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev));
> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> + ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler, 0,
> + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
> + if (ret) {
> + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
> +
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +}
> +
> +static int ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> +
> + vector = 0;
> + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared device interrupt name */
> + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-dev-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev));
> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> + ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler, 0,
> + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
> + if (ret) {
> + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
>
> - ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, max_intr,
> - max_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to alloc IRQ vectors\n");
> return ret;
> }
>
> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> + }
> +
> + vf->config_irq = irq;
> + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, vector);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +}
> +
> +static int ifcvf_request_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> +{
> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> + ret = ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(adapter);
> + else
> + ret = ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(adapter);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int ifcvf_request_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> + int config_vector, ret;
> +
> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> + /* vector 0 ~ vf->nr_vring for vqs, num vf->nr_vring vector for config interrupt */
> + config_vector = vf->nr_vring;
> +
> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> + /* vector 0 for vqs and 1 for config interrupt */
> + config_vector = 1;
> +
> snprintf(vf->config_msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-config\n",
> pci_name(pdev));
> - vector = 0;
> - vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> + vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, config_vector);
> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq,
> ifcvf_config_changed, 0,
> vf->config_msix_name, vf);
> if (ret) {
> IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request config irq\n");
> + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, vf->nr_vring);
> return ret;
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> - snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n",
> - pci_name(pdev), i);
> - vector = i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF;
> - irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> - ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
> - vf->vring[i].msix_name,
> - &vf->vring[i]);
> - if (ret) {
> - IFCVF_ERR(pdev,
> - "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
> - ifcvf_free_irq(adapter, i);
> + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, config_vector);
>
> - return ret;
> - }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> +{
As replied above, I think having two modes should be sufficient and the
code could be greatly simplified.
Thanks
> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> + int nvectors, ret, max_intr;
>
> - vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
> + nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
> + if (!(nvectors > 0))
> + return nvectors;
> +
> + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
> + max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
> + if (nvectors < max_intr)
> + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
> +
> + if (nvectors == 1) {
> + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED;
> + ret = ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(adapter);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> + ret = ifcvf_request_vq_irq(adapter);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = ifcvf_request_config_irq(adapter);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -441,7 +611,10 @@ static int ifcvf_vdpa_get_vq_irq(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
> {
> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev);
>
> - return vf->vring[qid].irq;
> + if (vf->vqs_shared_irq < 0)
> + return vf->vring[qid].irq;
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> static struct vdpa_notification_area ifcvf_get_vq_notification(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement shared IRQ feature
2022-02-14 7:19 ` [PATCH V4 4/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement shared IRQ feature Jason Wang
@ 2022-02-14 10:01 ` Zhu Lingshan
2022-02-14 14:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-02-14 14:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Zhu Lingshan @ 2022-02-14 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang, Zhu Lingshan, mst; +Cc: netdev, virtualization
On 2/14/2022 3:19 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> 在 2022/2/3 下午3:27, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
>> On some platforms/devices, there may not be enough MSI vector
>> slots allocated for virtqueues and config changes. In such a case,
>> the interrupt sources(virtqueues, config changes) must share
>> an IRQ/vector, to avoid initialization failures, keep
>> the device functional.
>>
>> This commit handles three cases:
>> (1) number of the allocated vectors == the number of virtqueues + 1
>> (config changes), every virtqueue and the config interrupt has
>> a separated vector/IRQ, the best and the most likely case.
>> (2) number of the allocated vectors is less than the best case, but
>> greater than 1. In this case, all virtqueues share a vector/IRQ,
>> the config interrupt has a separated vector/IRQ
>> (3) only one vector is allocated, in this case, the virtqueues and
>> the config interrupt share a vector/IRQ. The worst and most
>> unlikely case.
>>
>> Otherwise, it needs to fail.
>>
>> This commit introduces some helper functions:
>> ifcvf_set_vq_vector() and ifcvf_set_config_vector() sets virtqueue
>> vector and config vector in the device config space, so that
>> the device can send interrupt DMA.
>>
>> This commit adds some fields in struct ifcvf_hw and re-placed
>> the existed fields to be aligned with the cacheline.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c | 47 ++++--
>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 23 ++-
>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 243 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 3 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
>> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
>> index 397692ae671c..18dcb63ab1e3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,36 @@ struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct
>> ifcvf_hw *hw)
>> return container_of(hw, struct ifcvf_adapter, vf);
>> }
>> +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector)
>> +{
>> + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
>> + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
>> +
>> + ifc_iowrite16(qid, &cfg->queue_select);
>> + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
>> + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) ==
>> VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
>> + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for queue %u\n", qid);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
>
> Let's leave this check for the caller, E.g can caller try to assign
> NO_VECTOR during uni-nit?
ifcvf driver sets NO_VECTOR when call hw_disable(). I am not sure
whether I get it,
Yes we can let the caller check a vq vector, however this may cause more
than three levels brackets, may looks ugly.
>
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector)
>> +{
>> + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
>> + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
>> +
>> + cfg = hw->common_cfg;
>> + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->msix_config);
>> + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
>> + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
>
> Similar question as above.
>
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void __iomem *get_cap_addr(struct ifcvf_hw *hw,
>> struct virtio_pci_cap *cap)
>> {
>> @@ -140,6 +170,8 @@ int ifcvf_init_hw(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, struct
>> pci_dev *pdev)
>> hw->common_cfg, hw->notify_base, hw->isr,
>> hw->dev_cfg, hw->notify_off_multiplier);
>> + hw->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -321,12 +353,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
>> ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
>> cfg = hw->common_cfg;
>> - ifc_iowrite16(IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF, &cfg->msix_config);
>> -
>> - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
>> - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> for (i = 0; i < hw->nr_vring; i++) {
>> if (!hw->vring[i].ready)
>> @@ -340,15 +366,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
>> ifc_iowrite64_twopart(hw->vring[i].used, &cfg->queue_used_lo,
>> &cfg->queue_used_hi);
>> ifc_iowrite16(hw->vring[i].size, &cfg->queue_size);
>> - ifc_iowrite16(i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF,
>> &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
>> -
>> - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) ==
>> - VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
>> - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev,
>> - "No msix vector for queue %u\n", i);
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> -
>> ifcvf_set_vq_state(hw, i, hw->vring[i].last_avail_idx);
>> ifc_iowrite16(1, &cfg->queue_enable);
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
>> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
>> index 949b4fb9d554..9cfe088c82e9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
>> @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@
>> #define IFCVF_QUEUE_ALIGNMENT PAGE_SIZE
>> #define IFCVF_QUEUE_MAX 32768
>> -#define IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF 0
>> -#define IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF 1
>> #define IFCVF_PCI_MAX_RESOURCE 6
>> #define IFCVF_LM_CFG_SIZE 0x40
>> @@ -42,6 +40,13 @@
>> #define ifcvf_private_to_vf(adapter) \
>> (&((struct ifcvf_adapter *)adapter)->vf)
>> +/* all vqs and config interrupt has its own vector */
>> +#define MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG 1
>> +/* all vqs share a vector, and config interrupt has a separate
>> vector */
>> +#define MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG 2
>> +/* all vqs and config interrupt share a vector */
>> +#define MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED 3
>
>
> I think there's no much value to differ 2 from 3 consider config
> interrupt should be rare.
IMHO we still need 2 and 3, because MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG
means there are at least 2 vectors,
the vqs share one vector, config change has its own vector.
MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED means three are only one vector, all vqs and
config changes need to share this vector.
>
>
>
>> +
>> static inline u8 ifc_ioread8(u8 __iomem *addr)
>> {
>> return ioread8(addr);
>> @@ -97,25 +102,27 @@ struct ifcvf_hw {
>> u8 __iomem *isr;
>> /* Live migration */
>> u8 __iomem *lm_cfg;
>> - u16 nr_vring;
>
>
> Any reason for moving nv_vring, config_size, and other stuffs?
for cacheline alignment.
>
>
>
>> /* Notification bar number */
>> u8 notify_bar;
>> + u8 msix_vector_status;
>> + /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
>> + u32 config_size;
>> /* Notificaiton bar address */
>> void __iomem *notify_base;
>> phys_addr_t notify_base_pa;
>> u32 notify_off_multiplier;
>> + u32 dev_type;
>> u64 req_features;
>> u64 hw_features;
>> - u32 dev_type;
>> struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *common_cfg;
>> void __iomem *dev_cfg;
>> struct vring_info vring[IFCVF_MAX_QUEUES];
>> void __iomem * const *base;
>> char config_msix_name[256];
>> struct vdpa_callback config_cb;
>> - unsigned int config_irq;
>> - /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
>> - u32 config_size;
>> + int config_irq;
>> + int vqs_shared_irq;
>> + u16 nr_vring;
>> };
>> struct ifcvf_adapter {
>> @@ -160,4 +167,6 @@ int ifcvf_set_vq_state(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16
>> qid, u16 num);
>> struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
>> int ifcvf_probed_virtio_net(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
>> u32 ifcvf_get_config_size(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
>> +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector);
>> +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector);
>> #endif /* _IFCVF_H_ */
>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
>> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
>> index 44c89ab0b6da..ca414399f040 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>> #define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Intel Corporation"
>> #define IFCVF_DRIVER_NAME "ifcvf"
>> +/* handles config interrupt */
>
>
> This seems unrelated to the shared IRQ logic and it looks useless
> since it's easily to deduce it from the function name below.
OK, do you mean the comments? I can remove these comments.
>
>
>> static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq, void *arg)
>> {
>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
>> @@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq,
>> void *arg)
>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> }
>> +/* handles vqs interrupt */
>
>
> So did this.
>
>
>> static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
>> {
>> struct vring_info *vring = arg;
>> @@ -37,24 +39,78 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq,
>> void *arg)
>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> }
>> +/* handls vqs shared interrupt */
>> +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
>> +{
>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
>> + struct vring_info *vring;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
>> + vring = &vf->vring[i];
>> + if (vring->cb.callback)
>> + vf->vring->cb.callback(vring->cb.private);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* handles a shared interrupt for vqs and config */
>> +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
>> +{
>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
>> + u8 isr;
>> +
>> + isr = ifc_ioread8(vf->isr);
>
>
> We need to exactly what vp_interrupt do here. Checking against vf->isr
> first and return IRQ_NONE if it is not set.
>
> Always return IRQ_HANDLED will break the device who shares an irq with
> IFCVF.
as we discussed in another thread(spec inconsistency about ISR), ISR may
only works for INTx for now,
but VFs don't have INTx, and a VF may not share its vectors with other
devices, so I guess it can work
and may be our best try for now.
>
>
>> + if (isr & VIRTIO_PCI_ISR_CONFIG)
>> + ifcvf_config_changed(irq, arg);
>> +
>> + return ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(irq, arg);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(void *data)
>> {
>> pci_free_irq_vectors(data);
>> }
>> -static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
>> +static void ifcvf_free_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int
>> queues)
>> {
>> struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>> int i;
>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
>> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
>> + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vqs_shared_irq, vf);
>> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +}
>> - for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
>> - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
>> - vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
>> +static void ifcvf_free_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>> +
>> + /* If the irq is shared by all vqs and the config interrupt,
>> + * it is already freed in ifcvf_free_vq_irq, so here only
>> + * need to free config irq when msix_vector_status !=
>> MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED
>> + */
>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status != MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED) {
>> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
>> + vf->config_irq = -EINVAL;
>> }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>> - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
>> + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, queues);
>> + ifcvf_free_config_irq(adapter);
>> ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
>> }
>> @@ -86,58 +142,172 @@ static int ifcvf_alloc_vectors(struct
>> ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>> return ret;
>> }
>> -static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>> +static int ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>> {
>> struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>> - int vector, nvectors, i, ret, irq;
>> - u16 max_intr;
>> + int i, vector, ret, irq;
>> - nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
>> - if (!(nvectors > 0))
>> - return nvectors;
>> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
>> + snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n",
>> pci_name(pdev), i);
>> + vector = i;
>> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
>> + ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
>> + vf->vring[i].msix_name,
>> + &vf->vring[i]);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
>> + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, i);
>> + } else {
>> + vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
>> + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
>> + }
>> + }
>> - max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
>> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>> + int i, vector, ret, irq;
>> +
>> + vector = 0;
>> + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared vqs
>> interrupt name */
>
>
> I think we can remove this comment since the code is straightforward.
sure
>
>
>> + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-vqs-shared-irq\n",
>> pci_name(pdev));
>> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
>> + ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler, 0,
>> + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
>> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
>> + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
>> + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>> + int i, vector, ret, irq;
>> +
>> + vector = 0;
>> + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared device
>> interrupt name */
>> + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256,
>> "ifcvf[%s]-dev-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev));
>> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
>> + ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler, 0,
>> + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
>> - ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, max_intr,
>> - max_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
>> - if (ret < 0) {
>> - IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to alloc IRQ vectors\n");
>> return ret;
>> }
>> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
>> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
>> + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
>> + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
>> + }
>> +
>> + vf->config_irq = irq;
>> + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, vector);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ifcvf_request_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>> +{
>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
>> + ret = ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(adapter);
>> + else
>> + ret = ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(adapter);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ifcvf_request_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>> + int config_vector, ret;
>> +
>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
>> + /* vector 0 ~ vf->nr_vring for vqs, num vf->nr_vring vector
>> for config interrupt */
>> + config_vector = vf->nr_vring;
>> +
>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
>> + /* vector 0 for vqs and 1 for config interrupt */
>> + config_vector = 1;
>> +
>> snprintf(vf->config_msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-config\n",
>> pci_name(pdev));
>> - vector = 0;
>> - vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
>> + vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, config_vector);
>> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq,
>> ifcvf_config_changed, 0,
>> vf->config_msix_name, vf);
>> if (ret) {
>> IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request config irq\n");
>> + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, vf->nr_vring);
>> return ret;
>> }
>> - for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
>> - snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n",
>> - pci_name(pdev), i);
>> - vector = i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF;
>> - irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
>> - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
>> - ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
>> - vf->vring[i].msix_name,
>> - &vf->vring[i]);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - IFCVF_ERR(pdev,
>> - "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
>> - ifcvf_free_irq(adapter, i);
>> + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, config_vector);
>> - return ret;
>> - }
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>> +{
>
>
> As replied above, I think having two modes should be sufficient and
> the code could be greatly simplified.
Do you mean if we don't get enough vectors, just use only one vector for
the vqs and config changes? I guess this
only works if ISR work for MSIX as we expects, or we may waste some time
in the device config space.
Thanks,
Zhu Lingshan
>
> Thanks
>
>
>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>> + int nvectors, ret, max_intr;
>> - vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
>> + nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
>> + if (!(nvectors > 0))
>> + return nvectors;
>> +
>> + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
>> + max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
>> + if (nvectors < max_intr)
>> + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
>> +
>> + if (nvectors == 1) {
>> + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED;
>> + ret = ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(adapter);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> }
>> + ret = ifcvf_request_vq_irq(adapter);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = ifcvf_request_config_irq(adapter);
>> +
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -441,7 +611,10 @@ static int ifcvf_vdpa_get_vq_irq(struct
>> vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
>> {
>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev);
>> - return vf->vring[qid].irq;
>> + if (vf->vqs_shared_irq < 0)
>> + return vf->vring[qid].irq;
>> + else
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> static struct vdpa_notification_area
>> ifcvf_get_vq_notification(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
>
> _______________________________________________
> Virtualization mailing list
> Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement shared IRQ feature
2022-02-14 7:19 ` [PATCH V4 4/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement shared IRQ feature Jason Wang
2022-02-14 10:01 ` Zhu Lingshan
@ 2022-02-14 14:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-02-15 3:34 ` Jason Wang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2022-02-14 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang; +Cc: netdev, Zhu Lingshan, virtualization
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 03:19:25PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> 在 2022/2/3 下午3:27, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
> > On some platforms/devices, there may not be enough MSI vector
> > slots allocated for virtqueues and config changes. In such a case,
> > the interrupt sources(virtqueues, config changes) must share
> > an IRQ/vector, to avoid initialization failures, keep
> > the device functional.
> >
> > This commit handles three cases:
> > (1) number of the allocated vectors == the number of virtqueues + 1
> > (config changes), every virtqueue and the config interrupt has
> > a separated vector/IRQ, the best and the most likely case.
> > (2) number of the allocated vectors is less than the best case, but
> > greater than 1. In this case, all virtqueues share a vector/IRQ,
> > the config interrupt has a separated vector/IRQ
> > (3) only one vector is allocated, in this case, the virtqueues and
> > the config interrupt share a vector/IRQ. The worst and most
> > unlikely case.
> >
> > Otherwise, it needs to fail.
> >
> > This commit introduces some helper functions:
> > ifcvf_set_vq_vector() and ifcvf_set_config_vector() sets virtqueue
> > vector and config vector in the device config space, so that
> > the device can send interrupt DMA.
> >
> > This commit adds some fields in struct ifcvf_hw and re-placed
> > the existed fields to be aligned with the cacheline.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c | 47 ++++--
> > drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 23 ++-
> > drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 243 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 3 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> > index 397692ae671c..18dcb63ab1e3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> > @@ -15,6 +15,36 @@ struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> > return container_of(hw, struct ifcvf_adapter, vf);
> > }
> > +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector)
> > +{
> > + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> > + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> > +
> > + ifc_iowrite16(qid, &cfg->queue_select);
> > + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> > + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> > + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for queue %u\n", qid);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
>
> Let's leave this check for the caller, E.g can caller try to assign
> NO_VECTOR during uni-nit?
Hmm I'm not sure I agree. Caller will have to write queue select
again, and that's an extra IO, which is a waste.
And having function checking itself just seems better contained.
>
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector)
> > +{
> > + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> > + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> > +
> > + cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> > + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->msix_config);
> > + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> > + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
>
> Similar question as above.
>
>
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void __iomem *get_cap_addr(struct ifcvf_hw *hw,
> > struct virtio_pci_cap *cap)
> > {
> > @@ -140,6 +170,8 @@ int ifcvf_init_hw(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > hw->common_cfg, hw->notify_base, hw->isr,
> > hw->dev_cfg, hw->notify_off_multiplier);
> > + hw->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -321,12 +353,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> > ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> > cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> > - ifc_iowrite16(IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF, &cfg->msix_config);
> > -
> > - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> > - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > for (i = 0; i < hw->nr_vring; i++) {
> > if (!hw->vring[i].ready)
> > @@ -340,15 +366,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> > ifc_iowrite64_twopart(hw->vring[i].used, &cfg->queue_used_lo,
> > &cfg->queue_used_hi);
> > ifc_iowrite16(hw->vring[i].size, &cfg->queue_size);
> > - ifc_iowrite16(i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> > -
> > - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) ==
> > - VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> > - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev,
> > - "No msix vector for queue %u\n", i);
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > -
> > ifcvf_set_vq_state(hw, i, hw->vring[i].last_avail_idx);
> > ifc_iowrite16(1, &cfg->queue_enable);
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> > index 949b4fb9d554..9cfe088c82e9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> > @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@
> > #define IFCVF_QUEUE_ALIGNMENT PAGE_SIZE
> > #define IFCVF_QUEUE_MAX 32768
> > -#define IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF 0
> > -#define IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF 1
> > #define IFCVF_PCI_MAX_RESOURCE 6
> > #define IFCVF_LM_CFG_SIZE 0x40
> > @@ -42,6 +40,13 @@
> > #define ifcvf_private_to_vf(adapter) \
> > (&((struct ifcvf_adapter *)adapter)->vf)
> > +/* all vqs and config interrupt has its own vector */
> > +#define MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG 1
> > +/* all vqs share a vector, and config interrupt has a separate vector */
> > +#define MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG 2
> > +/* all vqs and config interrupt share a vector */
> > +#define MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED 3
>
>
> I think there's no much value to differ 2 from 3 consider config interrupt
> should be rare.
Yes but if we do not have a dedicated vector then we need an
extra device IO (in fact, a read) on each interrupt.
>
> > +
> > static inline u8 ifc_ioread8(u8 __iomem *addr)
> > {
> > return ioread8(addr);
> > @@ -97,25 +102,27 @@ struct ifcvf_hw {
> > u8 __iomem *isr;
> > /* Live migration */
> > u8 __iomem *lm_cfg;
> > - u16 nr_vring;
>
>
> Any reason for moving nv_vring, config_size, and other stuffs?
>
>
> > /* Notification bar number */
> > u8 notify_bar;
> > + u8 msix_vector_status;
> > + /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
> > + u32 config_size;
> > /* Notificaiton bar address */
> > void __iomem *notify_base;
> > phys_addr_t notify_base_pa;
> > u32 notify_off_multiplier;
> > + u32 dev_type;
> > u64 req_features;
> > u64 hw_features;
> > - u32 dev_type;
> > struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *common_cfg;
> > void __iomem *dev_cfg;
> > struct vring_info vring[IFCVF_MAX_QUEUES];
> > void __iomem * const *base;
> > char config_msix_name[256];
> > struct vdpa_callback config_cb;
> > - unsigned int config_irq;
> > - /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
> > - u32 config_size;
> > + int config_irq;
> > + int vqs_shared_irq;
> > + u16 nr_vring;
> > };
> > struct ifcvf_adapter {
> > @@ -160,4 +167,6 @@ int ifcvf_set_vq_state(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, u16 num);
> > struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> > int ifcvf_probed_virtio_net(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> > u32 ifcvf_get_config_size(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> > +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector);
> > +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector);
> > #endif /* _IFCVF_H_ */
> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> > index 44c89ab0b6da..ca414399f040 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > #define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Intel Corporation"
> > #define IFCVF_DRIVER_NAME "ifcvf"
> > +/* handles config interrupt */
>
>
> This seems unrelated to the shared IRQ logic and it looks useless since it's
> easily to deduce it from the function name below.
>
>
> > static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq, void *arg)
> > {
> > struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> > @@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq, void *arg)
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> > +/* handles vqs interrupt */
>
>
> So did this.
>
>
> > static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> > {
> > struct vring_info *vring = arg;
> > @@ -37,24 +39,78 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> > +/* handls vqs shared interrupt */
> > +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> > +{
> > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> > + struct vring_info *vring;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > + vring = &vf->vring[i];
> > + if (vring->cb.callback)
> > + vf->vring->cb.callback(vring->cb.private);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* handles a shared interrupt for vqs and config */
> > +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
shared is not a good name given IRQ_SHARED is not set.
maybe "common"? "reused"?
> > +{
> > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> > + u8 isr;
> > +
> > + isr = ifc_ioread8(vf->isr);
>
>
> We need to exactly what vp_interrupt do here. Checking against vf->isr first
> and return IRQ_NONE if it is not set.
no, vf->isr is not set for VQ interrupts. If need to actually poke
at the VQ to know.
> Always return IRQ_HANDLED will break the device who shares an irq with
> IFCVF.
It's a MSI, not INT#. So interrupt is not shared as such - it's only
sharing vector between config and vq.
>
> > + if (isr & VIRTIO_PCI_ISR_CONFIG)
> > + ifcvf_config_changed(irq, arg);
> > +
> > + return ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(irq, arg);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(void *data)
> > {
> > pci_free_irq_vectors(data);
> > }
> > -static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> > +static void ifcvf_free_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> > {
> > struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > int i;
> > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> > + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
> > + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vqs_shared_irq, vf);
> > + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +}
> > - for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> > - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
> > - vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> > +static void ifcvf_free_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > +
> > + /* If the irq is shared by all vqs and the config interrupt,
> > + * it is already freed in ifcvf_free_vq_irq, so here only
> > + * need to free config irq when msix_vector_status != MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED
> > + */
> > + if (vf->msix_vector_status != MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED) {
> > + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
> > + vf->config_irq = -EINVAL;
> > }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
> > + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, queues);
> > + ifcvf_free_config_irq(adapter);
> > ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
> > }
> > @@ -86,58 +142,172 @@ static int ifcvf_alloc_vectors(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > return ret;
> > }
> > -static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > +static int ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > {
> > struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > - int vector, nvectors, i, ret, irq;
> > - u16 max_intr;
> > + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> > - nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
> > - if (!(nvectors > 0))
> > - return nvectors;
> > + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > + snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n", pci_name(pdev), i);
> > + vector = i;
> > + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > + ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
> > + vf->vring[i].msix_name,
> > + &vf->vring[i]);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
> > + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, i);
> > + } else {
> > + vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
> > + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> > + }
> > + }
> > - max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
> > + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> > +
> > + vector = 0;
> > + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared vqs interrupt name */
>
>
> I think we can remove this comment since the code is straightforward.
>
>
> > + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-vqs-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev));
> > + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > + ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler, 0,
> > + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
> > + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> > + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> > +
> > + vector = 0;
> > + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared device interrupt name */
> > + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-dev-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev));
> > + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > + ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler, 0,
> > + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
> > - ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, max_intr,
> > - max_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> > - if (ret < 0) {
> > - IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to alloc IRQ vectors\n");
> > return ret;
> > }
> > + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
> > + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> > + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> > + }
> > +
> > + vf->config_irq = irq;
> > + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, vector);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ifcvf_request_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > +{
> > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> > + ret = ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(adapter);
> > + else
> > + ret = ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(adapter);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ifcvf_request_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > + int config_vector, ret;
> > +
> > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> > + /* vector 0 ~ vf->nr_vring for vqs, num vf->nr_vring vector for config interrupt */
> > + config_vector = vf->nr_vring;
> > +
> > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> > + /* vector 0 for vqs and 1 for config interrupt */
> > + config_vector = 1;
> > +
> > snprintf(vf->config_msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-config\n",
> > pci_name(pdev));
> > - vector = 0;
> > - vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > + vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, config_vector);
> > ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq,
> > ifcvf_config_changed, 0,
> > vf->config_msix_name, vf);
> > if (ret) {
> > IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request config irq\n");
> > + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, vf->nr_vring);
> > return ret;
> > }
> > - for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > - snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n",
> > - pci_name(pdev), i);
> > - vector = i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF;
> > - irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > - ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
> > - vf->vring[i].msix_name,
> > - &vf->vring[i]);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - IFCVF_ERR(pdev,
> > - "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
> > - ifcvf_free_irq(adapter, i);
> > + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, config_vector);
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > +{
>
>
> As replied above, I think having two modes should be sufficient and the code
> could be greatly simplified.
>
> Thanks
>
Well it is claimed there are platforms where we are short
on vectors. 3 versus 2 seems a 50% saving. You disagree?
> > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > + int nvectors, ret, max_intr;
> > - vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
> > + nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
> > + if (!(nvectors > 0))
> > + return nvectors;
> > +
> > + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
> > + max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
> > + if (nvectors < max_intr)
> > + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
> > +
> > + if (nvectors == 1) {
> > + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED;
> > + ret = ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(adapter);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > }
> > + ret = ifcvf_request_vq_irq(adapter);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = ifcvf_request_config_irq(adapter);
> > +
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -441,7 +611,10 @@ static int ifcvf_vdpa_get_vq_irq(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
> > {
> > struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev);
> > - return vf->vring[qid].irq;
> > + if (vf->vqs_shared_irq < 0)
> > + return vf->vring[qid].irq;
> > + else
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > static struct vdpa_notification_area ifcvf_get_vq_notification(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement shared IRQ feature
2022-02-14 10:01 ` Zhu Lingshan
@ 2022-02-14 14:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <4920887f-0521-9054-035d-32114301ba3a@intel.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2022-02-14 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhu Lingshan; +Cc: netdev, Zhu Lingshan, virtualization
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 06:01:56PM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
>
>
> On 2/14/2022 3:19 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > 在 2022/2/3 下午3:27, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
> > > On some platforms/devices, there may not be enough MSI vector
> > > slots allocated for virtqueues and config changes. In such a case,
> > > the interrupt sources(virtqueues, config changes) must share
> > > an IRQ/vector, to avoid initialization failures, keep
> > > the device functional.
> > >
> > > This commit handles three cases:
> > > (1) number of the allocated vectors == the number of virtqueues + 1
> > > (config changes), every virtqueue and the config interrupt has
> > > a separated vector/IRQ, the best and the most likely case.
> > > (2) number of the allocated vectors is less than the best case, but
> > > greater than 1. In this case, all virtqueues share a vector/IRQ,
> > > the config interrupt has a separated vector/IRQ
> > > (3) only one vector is allocated, in this case, the virtqueues and
> > > the config interrupt share a vector/IRQ. The worst and most
> > > unlikely case.
> > >
> > > Otherwise, it needs to fail.
> > >
> > > This commit introduces some helper functions:
> > > ifcvf_set_vq_vector() and ifcvf_set_config_vector() sets virtqueue
> > > vector and config vector in the device config space, so that
> > > the device can send interrupt DMA.
> > >
> > > This commit adds some fields in struct ifcvf_hw and re-placed
> > > the existed fields to be aligned with the cacheline.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c | 47 ++++--
> > > drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 23 ++-
> > > drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 243 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > 3 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> > > b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> > > index 397692ae671c..18dcb63ab1e3 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> > > @@ -15,6 +15,36 @@ struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct
> > > ifcvf_hw *hw)
> > > return container_of(hw, struct ifcvf_adapter, vf);
> > > }
> > > +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector)
> > > +{
> > > + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> > > + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> > > +
> > > + ifc_iowrite16(qid, &cfg->queue_select);
> > > + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> > > + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) ==
> > > VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> > > + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for queue %u\n", qid);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> >
> >
> > Let's leave this check for the caller, E.g can caller try to assign
> > NO_VECTOR during uni-nit?
> ifcvf driver sets NO_VECTOR when call hw_disable(). I am not sure whether I
> get it,
> Yes we can let the caller check a vq vector, however this may cause more
> than three levels brackets, may looks ugly.
> >
> >
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector)
> > > +{
> > > + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> > > + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> > > +
> > > + cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> > > + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->msix_config);
> > > + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> > > + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> >
> >
> > Similar question as above.
> >
> >
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void __iomem *get_cap_addr(struct ifcvf_hw *hw,
> > > struct virtio_pci_cap *cap)
> > > {
> > > @@ -140,6 +170,8 @@ int ifcvf_init_hw(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, struct
> > > pci_dev *pdev)
> > > hw->common_cfg, hw->notify_base, hw->isr,
> > > hw->dev_cfg, hw->notify_off_multiplier);
> > > + hw->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -321,12 +353,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> > > ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> > > cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> > > - ifc_iowrite16(IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF, &cfg->msix_config);
> > > -
> > > - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> > > - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > - }
> > > for (i = 0; i < hw->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > if (!hw->vring[i].ready)
> > > @@ -340,15 +366,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> > > ifc_iowrite64_twopart(hw->vring[i].used, &cfg->queue_used_lo,
> > > &cfg->queue_used_hi);
> > > ifc_iowrite16(hw->vring[i].size, &cfg->queue_size);
> > > - ifc_iowrite16(i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF,
> > > &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> > > -
> > > - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) ==
> > > - VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> > > - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev,
> > > - "No msix vector for queue %u\n", i);
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > ifcvf_set_vq_state(hw, i, hw->vring[i].last_avail_idx);
> > > ifc_iowrite16(1, &cfg->queue_enable);
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> > > b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> > > index 949b4fb9d554..9cfe088c82e9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> > > @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@
> > > #define IFCVF_QUEUE_ALIGNMENT PAGE_SIZE
> > > #define IFCVF_QUEUE_MAX 32768
> > > -#define IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF 0
> > > -#define IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF 1
> > > #define IFCVF_PCI_MAX_RESOURCE 6
> > > #define IFCVF_LM_CFG_SIZE 0x40
> > > @@ -42,6 +40,13 @@
> > > #define ifcvf_private_to_vf(adapter) \
> > > (&((struct ifcvf_adapter *)adapter)->vf)
> > > +/* all vqs and config interrupt has its own vector */
> > > +#define MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG 1
> > > +/* all vqs share a vector, and config interrupt has a separate
> > > vector */
> > > +#define MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG 2
> > > +/* all vqs and config interrupt share a vector */
> > > +#define MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED 3
> >
> >
> > I think there's no much value to differ 2 from 3 consider config
> > interrupt should be rare.
> IMHO we still need 2 and 3, because MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG means
> there are at least 2 vectors,
> the vqs share one vector, config change has its own vector.
> MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED means three are only one vector, all vqs and config
> changes need to share this vector.
> >
> >
> >
> > > +
> > > static inline u8 ifc_ioread8(u8 __iomem *addr)
> > > {
> > > return ioread8(addr);
> > > @@ -97,25 +102,27 @@ struct ifcvf_hw {
> > > u8 __iomem *isr;
> > > /* Live migration */
> > > u8 __iomem *lm_cfg;
> > > - u16 nr_vring;
> >
> >
> > Any reason for moving nv_vring, config_size, and other stuffs?
> for cacheline alignment.
maybe a separate patch then.
> >
> >
> >
> > > /* Notification bar number */
> > > u8 notify_bar;
> > > + u8 msix_vector_status;
> > > + /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
> > > + u32 config_size;
> > > /* Notificaiton bar address */
> > > void __iomem *notify_base;
> > > phys_addr_t notify_base_pa;
> > > u32 notify_off_multiplier;
> > > + u32 dev_type;
> > > u64 req_features;
> > > u64 hw_features;
> > > - u32 dev_type;
> > > struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *common_cfg;
> > > void __iomem *dev_cfg;
> > > struct vring_info vring[IFCVF_MAX_QUEUES];
> > > void __iomem * const *base;
> > > char config_msix_name[256];
> > > struct vdpa_callback config_cb;
> > > - unsigned int config_irq;
> > > - /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
> > > - u32 config_size;
> > > + int config_irq;
> > > + int vqs_shared_irq;
> > > + u16 nr_vring;
> > > };
> > > struct ifcvf_adapter {
> > > @@ -160,4 +167,6 @@ int ifcvf_set_vq_state(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16
> > > qid, u16 num);
> > > struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> > > int ifcvf_probed_virtio_net(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> > > u32 ifcvf_get_config_size(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> > > +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector);
> > > +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector);
> > > #endif /* _IFCVF_H_ */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> > > b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> > > index 44c89ab0b6da..ca414399f040 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > > #define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Intel Corporation"
> > > #define IFCVF_DRIVER_NAME "ifcvf"
> > > +/* handles config interrupt */
> >
> >
> > This seems unrelated to the shared IRQ logic and it looks useless since
> > it's easily to deduce it from the function name below.
> OK, do you mean the comments? I can remove these comments.
> >
> >
> > > static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq, void *arg)
> > > {
> > > struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> > > @@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq,
> > > void *arg)
> > > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > }
> > > +/* handles vqs interrupt */
> >
> >
> > So did this.
> >
> >
> > > static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> > > {
> > > struct vring_info *vring = arg;
> > > @@ -37,24 +39,78 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq,
> > > void *arg)
> > > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > }
> > > +/* handls vqs shared interrupt */
> > > +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> > > +{
> > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> > > + struct vring_info *vring;
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > + vring = &vf->vring[i];
> > > + if (vring->cb.callback)
> > > + vf->vring->cb.callback(vring->cb.private);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/* handles a shared interrupt for vqs and config */
> > > +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> > > +{
> > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> > > + u8 isr;
> > > +
> > > + isr = ifc_ioread8(vf->isr);
> >
> >
> > We need to exactly what vp_interrupt do here. Checking against vf->isr
> > first and return IRQ_NONE if it is not set.
> >
> > Always return IRQ_HANDLED will break the device who shares an irq with
> > IFCVF.
> as we discussed in another thread(spec inconsistency about ISR), ISR may
> only works for INTx for now,
> but VFs don't have INTx, and a VF may not share its vectors with other
> devices, so I guess it can work
> and may be our best try for now.
> >
> >
> > > + if (isr & VIRTIO_PCI_ISR_CONFIG)
> > > + ifcvf_config_changed(irq, arg);
> > > +
> > > + return ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(irq, arg);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(void *data)
> > > {
> > > pci_free_irq_vectors(data);
> > > }
> > > -static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> > > +static void ifcvf_free_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int
> > > queues)
> > > {
> > > struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > int i;
> > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG) {
> > > + for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> > > + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
> > > + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > + } else {
> > > + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vqs_shared_irq, vf);
> > > + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > - for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> > > - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
> > > - vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> > > +static void ifcvf_free_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > +{
> > > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > +
> > > + /* If the irq is shared by all vqs and the config interrupt,
> > > + * it is already freed in ifcvf_free_vq_irq, so here only
> > > + * need to free config irq when msix_vector_status !=
> > > MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED
> > > + */
> > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status != MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED) {
> > > + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
> > > + vf->config_irq = -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> > > +{
> > > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
> > > + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, queues);
> > > + ifcvf_free_config_irq(adapter);
> > > ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
> > > }
> > > @@ -86,58 +142,172 @@ static int ifcvf_alloc_vectors(struct
> > > ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > -static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > +static int ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > {
> > > struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > - int vector, nvectors, i, ret, irq;
> > > - u16 max_intr;
> > > + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> > > - nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
> > > - if (!(nvectors > 0))
> > > - return nvectors;
> > > + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > + snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n",
> > > pci_name(pdev), i);
> > > + vector = i;
> > > + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > > + ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
> > > + vf->vring[i].msix_name,
> > > + &vf->vring[i]);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
> > > + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, i);
> > > + } else {
> > > + vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
> > > + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > - max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
> > > + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > +{
> > > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> > > +
> > > + vector = 0;
> > > + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared vqs
> > > interrupt name */
> >
> >
> > I think we can remove this comment since the code is straightforward.
> sure
> >
> >
> > > + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256,
> > > "ifcvf[%s]-vqs-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev));
> > > + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > > + ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler, 0,
> > > + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
> > > + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> > > + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > +{
> > > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> > > +
> > > + vector = 0;
> > > + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared device
> > > interrupt name */
> > > + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256,
> > > "ifcvf[%s]-dev-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev));
> > > + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > > + ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler, 0,
> > > + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
> > > - ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, max_intr,
> > > - max_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> > > - if (ret < 0) {
> > > - IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to alloc IRQ vectors\n");
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
> > > + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> > > + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + vf->config_irq = irq;
> > > + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, vector);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int ifcvf_request_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > +{
> > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> > > + ret = ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(adapter);
> > > + else
> > > + ret = ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(adapter);
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int ifcvf_request_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > +{
> > > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > + int config_vector, ret;
> > > +
> > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> > > + /* vector 0 ~ vf->nr_vring for vqs, num vf->nr_vring vector
> > > for config interrupt */
> > > + config_vector = vf->nr_vring;
> > > +
> > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> > > + /* vector 0 for vqs and 1 for config interrupt */
> > > + config_vector = 1;
> > > +
> > > snprintf(vf->config_msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-config\n",
> > > pci_name(pdev));
> > > - vector = 0;
> > > - vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > > + vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, config_vector);
> > > ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq,
> > > ifcvf_config_changed, 0,
> > > vf->config_msix_name, vf);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request config irq\n");
> > > + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, vf->nr_vring);
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > - for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > - snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n",
> > > - pci_name(pdev), i);
> > > - vector = i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF;
> > > - irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > > - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > > - ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
> > > - vf->vring[i].msix_name,
> > > - &vf->vring[i]);
> > > - if (ret) {
> > > - IFCVF_ERR(pdev,
> > > - "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
> > > - ifcvf_free_irq(adapter, i);
> > > + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, config_vector);
> > > - return ret;
> > > - }
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > +{
> >
> >
> > As replied above, I think having two modes should be sufficient and the
> > code could be greatly simplified.
> Do you mean if we don't get enough vectors, just use only one vector for the
> vqs and config changes? I guess this
> only works if ISR work for MSIX as we expects, or we may waste some time in
> the device config space.
>
> Thanks,
> Zhu Lingshan
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > + int nvectors, ret, max_intr;
> > > - vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
> > > + nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
> > > + if (!(nvectors > 0))
> > > + return nvectors;
> > > +
> > > + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
> > > + max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
> > > + if (nvectors < max_intr)
> > > + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
> > > +
> > > + if (nvectors == 1) {
> > > + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED;
> > > + ret = ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(adapter);
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > }
> > > + ret = ifcvf_request_vq_irq(adapter);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = ifcvf_request_config_irq(adapter);
> > > +
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -441,7 +611,10 @@ static int ifcvf_vdpa_get_vq_irq(struct
> > > vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
> > > {
> > > struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev);
> > > - return vf->vring[qid].irq;
> > > + if (vf->vqs_shared_irq < 0)
> > > + return vf->vring[qid].irq;
> > > + else
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > > static struct vdpa_notification_area
> > > ifcvf_get_vq_notification(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Virtualization mailing list
> > Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement shared IRQ feature
[not found] ` <4920887f-0521-9054-035d-32114301ba3a@intel.com>
@ 2022-02-15 3:03 ` Jason Wang
[not found] ` <70ee26d4-9553-543a-ccd9-684f468e2704@intel.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2022-02-15 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhu, Lingshan; +Cc: netdev, virtualization, Michael S. Tsirkin
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:18 AM Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/14/2022 10:27 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 06:01:56PM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/14/2022 3:19 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>> 在 2022/2/3 下午3:27, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
> >>>> On some platforms/devices, there may not be enough MSI vector
> >>>> slots allocated for virtqueues and config changes. In such a case,
> >>>> the interrupt sources(virtqueues, config changes) must share
> >>>> an IRQ/vector, to avoid initialization failures, keep
> >>>> the device functional.
> >>>>
> >>>> This commit handles three cases:
> >>>> (1) number of the allocated vectors == the number of virtqueues + 1
> >>>> (config changes), every virtqueue and the config interrupt has
> >>>> a separated vector/IRQ, the best and the most likely case.
> >>>> (2) number of the allocated vectors is less than the best case, but
> >>>> greater than 1. In this case, all virtqueues share a vector/IRQ,
> >>>> the config interrupt has a separated vector/IRQ
> >>>> (3) only one vector is allocated, in this case, the virtqueues and
> >>>> the config interrupt share a vector/IRQ. The worst and most
> >>>> unlikely case.
> >>>>
> >>>> Otherwise, it needs to fail.
> >>>>
> >>>> This commit introduces some helper functions:
> >>>> ifcvf_set_vq_vector() and ifcvf_set_config_vector() sets virtqueue
> >>>> vector and config vector in the device config space, so that
> >>>> the device can send interrupt DMA.
> >>>>
> >>>> This commit adds some fields in struct ifcvf_hw and re-placed
> >>>> the existed fields to be aligned with the cacheline.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c | 47 ++++--
> >>>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 23 ++-
> >>>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 243 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >>>> 3 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> >>>> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> >>>> index 397692ae671c..18dcb63ab1e3 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> >>>> @@ -15,6 +15,36 @@ struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct
> >>>> ifcvf_hw *hw)
> >>>> return container_of(hw, struct ifcvf_adapter, vf);
> >>>> }
> >>>> +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> >>>> + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + ifc_iowrite16(qid, &cfg->queue_select);
> >>>> + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> >>>> + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) ==
> >>>> VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> >>>> + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for queue %u\n", qid);
> >>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>> + }
> >>>
> >>> Let's leave this check for the caller, E.g can caller try to assign
> >>> NO_VECTOR during uni-nit?
> >> ifcvf driver sets NO_VECTOR when call hw_disable(). I am not sure whether I
> >> get it,
I meant you invent the ifcvf_set_vq_vector() you'd better use that in
hw_disable() as well.
> >> Yes we can let the caller check a vq vector, however this may cause more
> >> than three levels brackets, may looks ugly.
I don't understand here, this is how virito_pci did:
/*
* vp_modern_queue_vector - set the MSIX vector for a specific virtqueue
* @mdev: the modern virtio-pci device
* @index: queue index
* @vector: the config vector
*
* Returns the config vector read from the device
*/
u16 vp_modern_queue_vector(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev,
u16 index, u16 vector)
{
struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = mdev->common;
vp_iowrite16(index, &cfg->queue_select);
vp_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
/* Flush the write out to device */
return vp_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vp_modern_queue_vector);
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return 0;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> >>>> + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> >>>> + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->msix_config);
> >>>> + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> >>>> + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
> >>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>> + }
> >>>
> >>> Similar question as above.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return 0;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> static void __iomem *get_cap_addr(struct ifcvf_hw *hw,
> >>>> struct virtio_pci_cap *cap)
> >>>> {
> >>>> @@ -140,6 +170,8 @@ int ifcvf_init_hw(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, struct
> >>>> pci_dev *pdev)
> >>>> hw->common_cfg, hw->notify_base, hw->isr,
> >>>> hw->dev_cfg, hw->notify_off_multiplier);
> >>>> + hw->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> >>>> +
> >>>> return 0;
> >>>> }
> >>>> @@ -321,12 +353,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> >>>> ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> >>>> cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> >>>> - ifc_iowrite16(IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF, &cfg->msix_config);
> >>>> -
> >>>> - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> >>>> - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
> >>>> - return -EINVAL;
> >>>> - }
> >>>> for (i = 0; i < hw->nr_vring; i++) {
> >>>> if (!hw->vring[i].ready)
> >>>> @@ -340,15 +366,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> >>>> ifc_iowrite64_twopart(hw->vring[i].used, &cfg->queue_used_lo,
> >>>> &cfg->queue_used_hi);
> >>>> ifc_iowrite16(hw->vring[i].size, &cfg->queue_size);
> >>>> - ifc_iowrite16(i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF,
> >>>> &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> >>>> -
> >>>> - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) ==
> >>>> - VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> >>>> - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev,
> >>>> - "No msix vector for queue %u\n", i);
> >>>> - return -EINVAL;
> >>>> - }
> >>>> -
> >>>> ifcvf_set_vq_state(hw, i, hw->vring[i].last_avail_idx);
> >>>> ifc_iowrite16(1, &cfg->queue_enable);
> >>>> }
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> >>>> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> >>>> index 949b4fb9d554..9cfe088c82e9 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> >>>> @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@
> >>>> #define IFCVF_QUEUE_ALIGNMENT PAGE_SIZE
> >>>> #define IFCVF_QUEUE_MAX 32768
> >>>> -#define IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF 0
> >>>> -#define IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF 1
> >>>> #define IFCVF_PCI_MAX_RESOURCE 6
> >>>> #define IFCVF_LM_CFG_SIZE 0x40
> >>>> @@ -42,6 +40,13 @@
> >>>> #define ifcvf_private_to_vf(adapter) \
> >>>> (&((struct ifcvf_adapter *)adapter)->vf)
> >>>> +/* all vqs and config interrupt has its own vector */
> >>>> +#define MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG 1
> >>>> +/* all vqs share a vector, and config interrupt has a separate
> >>>> vector */
> >>>> +#define MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG 2
> >>>> +/* all vqs and config interrupt share a vector */
> >>>> +#define MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED 3
> >>>
> >>> I think there's no much value to differ 2 from 3 consider config
> >>> interrupt should be rare.
> >> IMHO we still need 2 and 3, because MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG means
> >> there are at least 2 vectors,
> >> the vqs share one vector, config change has its own vector.
I want to know the value of having a dedicated vector for config?
> >> MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED means three are only one vector, all vqs and config
> >> changes need to share this vector.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> static inline u8 ifc_ioread8(u8 __iomem *addr)
> >>>> {
> >>>> return ioread8(addr);
> >>>> @@ -97,25 +102,27 @@ struct ifcvf_hw {
> >>>> u8 __iomem *isr;
> >>>> /* Live migration */
> >>>> u8 __iomem *lm_cfg;
> >>>> - u16 nr_vring;
> >>>
> >>> Any reason for moving nv_vring, config_size, and other stuffs?
> >> for cacheline alignment.
> > maybe a separate patch then.
> Sure
>
> Thanks!
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> /* Notification bar number */
> >>>> u8 notify_bar;
> >>>> + u8 msix_vector_status;
> >>>> + /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
> >>>> + u32 config_size;
> >>>> /* Notificaiton bar address */
> >>>> void __iomem *notify_base;
> >>>> phys_addr_t notify_base_pa;
> >>>> u32 notify_off_multiplier;
> >>>> + u32 dev_type;
> >>>> u64 req_features;
> >>>> u64 hw_features;
> >>>> - u32 dev_type;
> >>>> struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *common_cfg;
> >>>> void __iomem *dev_cfg;
> >>>> struct vring_info vring[IFCVF_MAX_QUEUES];
> >>>> void __iomem * const *base;
> >>>> char config_msix_name[256];
> >>>> struct vdpa_callback config_cb;
> >>>> - unsigned int config_irq;
> >>>> - /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
> >>>> - u32 config_size;
> >>>> + int config_irq;
> >>>> + int vqs_shared_irq;
> >>>> + u16 nr_vring;
> >>>> };
> >>>> struct ifcvf_adapter {
> >>>> @@ -160,4 +167,6 @@ int ifcvf_set_vq_state(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16
> >>>> qid, u16 num);
> >>>> struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> >>>> int ifcvf_probed_virtio_net(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> >>>> u32 ifcvf_get_config_size(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> >>>> +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector);
> >>>> +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector);
> >>>> #endif /* _IFCVF_H_ */
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> >>>> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> >>>> index 44c89ab0b6da..ca414399f040 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> >>>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> >>>> #define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Intel Corporation"
> >>>> #define IFCVF_DRIVER_NAME "ifcvf"
> >>>> +/* handles config interrupt */
> >>>
> >>> This seems unrelated to the shared IRQ logic and it looks useless since
> >>> it's easily to deduce it from the function name below.
> >> OK, do you mean the comments? I can remove these comments.
Yes.
> >>>
> >>>> static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq, void *arg)
> >>>> {
> >>>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> >>>> @@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq,
> >>>> void *arg)
> >>>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >>>> }
> >>>> +/* handles vqs interrupt */
> >>>
> >>> So did this.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> >>>> {
> >>>> struct vring_info *vring = arg;
> >>>> @@ -37,24 +39,78 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq,
> >>>> void *arg)
> >>>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >>>> }
> >>>> +/* handls vqs shared interrupt */
> >>>> +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> >>>> + struct vring_info *vring;
> >>>> + int i;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> >>>> + vring = &vf->vring[i];
> >>>> + if (vring->cb.callback)
> >>>> + vf->vring->cb.callback(vring->cb.private);
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +/* handles a shared interrupt for vqs and config */
> >>>> +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> >>>> + u8 isr;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + isr = ifc_ioread8(vf->isr);
> >>>
> >>> We need to exactly what vp_interrupt do here. Checking against vf->isr
> >>> first and return IRQ_NONE if it is not set.
> >>>
> >>> Always return IRQ_HANDLED will break the device who shares an irq with
> >>> IFCVF.
> >> as we discussed in another thread(spec inconsistency about ISR), ISR may
> >> only works for INTx for now,
> >> but VFs don't have INTx, and a VF may not share its vectors with other
> >> devices, so I guess it can work
> >> and may be our best try for now.
Right, I thought you're using shared irq but actually not.
> >>>
> >>>> + if (isr & VIRTIO_PCI_ISR_CONFIG)
> >>>> + ifcvf_config_changed(irq, arg);
I wonder how ISR works in IFCVF, if ISR doesn't work for MSI, we need
to remove the check of isr otherwise we will break config interrupt?
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(irq, arg);
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> static void ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(void *data)
> >>>> {
> >>>> pci_free_irq_vectors(data);
> >>>> }
> >>>> -static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> >>>> +static void ifcvf_free_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int
> >>>> queues)
> >>>> {
> >>>> struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> >>>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> >>>> int i;
> >>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG) {
> >>>> + for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> >>>> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
> >>>> + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + } else {
> >>>> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vqs_shared_irq, vf);
> >>>> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +}
> >>>> - for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> >>>> - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
> >>>> - vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> >>>> +static void ifcvf_free_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> >>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /* If the irq is shared by all vqs and the config interrupt,
> >>>> + * it is already freed in ifcvf_free_vq_irq, so here only
> >>>> + * need to free config irq when msix_vector_status !=
> >>>> MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED
> >>>> + */
> >>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status != MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED) {
> >>>> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
> >>>> + vf->config_irq = -EINVAL;
> >>>> }
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> >>>> - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
> >>>> + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, queues);
> >>>> + ifcvf_free_config_irq(adapter);
> >>>> ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
> >>>> }
> >>>> @@ -86,58 +142,172 @@ static int ifcvf_alloc_vectors(struct
> >>>> ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>> return ret;
> >>>> }
> >>>> -static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>> +static int ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>> {
> >>>> struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> >>>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> >>>> - int vector, nvectors, i, ret, irq;
> >>>> - u16 max_intr;
> >>>> + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> >>>> - nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
> >>>> - if (!(nvectors > 0))
> >>>> - return nvectors;
> >>>> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> >>>> + snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n",
> >>>> pci_name(pdev), i);
> >>>> + vector = i;
> >>>> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> >>>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> >>>> + ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
> >>>> + vf->vring[i].msix_name,
> >>>> + &vf->vring[i]);
> >>>> + if (ret) {
> >>>> + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
> >>>> + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, i);
> >>>> + } else {
> >>>> + vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
> >>>> + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + }
> >>>> - max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
> >>>> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return 0;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static int ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> >>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> >>>> + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + vector = 0;
> >>>> + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared vqs
> >>>> interrupt name */
> >>>
> >>> I think we can remove this comment since the code is straightforward.
> >> sure
> >>>
> >>>> + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256,
> >>>> "ifcvf[%s]-vqs-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev));
> >>>> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> >>>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> >>>> + ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler, 0,
> >>>> + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
> >>>> + if (ret) {
> >>>> + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return ret;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
> >>>> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> >>>> + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> >>>> + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return 0;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static int ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> >>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> >>>> + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + vector = 0;
> >>>> + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared device
> >>>> interrupt name */
> >>>> + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256,
> >>>> "ifcvf[%s]-dev-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev));
> >>>> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> >>>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> >>>> + ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler, 0,
> >>>> + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
> >>>> + if (ret) {
> >>>> + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
> >>>> - ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, max_intr,
> >>>> - max_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> >>>> - if (ret < 0) {
> >>>> - IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to alloc IRQ vectors\n");
> >>>> return ret;
> >>>> }
> >>>> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
> >>>> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> >>>> + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> >>>> + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>> + vf->config_irq = irq;
> >>>> + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, vector);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return 0;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static int ifcvf_request_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> >>>> + int ret;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> >>>> + ret = ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(adapter);
> >>>> + else
> >>>> + ret = ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(adapter);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return ret;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static int ifcvf_request_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> >>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> >>>> + int config_vector, ret;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED)
> >>>> + return 0;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> >>>> + /* vector 0 ~ vf->nr_vring for vqs, num vf->nr_vring vector
> >>>> for config interrupt */
> >>>> + config_vector = vf->nr_vring;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> >>>> + /* vector 0 for vqs and 1 for config interrupt */
> >>>> + config_vector = 1;
> >>>> +
> >>>> snprintf(vf->config_msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-config\n",
> >>>> pci_name(pdev));
> >>>> - vector = 0;
> >>>> - vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> >>>> + vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, config_vector);
> >>>> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq,
> >>>> ifcvf_config_changed, 0,
> >>>> vf->config_msix_name, vf);
> >>>> if (ret) {
> >>>> IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request config irq\n");
> >>>> + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, vf->nr_vring);
> >>>> return ret;
> >>>> }
> >>>> - for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> >>>> - snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n",
> >>>> - pci_name(pdev), i);
> >>>> - vector = i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF;
> >>>> - irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> >>>> - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> >>>> - ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
> >>>> - vf->vring[i].msix_name,
> >>>> - &vf->vring[i]);
> >>>> - if (ret) {
> >>>> - IFCVF_ERR(pdev,
> >>>> - "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
> >>>> - ifcvf_free_irq(adapter, i);
> >>>> + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, config_vector);
> >>>> - return ret;
> >>>> - }
> >>>> + return 0;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>> +{
> >>>
> >>> As replied above, I think having two modes should be sufficient and the
> >>> code could be greatly simplified.
> >> Do you mean if we don't get enough vectors, just use only one vector for the
> >> vqs and config changes? I guess this
> >> only works if ISR work for MSIX as we expects, or we may waste some time in
> >> the device config space.
Ok, I think I got you here. It's better to document this in the change log.
Thanks
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Zhu Lingshan
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> >>>> + int nvectors, ret, max_intr;
> >>>> - vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
> >>>> + nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
> >>>> + if (!(nvectors > 0))
> >>>> + return nvectors;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
> >>>> + max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
> >>>> + if (nvectors < max_intr)
> >>>> + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if (nvectors == 1) {
> >>>> + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED;
> >>>> + ret = ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(adapter);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return ret;
> >>>> }
> >>>> + ret = ifcvf_request_vq_irq(adapter);
> >>>> + if (ret)
> >>>> + return ret;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + ret = ifcvf_request_config_irq(adapter);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if (ret)
> >>>> + return ret;
> >>>> +
> >>>> return 0;
> >>>> }
> >>>> @@ -441,7 +611,10 @@ static int ifcvf_vdpa_get_vq_irq(struct
> >>>> vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
> >>>> {
> >>>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev);
> >>>> - return vf->vring[qid].irq;
> >>>> + if (vf->vqs_shared_irq < 0)
> >>>> + return vf->vring[qid].irq;
> >>>> + else
> >>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>> }
> >>>> static struct vdpa_notification_area
> >>>> ifcvf_get_vq_notification(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Virtualization mailing list
> >>> Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
> >>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement shared IRQ feature
2022-02-14 14:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2022-02-15 3:34 ` Jason Wang
2022-02-15 14:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2022-02-15 3:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: netdev, Zhu Lingshan, virtualization
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:25 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 03:19:25PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > 在 2022/2/3 下午3:27, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
> > > On some platforms/devices, there may not be enough MSI vector
> > > slots allocated for virtqueues and config changes. In such a case,
> > > the interrupt sources(virtqueues, config changes) must share
> > > an IRQ/vector, to avoid initialization failures, keep
> > > the device functional.
> > >
> > > This commit handles three cases:
> > > (1) number of the allocated vectors == the number of virtqueues + 1
> > > (config changes), every virtqueue and the config interrupt has
> > > a separated vector/IRQ, the best and the most likely case.
> > > (2) number of the allocated vectors is less than the best case, but
> > > greater than 1. In this case, all virtqueues share a vector/IRQ,
> > > the config interrupt has a separated vector/IRQ
> > > (3) only one vector is allocated, in this case, the virtqueues and
> > > the config interrupt share a vector/IRQ. The worst and most
> > > unlikely case.
> > >
> > > Otherwise, it needs to fail.
> > >
> > > This commit introduces some helper functions:
> > > ifcvf_set_vq_vector() and ifcvf_set_config_vector() sets virtqueue
> > > vector and config vector in the device config space, so that
> > > the device can send interrupt DMA.
> > >
> > > This commit adds some fields in struct ifcvf_hw and re-placed
> > > the existed fields to be aligned with the cacheline.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c | 47 ++++--
> > > drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 23 ++-
> > > drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 243 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > 3 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> > > index 397692ae671c..18dcb63ab1e3 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> > > @@ -15,6 +15,36 @@ struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> > > return container_of(hw, struct ifcvf_adapter, vf);
> > > }
> > > +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector)
> > > +{
> > > + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> > > + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> > > +
> > > + ifc_iowrite16(qid, &cfg->queue_select);
> > > + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> > > + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> > > + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for queue %u\n", qid);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> >
> >
> > Let's leave this check for the caller, E.g can caller try to assign
> > NO_VECTOR during uni-nit?
>
>
> Hmm I'm not sure I agree. Caller will have to write queue select
> again, and that's an extra IO, which is a waste.
> And having function checking itself just seems better contained.
It's as simple as just return what we read here like virtio_pci did:
u16 vp_modern_queue_vector(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev,
u16 index, u16 vector)
{
struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = mdev->common;
vp_iowrite16(index, &cfg->queue_select);
vp_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
/* Flush the write out to device */
return vp_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vp_modern_queue_vector);
Then the caller can decide to check it with NO_VECTOR if needed.
Current code will break the callers that want to set NO_VECTOR.
>
> >
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector)
> > > +{
> > > + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> > > + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> > > +
> > > + cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> > > + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->msix_config);
> > > + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> > > + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> >
> >
> > Similar question as above.
> >
> >
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void __iomem *get_cap_addr(struct ifcvf_hw *hw,
> > > struct virtio_pci_cap *cap)
> > > {
> > > @@ -140,6 +170,8 @@ int ifcvf_init_hw(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > hw->common_cfg, hw->notify_base, hw->isr,
> > > hw->dev_cfg, hw->notify_off_multiplier);
> > > + hw->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -321,12 +353,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> > > ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> > > cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> > > - ifc_iowrite16(IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF, &cfg->msix_config);
> > > -
> > > - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> > > - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > - }
> > > for (i = 0; i < hw->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > if (!hw->vring[i].ready)
> > > @@ -340,15 +366,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> > > ifc_iowrite64_twopart(hw->vring[i].used, &cfg->queue_used_lo,
> > > &cfg->queue_used_hi);
> > > ifc_iowrite16(hw->vring[i].size, &cfg->queue_size);
> > > - ifc_iowrite16(i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> > > -
> > > - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) ==
> > > - VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> > > - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev,
> > > - "No msix vector for queue %u\n", i);
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > ifcvf_set_vq_state(hw, i, hw->vring[i].last_avail_idx);
> > > ifc_iowrite16(1, &cfg->queue_enable);
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> > > index 949b4fb9d554..9cfe088c82e9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> > > @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@
> > > #define IFCVF_QUEUE_ALIGNMENT PAGE_SIZE
> > > #define IFCVF_QUEUE_MAX 32768
> > > -#define IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF 0
> > > -#define IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF 1
> > > #define IFCVF_PCI_MAX_RESOURCE 6
> > > #define IFCVF_LM_CFG_SIZE 0x40
> > > @@ -42,6 +40,13 @@
> > > #define ifcvf_private_to_vf(adapter) \
> > > (&((struct ifcvf_adapter *)adapter)->vf)
> > > +/* all vqs and config interrupt has its own vector */
> > > +#define MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG 1
> > > +/* all vqs share a vector, and config interrupt has a separate vector */
> > > +#define MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG 2
> > > +/* all vqs and config interrupt share a vector */
> > > +#define MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED 3
> >
> >
> > I think there's no much value to differ 2 from 3 consider config interrupt
> > should be rare.
>
>
> Yes but if we do not have a dedicated vector then we need an
> extra device IO (in fact, a read) on each interrupt.
Ok, right.
>
> >
> > > +
> > > static inline u8 ifc_ioread8(u8 __iomem *addr)
> > > {
> > > return ioread8(addr);
> > > @@ -97,25 +102,27 @@ struct ifcvf_hw {
> > > u8 __iomem *isr;
> > > /* Live migration */
> > > u8 __iomem *lm_cfg;
> > > - u16 nr_vring;
> >
> >
> > Any reason for moving nv_vring, config_size, and other stuffs?
> >
> >
> > > /* Notification bar number */
> > > u8 notify_bar;
> > > + u8 msix_vector_status;
> > > + /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
> > > + u32 config_size;
> > > /* Notificaiton bar address */
> > > void __iomem *notify_base;
> > > phys_addr_t notify_base_pa;
> > > u32 notify_off_multiplier;
> > > + u32 dev_type;
> > > u64 req_features;
> > > u64 hw_features;
> > > - u32 dev_type;
> > > struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *common_cfg;
> > > void __iomem *dev_cfg;
> > > struct vring_info vring[IFCVF_MAX_QUEUES];
> > > void __iomem * const *base;
> > > char config_msix_name[256];
> > > struct vdpa_callback config_cb;
> > > - unsigned int config_irq;
> > > - /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
> > > - u32 config_size;
> > > + int config_irq;
> > > + int vqs_shared_irq;
> > > + u16 nr_vring;
> > > };
> > > struct ifcvf_adapter {
> > > @@ -160,4 +167,6 @@ int ifcvf_set_vq_state(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, u16 num);
> > > struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> > > int ifcvf_probed_virtio_net(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> > > u32 ifcvf_get_config_size(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> > > +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector);
> > > +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector);
> > > #endif /* _IFCVF_H_ */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> > > index 44c89ab0b6da..ca414399f040 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > > #define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Intel Corporation"
> > > #define IFCVF_DRIVER_NAME "ifcvf"
> > > +/* handles config interrupt */
> >
> >
> > This seems unrelated to the shared IRQ logic and it looks useless since it's
> > easily to deduce it from the function name below.
> >
> >
> > > static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq, void *arg)
> > > {
> > > struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> > > @@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq, void *arg)
> > > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > }
> > > +/* handles vqs interrupt */
> >
> >
> > So did this.
> >
> >
> > > static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> > > {
> > > struct vring_info *vring = arg;
> > > @@ -37,24 +39,78 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> > > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > }
> > > +/* handls vqs shared interrupt */
> > > +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> > > +{
> > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> > > + struct vring_info *vring;
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > + vring = &vf->vring[i];
> > > + if (vring->cb.callback)
> > > + vf->vring->cb.callback(vring->cb.private);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/* handles a shared interrupt for vqs and config */
> > > +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
>
> shared is not a good name given IRQ_SHARED is not set.
> maybe "common"? "reused"?
>
> > > +{
> > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> > > + u8 isr;
> > > +
> > > + isr = ifc_ioread8(vf->isr);
> >
> >
> > We need to exactly what vp_interrupt do here. Checking against vf->isr first
> > and return IRQ_NONE if it is not set.
>
> no, vf->isr is not set for VQ interrupts.
I actually wonder what's the actual behaviour of IFCVF.
> If need to actually poke
> at the VQ to know.
>
> > Always return IRQ_HANDLED will break the device who shares an irq with
> > IFCVF.
>
>
> It's a MSI, not INT#. So interrupt is not shared as such - it's only
> sharing vector between config and vq.
Right, I thought it was a shared one as virito_pci did.
>
>
> >
> > > + if (isr & VIRTIO_PCI_ISR_CONFIG)
> > > + ifcvf_config_changed(irq, arg);
> > > +
> > > + return ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(irq, arg);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(void *data)
> > > {
> > > pci_free_irq_vectors(data);
> > > }
> > > -static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> > > +static void ifcvf_free_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> > > {
> > > struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > int i;
> > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG) {
> > > + for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> > > + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
> > > + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > + } else {
> > > + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vqs_shared_irq, vf);
> > > + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > - for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> > > - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
> > > - vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> > > +static void ifcvf_free_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > +{
> > > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > +
> > > + /* If the irq is shared by all vqs and the config interrupt,
> > > + * it is already freed in ifcvf_free_vq_irq, so here only
> > > + * need to free config irq when msix_vector_status != MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED
> > > + */
> > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status != MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED) {
> > > + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
> > > + vf->config_irq = -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> > > +{
> > > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
> > > + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, queues);
> > > + ifcvf_free_config_irq(adapter);
> > > ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
> > > }
> > > @@ -86,58 +142,172 @@ static int ifcvf_alloc_vectors(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > -static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > +static int ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > {
> > > struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > - int vector, nvectors, i, ret, irq;
> > > - u16 max_intr;
> > > + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> > > - nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
> > > - if (!(nvectors > 0))
> > > - return nvectors;
> > > + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > + snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n", pci_name(pdev), i);
> > > + vector = i;
> > > + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > > + ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
> > > + vf->vring[i].msix_name,
> > > + &vf->vring[i]);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
> > > + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, i);
> > > + } else {
> > > + vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
> > > + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > - max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
> > > + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > +{
> > > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> > > +
> > > + vector = 0;
> > > + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared vqs interrupt name */
> >
> >
> > I think we can remove this comment since the code is straightforward.
> >
> >
> > > + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-vqs-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev));
> > > + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > > + ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler, 0,
> > > + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
> > > + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> > > + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > +{
> > > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> > > +
> > > + vector = 0;
> > > + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared device interrupt name */
> > > + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-dev-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev));
> > > + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > > + ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler, 0,
> > > + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
> > > - ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, max_intr,
> > > - max_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> > > - if (ret < 0) {
> > > - IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to alloc IRQ vectors\n");
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
> > > + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> > > + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + vf->config_irq = irq;
> > > + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, vector);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int ifcvf_request_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > +{
> > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> > > + ret = ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(adapter);
> > > + else
> > > + ret = ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(adapter);
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int ifcvf_request_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > +{
> > > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > + int config_vector, ret;
> > > +
> > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> > > + /* vector 0 ~ vf->nr_vring for vqs, num vf->nr_vring vector for config interrupt */
> > > + config_vector = vf->nr_vring;
> > > +
> > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> > > + /* vector 0 for vqs and 1 for config interrupt */
> > > + config_vector = 1;
> > > +
> > > snprintf(vf->config_msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-config\n",
> > > pci_name(pdev));
> > > - vector = 0;
> > > - vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > > + vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, config_vector);
> > > ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq,
> > > ifcvf_config_changed, 0,
> > > vf->config_msix_name, vf);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request config irq\n");
> > > + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, vf->nr_vring);
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > - for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > - snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n",
> > > - pci_name(pdev), i);
> > > - vector = i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF;
> > > - irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > > - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > > - ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
> > > - vf->vring[i].msix_name,
> > > - &vf->vring[i]);
> > > - if (ret) {
> > > - IFCVF_ERR(pdev,
> > > - "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
> > > - ifcvf_free_irq(adapter, i);
> > > + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, config_vector);
> > > - return ret;
> > > - }
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > +{
> >
> >
> > As replied above, I think having two modes should be sufficient and the code
> > could be greatly simplified.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>
> Well it is claimed there are platforms where we are short
> on vectors. 3 versus 2 seems a 50% saving. You disagree?
I think we can 2 vectors (a dedicated for config).
Thanks
>
> > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > + int nvectors, ret, max_intr;
> > > - vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
> > > + nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
> > > + if (!(nvectors > 0))
> > > + return nvectors;
> > > +
> > > + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
> > > + max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
> > > + if (nvectors < max_intr)
> > > + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
> > > +
> > > + if (nvectors == 1) {
> > > + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED;
> > > + ret = ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(adapter);
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > }
> > > + ret = ifcvf_request_vq_irq(adapter);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = ifcvf_request_config_irq(adapter);
> > > +
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -441,7 +611,10 @@ static int ifcvf_vdpa_get_vq_irq(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
> > > {
> > > struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev);
> > > - return vf->vring[qid].irq;
> > > + if (vf->vqs_shared_irq < 0)
> > > + return vf->vring[qid].irq;
> > > + else
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > > static struct vdpa_notification_area ifcvf_get_vq_notification(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement shared IRQ feature
[not found] ` <70ee26d4-9553-543a-ccd9-684f468e2704@intel.com>
@ 2022-02-15 3:36 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2022-02-15 3:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhu, Lingshan; +Cc: netdev, virtualization, Michael S. Tsirkin
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 11:29 AM Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/15/2022 11:03 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:18 AM Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/14/2022 10:27 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 06:01:56PM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> >>>> On 2/14/2022 3:19 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>>>> 在 2022/2/3 下午3:27, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
> >>>>>> On some platforms/devices, there may not be enough MSI vector
> >>>>>> slots allocated for virtqueues and config changes. In such a case,
> >>>>>> the interrupt sources(virtqueues, config changes) must share
> >>>>>> an IRQ/vector, to avoid initialization failures, keep
> >>>>>> the device functional.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This commit handles three cases:
> >>>>>> (1) number of the allocated vectors == the number of virtqueues + 1
> >>>>>> (config changes), every virtqueue and the config interrupt has
> >>>>>> a separated vector/IRQ, the best and the most likely case.
> >>>>>> (2) number of the allocated vectors is less than the best case, but
> >>>>>> greater than 1. In this case, all virtqueues share a vector/IRQ,
> >>>>>> the config interrupt has a separated vector/IRQ
> >>>>>> (3) only one vector is allocated, in this case, the virtqueues and
> >>>>>> the config interrupt share a vector/IRQ. The worst and most
> >>>>>> unlikely case.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Otherwise, it needs to fail.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This commit introduces some helper functions:
> >>>>>> ifcvf_set_vq_vector() and ifcvf_set_config_vector() sets virtqueue
> >>>>>> vector and config vector in the device config space, so that
> >>>>>> the device can send interrupt DMA.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This commit adds some fields in struct ifcvf_hw and re-placed
> >>>>>> the existed fields to be aligned with the cacheline.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c | 47 ++++--
> >>>>>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 23 ++-
> >>>>>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 243 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >>>>>> 3 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> >>>>>> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> >>>>>> index 397692ae671c..18dcb63ab1e3 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> >>>>>> @@ -15,6 +15,36 @@ struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct
> >>>>>> ifcvf_hw *hw)
> >>>>>> return container_of(hw, struct ifcvf_adapter, vf);
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>> +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector)
> >>>>>> +{
> >>>>>> + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> >>>>>> + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + ifc_iowrite16(qid, &cfg->queue_select);
> >>>>>> + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> >>>>>> + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) ==
> >>>>>> VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> >>>>>> + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for queue %u\n", qid);
> >>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>> Let's leave this check for the caller, E.g can caller try to assign
> >>>>> NO_VECTOR during uni-nit?
> >>>> ifcvf driver sets NO_VECTOR when call hw_disable(). I am not sure whether I
> >>>> get it,
> > I meant you invent the ifcvf_set_vq_vector() you'd better use that in
> > hw_disable() as well.
> OK
> >
> >>>> Yes we can let the caller check a vq vector, however this may cause more
> >>>> than three levels brackets, may looks ugly.
> > I don't understand here, this is how virito_pci did:
> >
> > /*
> > * vp_modern_queue_vector - set the MSIX vector for a specific virtqueue
> > * @mdev: the modern virtio-pci device
> > * @index: queue index
> > * @vector: the config vector
> > *
> > * Returns the config vector read from the device
> > */
> > u16 vp_modern_queue_vector(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev,
> > u16 index, u16 vector)
> > {
> > struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = mdev->common;
> >
> > vp_iowrite16(index, &cfg->queue_select);
> > vp_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> > /* Flush the write out to device */
> > return vp_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vp_modern_queue_vector);
> I mean if we leave the checks for the caller, it may look like:
> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> + snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n",
> pci_name(pdev), i);
> + vector = i;
> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> + ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
> + vf->vring[i].msix_name,
> + &vf->vring[i]);
> + if (ret) {
> + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request irq for vq
> %d\n", i);
> + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, i);
> + } else {
> + vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
> + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> if (xxxxx) {
> xxxxxxxxxxx;
> }
> + }
> + }
If the brackets are the only concern, you can factor out the per vq
logic into a dedicated function.
Thanks
>
> Too many brackets.
> >
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>> +}
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector)
> >>>>>> +{
> >>>>>> + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> >>>>>> + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> >>>>>> + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->msix_config);
> >>>>>> + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> >>>>>> + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
> >>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>> Similar question as above.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>> +}
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> static void __iomem *get_cap_addr(struct ifcvf_hw *hw,
> >>>>>> struct virtio_pci_cap *cap)
> >>>>>> {
> >>>>>> @@ -140,6 +170,8 @@ int ifcvf_init_hw(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, struct
> >>>>>> pci_dev *pdev)
> >>>>>> hw->common_cfg, hw->notify_base, hw->isr,
> >>>>>> hw->dev_cfg, hw->notify_off_multiplier);
> >>>>>> + hw->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> return 0;
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>> @@ -321,12 +353,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> >>>>>> ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> >>>>>> cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> >>>>>> - ifc_iowrite16(IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF, &cfg->msix_config);
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>> - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> >>>>>> - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
> >>>>>> - return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> - }
> >>>>>> for (i = 0; i < hw->nr_vring; i++) {
> >>>>>> if (!hw->vring[i].ready)
> >>>>>> @@ -340,15 +366,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> >>>>>> ifc_iowrite64_twopart(hw->vring[i].used, &cfg->queue_used_lo,
> >>>>>> &cfg->queue_used_hi);
> >>>>>> ifc_iowrite16(hw->vring[i].size, &cfg->queue_size);
> >>>>>> - ifc_iowrite16(i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF,
> >>>>>> &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>> - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) ==
> >>>>>> - VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> >>>>>> - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev,
> >>>>>> - "No msix vector for queue %u\n", i);
> >>>>>> - return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> - }
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>> ifcvf_set_vq_state(hw, i, hw->vring[i].last_avail_idx);
> >>>>>> ifc_iowrite16(1, &cfg->queue_enable);
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> >>>>>> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> >>>>>> index 949b4fb9d554..9cfe088c82e9 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> >>>>>> @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@
> >>>>>> #define IFCVF_QUEUE_ALIGNMENT PAGE_SIZE
> >>>>>> #define IFCVF_QUEUE_MAX 32768
> >>>>>> -#define IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF 0
> >>>>>> -#define IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF 1
> >>>>>> #define IFCVF_PCI_MAX_RESOURCE 6
> >>>>>> #define IFCVF_LM_CFG_SIZE 0x40
> >>>>>> @@ -42,6 +40,13 @@
> >>>>>> #define ifcvf_private_to_vf(adapter) \
> >>>>>> (&((struct ifcvf_adapter *)adapter)->vf)
> >>>>>> +/* all vqs and config interrupt has its own vector */
> >>>>>> +#define MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG 1
> >>>>>> +/* all vqs share a vector, and config interrupt has a separate
> >>>>>> vector */
> >>>>>> +#define MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG 2
> >>>>>> +/* all vqs and config interrupt share a vector */
> >>>>>> +#define MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED 3
> >>>>> I think there's no much value to differ 2 from 3 consider config
> >>>>> interrupt should be rare.
> >>>> IMHO we still need 2 and 3, because MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG means
> >>>> there are at least 2 vectors,
> >>>> the vqs share one vector, config change has its own vector.
> > I want to know the value of having a dedicated vector for config?
> I think a dedicated vector for config changes can help us avoid
> operations on config space when vq interrupt triggered.
> >
> >>>> MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED means three are only one vector, all vqs and config
> >>>> changes need to share this vector.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> static inline u8 ifc_ioread8(u8 __iomem *addr)
> >>>>>> {
> >>>>>> return ioread8(addr);
> >>>>>> @@ -97,25 +102,27 @@ struct ifcvf_hw {
> >>>>>> u8 __iomem *isr;
> >>>>>> /* Live migration */
> >>>>>> u8 __iomem *lm_cfg;
> >>>>>> - u16 nr_vring;
> >>>>> Any reason for moving nv_vring, config_size, and other stuffs?
> >>>> for cacheline alignment.
> >>> maybe a separate patch then.
> >> Sure
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> /* Notification bar number */
> >>>>>> u8 notify_bar;
> >>>>>> + u8 msix_vector_status;
> >>>>>> + /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
> >>>>>> + u32 config_size;
> >>>>>> /* Notificaiton bar address */
> >>>>>> void __iomem *notify_base;
> >>>>>> phys_addr_t notify_base_pa;
> >>>>>> u32 notify_off_multiplier;
> >>>>>> + u32 dev_type;
> >>>>>> u64 req_features;
> >>>>>> u64 hw_features;
> >>>>>> - u32 dev_type;
> >>>>>> struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *common_cfg;
> >>>>>> void __iomem *dev_cfg;
> >>>>>> struct vring_info vring[IFCVF_MAX_QUEUES];
> >>>>>> void __iomem * const *base;
> >>>>>> char config_msix_name[256];
> >>>>>> struct vdpa_callback config_cb;
> >>>>>> - unsigned int config_irq;
> >>>>>> - /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
> >>>>>> - u32 config_size;
> >>>>>> + int config_irq;
> >>>>>> + int vqs_shared_irq;
> >>>>>> + u16 nr_vring;
> >>>>>> };
> >>>>>> struct ifcvf_adapter {
> >>>>>> @@ -160,4 +167,6 @@ int ifcvf_set_vq_state(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16
> >>>>>> qid, u16 num);
> >>>>>> struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> >>>>>> int ifcvf_probed_virtio_net(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> >>>>>> u32 ifcvf_get_config_size(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> >>>>>> +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector);
> >>>>>> +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector);
> >>>>>> #endif /* _IFCVF_H_ */
> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> >>>>>> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> >>>>>> index 44c89ab0b6da..ca414399f040 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> >>>>>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> >>>>>> #define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Intel Corporation"
> >>>>>> #define IFCVF_DRIVER_NAME "ifcvf"
> >>>>>> +/* handles config interrupt */
> >>>>> This seems unrelated to the shared IRQ logic and it looks useless since
> >>>>> it's easily to deduce it from the function name below.
> >>>> OK, do you mean the comments? I can remove these comments.
> > Yes.
> >
> >>>>>> static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq, void *arg)
> >>>>>> {
> >>>>>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> >>>>>> @@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq,
> >>>>>> void *arg)
> >>>>>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>> +/* handles vqs interrupt */
> >>>>> So did this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> >>>>>> {
> >>>>>> struct vring_info *vring = arg;
> >>>>>> @@ -37,24 +39,78 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq,
> >>>>>> void *arg)
> >>>>>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>> +/* handls vqs shared interrupt */
> >>>>>> +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> >>>>>> +{
> >>>>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> >>>>>> + struct vring_info *vring;
> >>>>>> + int i;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> >>>>>> + vring = &vf->vring[i];
> >>>>>> + if (vring->cb.callback)
> >>>>>> + vf->vring->cb.callback(vring->cb.private);
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >>>>>> +}
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +/* handles a shared interrupt for vqs and config */
> >>>>>> +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> >>>>>> +{
> >>>>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> >>>>>> + u8 isr;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + isr = ifc_ioread8(vf->isr);
> >>>>> We need to exactly what vp_interrupt do here. Checking against vf->isr
> >>>>> first and return IRQ_NONE if it is not set.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Always return IRQ_HANDLED will break the device who shares an irq with
> >>>>> IFCVF.
> >>>> as we discussed in another thread(spec inconsistency about ISR), ISR may
> >>>> only works for INTx for now,
> >>>> but VFs don't have INTx, and a VF may not share its vectors with other
> >>>> devices, so I guess it can work
> >>>> and may be our best try for now.
> > Right, I thought you're using shared irq but actually not.
> >
> >>>>>> + if (isr & VIRTIO_PCI_ISR_CONFIG)
> >>>>>> + ifcvf_config_changed(irq, arg);
> > I wonder how ISR works in IFCVF, if ISR doesn't work for MSI, we need
> > to remove the check of isr otherwise we will break config interrupt?
> >
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + return ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(irq, arg);
> >>>>>> +}
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> static void ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(void *data)
> >>>>>> {
> >>>>>> pci_free_irq_vectors(data);
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>> -static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> >>>>>> +static void ifcvf_free_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int
> >>>>>> queues)
> >>>>>> {
> >>>>>> struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> >>>>>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> >>>>>> int i;
> >>>>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG) {
> >>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> >>>>>> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
> >>>>>> + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> + } else {
> >>>>>> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vqs_shared_irq, vf);
> >>>>>> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> +}
> >>>>>> - for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> >>>>>> - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
> >>>>>> - vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> +static void ifcvf_free_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>>>> +{
> >>>>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> >>>>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + /* If the irq is shared by all vqs and the config interrupt,
> >>>>>> + * it is already freed in ifcvf_free_vq_irq, so here only
> >>>>>> + * need to free config irq when msix_vector_status !=
> >>>>>> MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED
> >>>>>> + */
> >>>>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status != MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED) {
> >>>>>> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
> >>>>>> + vf->config_irq = -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>> +}
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> >>>>>> +{
> >>>>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> >>>>>> - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
> >>>>>> + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, queues);
> >>>>>> + ifcvf_free_config_irq(adapter);
> >>>>>> ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>> @@ -86,58 +142,172 @@ static int ifcvf_alloc_vectors(struct
> >>>>>> ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>>>> return ret;
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>> -static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>>>> +static int ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>>>> {
> >>>>>> struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> >>>>>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> >>>>>> - int vector, nvectors, i, ret, irq;
> >>>>>> - u16 max_intr;
> >>>>>> + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> >>>>>> - nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
> >>>>>> - if (!(nvectors > 0))
> >>>>>> - return nvectors;
> >>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> >>>>>> + snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n",
> >>>>>> pci_name(pdev), i);
> >>>>>> + vector = i;
> >>>>>> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> >>>>>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> >>>>>> + ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
> >>>>>> + vf->vring[i].msix_name,
> >>>>>> + &vf->vring[i]);
> >>>>>> + if (ret) {
> >>>>>> + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
> >>>>>> + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, i);
> >>>>>> + } else {
> >>>>>> + vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
> >>>>>> + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> - max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
> >>>>>> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>> +}
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +static int ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>>>> +{
> >>>>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> >>>>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> >>>>>> + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + vector = 0;
> >>>>>> + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared vqs
> >>>>>> interrupt name */
> >>>>> I think we can remove this comment since the code is straightforward.
> >>>> sure
> >>>>>> + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256,
> >>>>>> "ifcvf[%s]-vqs-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev));
> >>>>>> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> >>>>>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> >>>>>> + ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler, 0,
> >>>>>> + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
> >>>>>> + if (ret) {
> >>>>>> + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
> >>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> >>>>>> + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +}
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +static int ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>>>> +{
> >>>>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> >>>>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> >>>>>> + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + vector = 0;
> >>>>>> + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared device
> >>>>>> interrupt name */
> >>>>>> + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256,
> >>>>>> "ifcvf[%s]-dev-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev));
> >>>>>> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> >>>>>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> >>>>>> + ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler, 0,
> >>>>>> + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
> >>>>>> + if (ret) {
> >>>>>> + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
> >>>>>> - ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, max_intr,
> >>>>>> - max_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> >>>>>> - if (ret < 0) {
> >>>>>> - IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to alloc IRQ vectors\n");
> >>>>>> return ret;
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
> >>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> >>>>>> + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + vf->config_irq = irq;
> >>>>>> + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, vector);
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +}
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +static int ifcvf_request_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>>>> +{
> >>>>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> >>>>>> + int ret;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> >>>>>> + ret = ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(adapter);
> >>>>>> + else
> >>>>>> + ret = ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(adapter);
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>>> +}
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +static int ifcvf_request_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>>>> +{
> >>>>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> >>>>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> >>>>>> + int config_vector, ret;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED)
> >>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> >>>>>> + /* vector 0 ~ vf->nr_vring for vqs, num vf->nr_vring vector
> >>>>>> for config interrupt */
> >>>>>> + config_vector = vf->nr_vring;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> >>>>>> + /* vector 0 for vqs and 1 for config interrupt */
> >>>>>> + config_vector = 1;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> snprintf(vf->config_msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-config\n",
> >>>>>> pci_name(pdev));
> >>>>>> - vector = 0;
> >>>>>> - vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> >>>>>> + vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, config_vector);
> >>>>>> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq,
> >>>>>> ifcvf_config_changed, 0,
> >>>>>> vf->config_msix_name, vf);
> >>>>>> if (ret) {
> >>>>>> IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request config irq\n");
> >>>>>> + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, vf->nr_vring);
> >>>>>> return ret;
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>> - for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> >>>>>> - snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n",
> >>>>>> - pci_name(pdev), i);
> >>>>>> - vector = i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF;
> >>>>>> - irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> >>>>>> - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> >>>>>> - ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
> >>>>>> - vf->vring[i].msix_name,
> >>>>>> - &vf->vring[i]);
> >>>>>> - if (ret) {
> >>>>>> - IFCVF_ERR(pdev,
> >>>>>> - "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
> >>>>>> - ifcvf_free_irq(adapter, i);
> >>>>>> + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, config_vector);
> >>>>>> - return ret;
> >>>>>> - }
> >>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>> +}
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> >>>>>> +{
> >>>>> As replied above, I think having two modes should be sufficient and the
> >>>>> code could be greatly simplified.
> >>>> Do you mean if we don't get enough vectors, just use only one vector for the
> >>>> vqs and config changes? I guess this
> >>>> only works if ISR work for MSIX as we expects, or we may waste some time in
> >>>> the device config space.
> > Ok, I think I got you here. It's better to document this in the change log.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Zhu Lingshan
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> >>>>>> + int nvectors, ret, max_intr;
> >>>>>> - vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
> >>>>>> + nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
> >>>>>> + if (!(nvectors > 0))
> >>>>>> + return nvectors;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
> >>>>>> + max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
> >>>>>> + if (nvectors < max_intr)
> >>>>>> + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + if (nvectors == 1) {
> >>>>>> + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED;
> >>>>>> + ret = ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(adapter);
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>> + ret = ifcvf_request_vq_irq(adapter);
> >>>>>> + if (ret)
> >>>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + ret = ifcvf_request_config_irq(adapter);
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + if (ret)
> >>>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> return 0;
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>> @@ -441,7 +611,10 @@ static int ifcvf_vdpa_get_vq_irq(struct
> >>>>>> vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
> >>>>>> {
> >>>>>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev);
> >>>>>> - return vf->vring[qid].irq;
> >>>>>> + if (vf->vqs_shared_irq < 0)
> >>>>>> + return vf->vring[qid].irq;
> >>>>>> + else
> >>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>> static struct vdpa_notification_area
> >>>>>> ifcvf_get_vq_notification(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Virtualization mailing list
> >>>>> Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
> >>>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement shared IRQ feature
2022-02-15 3:34 ` Jason Wang
@ 2022-02-15 14:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2022-02-15 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang; +Cc: netdev, Zhu Lingshan, virtualization
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 11:34:31AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:25 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 03:19:25PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > 在 2022/2/3 下午3:27, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
> > > > On some platforms/devices, there may not be enough MSI vector
> > > > slots allocated for virtqueues and config changes. In such a case,
> > > > the interrupt sources(virtqueues, config changes) must share
> > > > an IRQ/vector, to avoid initialization failures, keep
> > > > the device functional.
> > > >
> > > > This commit handles three cases:
> > > > (1) number of the allocated vectors == the number of virtqueues + 1
> > > > (config changes), every virtqueue and the config interrupt has
> > > > a separated vector/IRQ, the best and the most likely case.
> > > > (2) number of the allocated vectors is less than the best case, but
> > > > greater than 1. In this case, all virtqueues share a vector/IRQ,
> > > > the config interrupt has a separated vector/IRQ
> > > > (3) only one vector is allocated, in this case, the virtqueues and
> > > > the config interrupt share a vector/IRQ. The worst and most
> > > > unlikely case.
> > > >
> > > > Otherwise, it needs to fail.
> > > >
> > > > This commit introduces some helper functions:
> > > > ifcvf_set_vq_vector() and ifcvf_set_config_vector() sets virtqueue
> > > > vector and config vector in the device config space, so that
> > > > the device can send interrupt DMA.
> > > >
> > > > This commit adds some fields in struct ifcvf_hw and re-placed
> > > > the existed fields to be aligned with the cacheline.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c | 47 ++++--
> > > > drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 23 ++-
> > > > drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 243 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > > 3 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> > > > index 397692ae671c..18dcb63ab1e3 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
> > > > @@ -15,6 +15,36 @@ struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> > > > return container_of(hw, struct ifcvf_adapter, vf);
> > > > }
> > > > +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> > > > + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> > > > +
> > > > + ifc_iowrite16(qid, &cfg->queue_select);
> > > > + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> > > > + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> > > > + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for queue %u\n", qid);
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > >
> > > Let's leave this check for the caller, E.g can caller try to assign
> > > NO_VECTOR during uni-nit?
> >
> >
> > Hmm I'm not sure I agree. Caller will have to write queue select
> > again, and that's an extra IO, which is a waste.
> > And having function checking itself just seems better contained.
>
> It's as simple as just return what we read here like virtio_pci did:
>
> u16 vp_modern_queue_vector(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev,
> u16 index, u16 vector)
> {
> struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = mdev->common;
>
> vp_iowrite16(index, &cfg->queue_select);
> vp_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> /* Flush the write out to device */
> return vp_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vp_modern_queue_vector);
That would be ok.
> Then the caller can decide to check it with NO_VECTOR if needed.
> Current code will break the callers that want to set NO_VECTOR.
>
> >
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> > > > + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> > > > +
> > > > + cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> > > > + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->msix_config);
> > > > + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> > > > + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > >
> > > Similar question as above.
> > >
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static void __iomem *get_cap_addr(struct ifcvf_hw *hw,
> > > > struct virtio_pci_cap *cap)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -140,6 +170,8 @@ int ifcvf_init_hw(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > > hw->common_cfg, hw->notify_base, hw->isr,
> > > > hw->dev_cfg, hw->notify_off_multiplier);
> > > > + hw->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -321,12 +353,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> > > > ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
> > > > cfg = hw->common_cfg;
> > > > - ifc_iowrite16(IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF, &cfg->msix_config);
> > > > -
> > > > - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> > > > - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
> > > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > > - }
> > > > for (i = 0; i < hw->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > > if (!hw->vring[i].ready)
> > > > @@ -340,15 +366,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
> > > > ifc_iowrite64_twopart(hw->vring[i].used, &cfg->queue_used_lo,
> > > > &cfg->queue_used_hi);
> > > > ifc_iowrite16(hw->vring[i].size, &cfg->queue_size);
> > > > - ifc_iowrite16(i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
> > > > -
> > > > - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) ==
> > > > - VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> > > > - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev,
> > > > - "No msix vector for queue %u\n", i);
> > > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > > - }
> > > > -
> > > > ifcvf_set_vq_state(hw, i, hw->vring[i].last_avail_idx);
> > > > ifc_iowrite16(1, &cfg->queue_enable);
> > > > }
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> > > > index 949b4fb9d554..9cfe088c82e9 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> > > > @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@
> > > > #define IFCVF_QUEUE_ALIGNMENT PAGE_SIZE
> > > > #define IFCVF_QUEUE_MAX 32768
> > > > -#define IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF 0
> > > > -#define IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF 1
> > > > #define IFCVF_PCI_MAX_RESOURCE 6
> > > > #define IFCVF_LM_CFG_SIZE 0x40
> > > > @@ -42,6 +40,13 @@
> > > > #define ifcvf_private_to_vf(adapter) \
> > > > (&((struct ifcvf_adapter *)adapter)->vf)
> > > > +/* all vqs and config interrupt has its own vector */
> > > > +#define MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG 1
> > > > +/* all vqs share a vector, and config interrupt has a separate vector */
> > > > +#define MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG 2
> > > > +/* all vqs and config interrupt share a vector */
> > > > +#define MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED 3
> > >
> > >
> > > I think there's no much value to differ 2 from 3 consider config interrupt
> > > should be rare.
> >
> >
> > Yes but if we do not have a dedicated vector then we need an
> > extra device IO (in fact, a read) on each interrupt.
>
> Ok, right.
>
> >
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > static inline u8 ifc_ioread8(u8 __iomem *addr)
> > > > {
> > > > return ioread8(addr);
> > > > @@ -97,25 +102,27 @@ struct ifcvf_hw {
> > > > u8 __iomem *isr;
> > > > /* Live migration */
> > > > u8 __iomem *lm_cfg;
> > > > - u16 nr_vring;
> > >
> > >
> > > Any reason for moving nv_vring, config_size, and other stuffs?
> > >
> > >
> > > > /* Notification bar number */
> > > > u8 notify_bar;
> > > > + u8 msix_vector_status;
> > > > + /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
> > > > + u32 config_size;
> > > > /* Notificaiton bar address */
> > > > void __iomem *notify_base;
> > > > phys_addr_t notify_base_pa;
> > > > u32 notify_off_multiplier;
> > > > + u32 dev_type;
> > > > u64 req_features;
> > > > u64 hw_features;
> > > > - u32 dev_type;
> > > > struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *common_cfg;
> > > > void __iomem *dev_cfg;
> > > > struct vring_info vring[IFCVF_MAX_QUEUES];
> > > > void __iomem * const *base;
> > > > char config_msix_name[256];
> > > > struct vdpa_callback config_cb;
> > > > - unsigned int config_irq;
> > > > - /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
> > > > - u32 config_size;
> > > > + int config_irq;
> > > > + int vqs_shared_irq;
> > > > + u16 nr_vring;
> > > > };
> > > > struct ifcvf_adapter {
> > > > @@ -160,4 +167,6 @@ int ifcvf_set_vq_state(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, u16 num);
> > > > struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> > > > int ifcvf_probed_virtio_net(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> > > > u32 ifcvf_get_config_size(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
> > > > +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector);
> > > > +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector);
> > > > #endif /* _IFCVF_H_ */
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> > > > index 44c89ab0b6da..ca414399f040 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> > > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > > > #define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Intel Corporation"
> > > > #define IFCVF_DRIVER_NAME "ifcvf"
> > > > +/* handles config interrupt */
> > >
> > >
> > > This seems unrelated to the shared IRQ logic and it looks useless since it's
> > > easily to deduce it from the function name below.
> > >
> > >
> > > > static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq, void *arg)
> > > > {
> > > > struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> > > > @@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq, void *arg)
> > > > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > > }
> > > > +/* handles vqs interrupt */
> > >
> > >
> > > So did this.
> > >
> > >
> > > > static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> > > > {
> > > > struct vring_info *vring = arg;
> > > > @@ -37,24 +39,78 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> > > > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > > }
> > > > +/* handls vqs shared interrupt */
> > > > +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> > > > + struct vring_info *vring;
> > > > + int i;
> > > > +
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > > + vring = &vf->vring[i];
> > > > + if (vring->cb.callback)
> > > > + vf->vring->cb.callback(vring->cb.private);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/* handles a shared interrupt for vqs and config */
> > > > +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> >
> > shared is not a good name given IRQ_SHARED is not set.
> > maybe "common"? "reused"?
> >
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
> > > > + u8 isr;
> > > > +
> > > > + isr = ifc_ioread8(vf->isr);
> > >
> > >
> > > We need to exactly what vp_interrupt do here. Checking against vf->isr first
> > > and return IRQ_NONE if it is not set.
> >
> > no, vf->isr is not set for VQ interrupts.
>
> I actually wonder what's the actual behaviour of IFCVF.
>
> > If need to actually poke
> > at the VQ to know.
> >
> > > Always return IRQ_HANDLED will break the device who shares an irq with
> > > IFCVF.
> >
> >
> > It's a MSI, not INT#. So interrupt is not shared as such - it's only
> > sharing vector between config and vq.
>
> Right, I thought it was a shared one as virito_pci did.
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > + if (isr & VIRTIO_PCI_ISR_CONFIG)
> > > > + ifcvf_config_changed(irq, arg);
> > > > +
> > > > + return ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(irq, arg);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static void ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(void *data)
> > > > {
> > > > pci_free_irq_vectors(data);
> > > > }
> > > > -static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> > > > +static void ifcvf_free_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> > > > {
> > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > > struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > > int i;
> > > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG) {
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> > > > + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
> > > > + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> > > > + }
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vqs_shared_irq, vf);
> > > > + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> > > > + }
> > > > +}
> > > > - for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> > > > - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
> > > > - vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> > > > +static void ifcvf_free_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* If the irq is shared by all vqs and the config interrupt,
> > > > + * it is already freed in ifcvf_free_vq_irq, so here only
> > > > + * need to free config irq when msix_vector_status != MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status != MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED) {
> > > > + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
> > > > + vf->config_irq = -EINVAL;
> > > > }
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > > - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
> > > > + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, queues);
> > > > + ifcvf_free_config_irq(adapter);
> > > > ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -86,58 +142,172 @@ static int ifcvf_alloc_vectors(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > > return ret;
> > > > }
> > > > -static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > > +static int ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > > {
> > > > struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > > struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > > - int vector, nvectors, i, ret, irq;
> > > > - u16 max_intr;
> > > > + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> > > > - nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
> > > > - if (!(nvectors > 0))
> > > > - return nvectors;
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > > + snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n", pci_name(pdev), i);
> > > > + vector = i;
> > > > + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > > > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > > > + ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
> > > > + vf->vring[i].msix_name,
> > > > + &vf->vring[i]);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
> > > > + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, i);
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
> > > > + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > - max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
> > > > + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > > + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> > > > +
> > > > + vector = 0;
> > > > + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared vqs interrupt name */
> > >
> > >
> > > I think we can remove this comment since the code is straightforward.
> > >
> > >
> > > > + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-vqs-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev));
> > > > + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > > > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > > > + ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler, 0,
> > > > + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
> > > > +
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > > + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> > > > + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > > + int i, vector, ret, irq;
> > > > +
> > > > + vector = 0;
> > > > + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared device interrupt name */
> > > > + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-dev-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev));
> > > > + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > > > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > > > + ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler, 0,
> > > > + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
> > > > - ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, max_intr,
> > > > - max_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> > > > - if (ret < 0) {
> > > > - IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to alloc IRQ vectors\n");
> > > > return ret;
> > > > }
> > > > + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > > + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
> > > > + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + vf->config_irq = irq;
> > > > + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, vector);
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int ifcvf_request_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> > > > + ret = ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(adapter);
> > > > + else
> > > > + ret = ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(adapter);
> > > > +
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int ifcvf_request_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> > > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > > + int config_vector, ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED)
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> > > > + /* vector 0 ~ vf->nr_vring for vqs, num vf->nr_vring vector for config interrupt */
> > > > + config_vector = vf->nr_vring;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
> > > > + /* vector 0 for vqs and 1 for config interrupt */
> > > > + config_vector = 1;
> > > > +
> > > > snprintf(vf->config_msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-config\n",
> > > > pci_name(pdev));
> > > > - vector = 0;
> > > > - vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > > > + vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, config_vector);
> > > > ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq,
> > > > ifcvf_config_changed, 0,
> > > > vf->config_msix_name, vf);
> > > > if (ret) {
> > > > IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request config irq\n");
> > > > + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, vf->nr_vring);
> > > > return ret;
> > > > }
> > > > - for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
> > > > - snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n",
> > > > - pci_name(pdev), i);
> > > > - vector = i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF;
> > > > - irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
> > > > - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > > > - ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
> > > > - vf->vring[i].msix_name,
> > > > - &vf->vring[i]);
> > > > - if (ret) {
> > > > - IFCVF_ERR(pdev,
> > > > - "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
> > > > - ifcvf_free_irq(adapter, i);
> > > > + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, config_vector);
> > > > - return ret;
> > > > - }
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> > > > +{
> > >
> > >
> > > As replied above, I think having two modes should be sufficient and the code
> > > could be greatly simplified.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> >
> > Well it is claimed there are platforms where we are short
> > on vectors. 3 versus 2 seems a 50% saving. You disagree?
>
> I think we can 2 vectors (a dedicated for config).
>
> Thanks
>
> >
> > > > + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> > > > + int nvectors, ret, max_intr;
> > > > - vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
> > > > + nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
> > > > + if (!(nvectors > 0))
> > > > + return nvectors;
> > > > +
> > > > + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
> > > > + max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
> > > > + if (nvectors < max_intr)
> > > > + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (nvectors == 1) {
> > > > + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED;
> > > > + ret = ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(adapter);
> > > > +
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > }
> > > > + ret = ifcvf_request_vq_irq(adapter);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = ifcvf_request_config_irq(adapter);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -441,7 +611,10 @@ static int ifcvf_vdpa_get_vq_irq(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
> > > > {
> > > > struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev);
> > > > - return vf->vring[qid].irq;
> > > > + if (vf->vqs_shared_irq < 0)
> > > > + return vf->vring[qid].irq;
> > > > + else
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > }
> > > > static struct vdpa_notification_area ifcvf_get_vq_notification(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
> >
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-15 14:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20220203072735.189716-1-lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
[not found] ` <20220203072735.189716-2-lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
2022-02-14 6:15 ` [PATCH V4 1/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement IO read/write helpers in the header file Jason Wang
[not found] ` <20220203072735.189716-3-lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
2022-02-14 6:26 ` [PATCH V4 2/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement device MSIX vector allocator Jason Wang
[not found] ` <20220203072735.189716-4-lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
2022-02-14 6:28 ` [PATCH V4 3/4] vhost_vdpa: don't setup irq offloading when irq_num < 0 Jason Wang
[not found] ` <20220203072735.189716-5-lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
2022-02-14 7:19 ` [PATCH V4 4/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement shared IRQ feature Jason Wang
2022-02-14 10:01 ` Zhu Lingshan
2022-02-14 14:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <4920887f-0521-9054-035d-32114301ba3a@intel.com>
2022-02-15 3:03 ` Jason Wang
[not found] ` <70ee26d4-9553-543a-ccd9-684f468e2704@intel.com>
2022-02-15 3:36 ` Jason Wang
2022-02-14 14:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-02-15 3:34 ` Jason Wang
2022-02-15 14:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).