virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross via Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Oleksandr Tyshchenko <olekstysh@gmail.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] virtio: replace arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access()
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 15:40:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220426134021.11210-3-jgross@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220426134021.11210-1-jgross@suse.com>

Instead of using arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access() together
with CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_RESTRICTED_VIRTIO_MEMORY_ACCESS, replace those
with platform_has() and a new platform feature
PLATFORM_VIRTIO_RESTRICTED_MEM_ACCESS.

Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
---
I've only done a compile test on x86 for now, as I can't test these
changes easily (SEV might be doable for me, but s390 isn't).
---
 arch/s390/Kconfig                  |  1 -
 arch/s390/mm/init.c                | 13 +++----------
 arch/x86/Kconfig                   |  1 -
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c     |  5 ++++-
 arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c          |  6 ------
 arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_identity.c |  5 +++++
 drivers/virtio/Kconfig             |  6 ------
 drivers/virtio/virtio.c            |  5 ++---
 include/linux/platform-feature.h   |  3 ++-
 include/linux/virtio_config.h      |  9 ---------
 10 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
index e084c72104f8..f97a22ae69a8 100644
--- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
@@ -772,7 +772,6 @@ menu "Virtualization"
 config PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_GUEST
 	def_bool n
 	prompt "Protected virtualization guest support"
-	select ARCH_HAS_RESTRICTED_VIRTIO_MEMORY_ACCESS
 	help
 	  Select this option, if you want to be able to run this
 	  kernel as a protected virtualization KVM guest.
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
index 86ffd0d51fd5..8e4fa10c6b12 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 #include <linux/cma.h>
 #include <linux/gfp.h>
 #include <linux/dma-direct.h>
+#include <linux/platform-feature.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
@@ -168,22 +169,14 @@ bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
 	return is_prot_virt_guest();
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_RESTRICTED_VIRTIO_MEMORY_ACCESS
-
-int arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access(void)
-{
-	return is_prot_virt_guest();
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access);
-
-#endif
-
 /* protected virtualization */
 static void pv_init(void)
 {
 	if (!is_prot_virt_guest())
 		return;
 
+	platform_set_feature(PLATFORM_VIRTIO_RESTRICTED_MEM_ACCESS);
+
 	/* make sure bounce buffers are shared */
 	swiotlb_force = SWIOTLB_FORCE;
 	swiotlb_init(1);
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index b0142e01002e..20ac72546ae4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -1515,7 +1515,6 @@ config X86_CPA_STATISTICS
 config X86_MEM_ENCRYPT
 	select ARCH_HAS_FORCE_DMA_UNENCRYPTED
 	select DYNAMIC_PHYSICAL_MASK
-	select ARCH_HAS_RESTRICTED_VIRTIO_MEMORY_ACCESS
 	def_bool n
 
 config AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
index 4b67094215bb..435611d83895 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/i8253.h>
 #include <linux/random.h>
 #include <linux/swiotlb.h>
+#include <linux/platform-feature.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/hypervisor.h>
 #include <asm/hyperv-tlfs.h>
@@ -347,8 +348,10 @@ static void __init ms_hyperv_init_platform(void)
 #endif
 		/* Isolation VMs are unenlightened SEV-based VMs, thus this check: */
 		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT)) {
-			if (hv_get_isolation_type() != HV_ISOLATION_TYPE_NONE)
+			if (hv_get_isolation_type() != HV_ISOLATION_TYPE_NONE) {
 				cc_set_vendor(CC_VENDOR_HYPERV);
+				platform_set_feature(PLATFORM_VIRTIO_RESTRICTED_MEM_ACCESS);
+			}
 		}
 	}
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
index 50d209939c66..9b6a7c98b2b1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
@@ -76,9 +76,3 @@ void __init mem_encrypt_init(void)
 
 	print_mem_encrypt_feature_info();
 }
-
-int arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access(void)
-{
-	return cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_identity.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_identity.c
index b43bc24d2bb6..6043ba6cd17d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_identity.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_identity.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
 #include <linux/cc_platform.h>
+#include <linux/platform-feature.h>
 
 #include <asm/setup.h>
 #include <asm/sections.h>
@@ -566,6 +567,10 @@ void __init sme_enable(struct boot_params *bp)
 	} else {
 		/* SEV state cannot be controlled by a command line option */
 		sme_me_mask = me_mask;
+
+		/* Set restricted memory access for virtio. */
+		platform_set_feature(PLATFORM_VIRTIO_RESTRICTED_MEM_ACCESS);
+
 		goto out;
 	}
 
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/Kconfig b/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
index b5adf6abd241..a6dc8b5846fe 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
@@ -6,12 +6,6 @@ config VIRTIO
 	  bus, such as CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI, CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO, CONFIG_RPMSG
 	  or CONFIG_S390_GUEST.
 
-config ARCH_HAS_RESTRICTED_VIRTIO_MEMORY_ACCESS
-	bool
-	help
-	  This option is selected if the architecture may need to enforce
-	  VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM
-
 config VIRTIO_PCI_LIB
 	tristate
 	help
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
index 22f15f444f75..371e16b18381 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/idr.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform-feature.h>
 #include <uapi/linux/virtio_ids.h>
 
 /* Unique numbering for virtio devices. */
@@ -170,12 +171,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_add_status);
 static int virtio_features_ok(struct virtio_device *dev)
 {
 	unsigned status;
-	int ret;
 
 	might_sleep();
 
-	ret = arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access();
-	if (ret) {
+	if (platform_has(PLATFORM_VIRTIO_RESTRICTED_MEM_ACCESS)) {
 		if (!virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
 			dev_warn(&dev->dev,
 				 "device must provide VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1\n");
diff --git a/include/linux/platform-feature.h b/include/linux/platform-feature.h
index df393d502a4f..34b649aaa1da 100644
--- a/include/linux/platform-feature.h
+++ b/include/linux/platform-feature.h
@@ -6,7 +6,8 @@
 #include <asm/platform-feature.h>
 
 /* The platform features are starting with the architecture specific ones. */
-#define PLATFORM_FEAT_N				(0 + PLATFORM_ARCH_FEAT_N)
+#define PLATFORM_VIRTIO_RESTRICTED_MEM_ACCESS	0
+#define PLATFORM_FEAT_N				(1 + PLATFORM_ARCH_FEAT_N)
 
 #define PLATFORM_FEAT_ARRAY_SZ	BITS_TO_LONGS(PLATFORM_FEAT_N)
 extern unsigned long platform_features[PLATFORM_FEAT_ARRAY_SZ];
diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
index b341dd62aa4d..79498298519d 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
@@ -559,13 +559,4 @@ static inline void virtio_cwrite64(struct virtio_device *vdev,
 		_r;							\
 	})
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_RESTRICTED_VIRTIO_MEMORY_ACCESS
-int arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access(void);
-#else
-static inline int arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access(void)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_RESTRICTED_VIRTIO_MEMORY_ACCESS */
-
 #endif /* _LINUX_VIRTIO_CONFIG_H */
-- 
2.34.1

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-26 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-26 13:40 [PATCH 0/2] kernel: add new infrastructure for platform_has() support Juergen Gross via Virtualization
2022-04-26 13:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] kernel: add platform_has() infrastructure Juergen Gross via Virtualization
2022-04-26 17:31   ` Borislav Petkov
     [not found]     ` <YmhNxnHMe/of4rDD@osiris>
2022-04-26 20:09       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-27  6:20     ` Juergen Gross via Virtualization
2022-04-26 13:40 ` Juergen Gross via Virtualization [this message]
2022-04-26 17:35   ` [PATCH 2/2] virtio: replace arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access() Borislav Petkov
2022-04-27  6:37     ` Juergen Gross via Virtualization
2022-04-27 12:28       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-27 12:37         ` Juergen Gross via Virtualization
2022-04-27 14:09           ` Tom Lendacky via Virtualization
2022-04-27 14:14             ` Juergen Gross via Virtualization
     [not found]     ` <YmhNNrLW+tM2gnZB@osiris>
2022-04-27  6:40       ` Juergen Gross via Virtualization
2022-04-27 12:26         ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-27 12:45           ` Juergen Gross via Virtualization

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220426134021.11210-3-jgross@suse.com \
    --to=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=olekstysh@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).