virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <olekstysh@gmail.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>, Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@arm.com>,
	Kaly Xin <Kaly.Xin@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@arm.com>,
	Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
	Jiamei Xie <Jiamei.Xie@arm.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] virtio: Solution to restrict memory access under Xen using xen-virtio DMA ops layer
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 04:44:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220415044225-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1649963973-22879-1-git-send-email-olekstysh@gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 10:19:27PM +0300, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>
> 
> Hello all.
> 
> The purpose of this RFC patch series is to add support for restricting memory access under Xen using specific
> grant table based DMA ops layer. Patch series is based on Juergen Gross’ initial work [1] which implies using
> grant references instead of raw guest physical addresses (GPA) for the virtio communications (some kind of
> the software IOMMU).
> 
> The high level idea is to create new Xen’s grant table based DMA ops layer for the guest Linux whose main
> purpose is to provide a special 64-bit DMA address which is formed by using the grant reference (for a page
> to be shared with the backend) with offset and setting the highest address bit (this is for the backend to
> be able to distinguish grant ref based DMA address from normal GPA). For this to work we need the ability
> to allocate contiguous (consecutive) grant references for multi-page allocations. And the backend then needs
> to offer VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM and VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 feature bits (it must support virtio-mmio modern
> transport for 64-bit addresses in the virtqueue).

I'm not enough of a xen expert to review this, and I didn't get
all patches, but I'm very happy to see that approach being
taken. VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM and VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 are
exactly the way to declare not all of memory is accessible.
Thanks!

> Xen's grant mapping mechanism is the secure and safe solution to share pages between domains which proven
> to work and works for years (in the context of traditional Xen PV drivers for example). So far, the foreign
> mapping is used for the virtio backend to map and access guest memory. With the foreign mapping, the backend
> is able to map arbitrary pages from the guest memory (or even from Dom0 memory). And as the result, the malicious
> backend which runs in a non-trusted domain can take advantage of this. Instead, with the grant mapping
> the backend is only allowed to map pages which were explicitly granted by the guest before and nothing else. 
> According to the discussions in various mainline threads this solution would likely be welcome because it
> perfectly fits in the security model Xen provides. 
> 
> What is more, the grant table based solution requires zero changes to the Xen hypervisor itself at least
> with virtio-mmio and DT (in comparison, for example, with "foreign mapping + virtio-iommu" solution which would
> require the whole new complex emulator in hypervisor in addition to new functionality/hypercall to pass IOVA
> from the virtio backend running elsewhere to the hypervisor and translate it to the GPA before mapping into
> P2M or denying the foreign mapping request if no corresponding IOVA-GPA mapping present in the IOMMU page table
> for that particular device). We only need to update toolstack to insert a new "xen,dev-domid" property to
> the virtio-mmio device node when creating a guest device-tree (this is an indicator for the guest to use grants
> and the ID of Xen domain where the corresponding backend resides, it is used as an argument to the grant mapping
> APIs). It worth mentioning that toolstack patch is based on non  upstreamed yet “Virtio support for toolstack
> on Arm” series which is on review now [2].
> 
> Please note the following:
> - Patch series only covers Arm and virtio-mmio (device-tree) for now. To enable the restricted memory access
>   feature on Arm the following options should be set:
>   CONFIG_XEN_VIRTIO = y
>   CONFIG_XEN_HVM_VIRTIO_GRANT = y
> - Some callbacks in xen-virtio DMA ops layer (map_sg/unmap_sg, etc) are not implemented yet as they are not
>   needed/used in the first prototype
> 
> Patch series is rebased on Linux 5.18-rc2 tag and tested on Renesas Salvator-X board + H3 ES3.0 SoC (Arm64)
> with standalone userspace (non-Qemu) virtio-mmio based virtio-disk backend running in Driver domain and Linux
> guest running on existing virtio-blk driver (frontend). No issues were observed. Guest domain 'reboot/destroy'
> use-cases work properly. I have also tested other use-cases such as assigning several virtio block devices
> or a mix of virtio and Xen PV block devices to the guest. 
> 
> 1. Xen changes located at (last patch):
> https://github.com/otyshchenko1/xen/commits/libxl_virtio_next
> 2. Linux changes located at:
> https://github.com/otyshchenko1/linux/commits/virtio_grant5
> 3. virtio-disk changes located at:
> https://github.com/otyshchenko1/virtio-disk/commits/virtio_grant
> 
> Any feedback/help would be highly appreciated.
> 
> [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrlEdaIUDPk
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/1649442065-8332-1-git-send-email-olekstysh@gmail.com/
> 
> Juergen Gross (2):
>   xen/grants: support allocating consecutive grants
>   virtio: add option to restrict memory access under Xen
> 
> Oleksandr Tyshchenko (4):
>   dt-bindings: xen: Add xen,dev-domid property description for
>     xen-virtio layer
>   virtio: Various updates to xen-virtio DMA ops layer
>   arm/xen: Introduce xen_setup_dma_ops()
>   arm/xen: Assign xen-virtio DMA ops for virtio devices in Xen guests
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/virtio/xen,dev-domid.yaml  |  39 +++
>  arch/arm/include/asm/xen/xen-ops.h                 |   1 +
>  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c                          |   5 +-
>  arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c                           |  11 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/xen-ops.h               |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c                        |   5 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/init.c                                 |  15 +
>  arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c                          |   5 -
>  arch/x86/xen/Kconfig                               |   9 +
>  drivers/xen/Kconfig                                |  20 ++
>  drivers/xen/Makefile                               |   1 +
>  drivers/xen/grant-table.c                          | 238 +++++++++++++--
>  drivers/xen/xen-virtio.c                           | 335 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/xen/arm/xen-ops.h                          |  20 ++
>  include/xen/grant_table.h                          |   4 +
>  include/xen/xen-ops.h                              |  13 +
>  16 files changed, 679 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/virtio/xen,dev-domid.yaml
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/xen/xen-ops.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/xen-ops.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/xen/xen-virtio.c
>  create mode 100644 include/xen/arm/xen-ops.h
> 
> -- 
> 2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-15  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1649963973-22879-1-git-send-email-olekstysh@gmail.com>
2022-04-15  7:41 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] virtio: Solution to restrict memory access under Xen using xen-virtio DMA ops layer Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-15  8:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
     [not found] ` <1649963973-22879-4-git-send-email-olekstysh@gmail.com>
2022-04-15 22:01   ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] dt-bindings: xen: Add xen,dev-domid property description for xen-virtio layer Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220415044225-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=Henry.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=Jiamei.Xie@arm.com \
    --cc=Kaly.Xin@arm.com \
    --cc=Wei.Chen@arm.com \
    --cc=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
    --cc=olekstysh@gmail.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).