Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] virtio_test: enable indirection feature

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 10:44:09AM +0800, Guo Zhi wrote:
> Prior implementation don't use indirection feature because there is only
> one descriptor for every io event, actually prior implementation don't
> support indirection because vhost can't translate and find the indirect
> descriptors. This commit enable virtio_test malloc indirect descriptors
> in a indirect buffer and map this buffer to vhost, thus resolve this
> problem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guo Zhi <qtxuning1999@sjtu.edu.cn>
> ---
>  tools/virtio/virtio_test.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/virtio/virtio_test.c b/tools/virtio/virtio_test.c
> index 363695b33..dca408a5c 100644
> --- a/tools/virtio/virtio_test.c
> +++ b/tools/virtio/virtio_test.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
>  #define RINGSIZE   256
>  #define TEST_BUF_NUM 0x100000
>  #define BUF_SIZE   1024
> -/* Unused */
> +#define INDIRECTS_SIZE   (RINGSIZE * sizeof(struct vring_desc) * 8)
>  void *__kmalloc_fake, *__kfree_ignore_start, *__kfree_ignore_end;
>  
>  struct vq_info {
> @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ struct vdev_info {
>  	int nvqs;
>  	void *buf;
>  	size_t buf_size;
> +	void *indirects;
> +	size_t indirects_size;

What are these exactly?

>  	struct vhost_memory *mem;
>  };
>  
> @@ -131,6 +133,8 @@ static void vq_info_add(struct vdev_info *dev, int num)
>  static void vdev_info_init(struct vdev_info* dev, unsigned long long features)
>  {
>  	int r;
> +	int nregions = 2;
> +
>  	memset(dev, 0, sizeof *dev);
>  	dev->vdev.features = features;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vdev.vqs);
> @@ -138,19 +142,25 @@ static void vdev_info_init(struct vdev_info* dev, unsigned long long features)
>  	dev->buf_size = BUF_SIZE;
>  	dev->buf = malloc(dev->buf_size);
>  	assert(dev->buf);
> -        dev->control = open("/dev/vhost-test", O_RDWR);
> +	dev->indirects_size = INDIRECTS_SIZE;
> +	dev->indirects = malloc(dev->indirects_size);
> +	assert(dev->indirects);
> +	dev->control = open("/dev/vhost-test", O_RDWR);
>  	assert(dev->control >= 0);
>  	r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_OWNER, NULL);
>  	assert(r >= 0);
>  	dev->mem = malloc(offsetof(struct vhost_memory, regions) +
> -			  sizeof dev->mem->regions[0]);
> +			(sizeof(dev->mem->regions[0])) * nregions);
>  	assert(dev->mem);
>  	memset(dev->mem, 0, offsetof(struct vhost_memory, regions) +
> -                          sizeof dev->mem->regions[0]);
> -	dev->mem->nregions = 1;
> +			(sizeof(dev->mem->regions[0])) * nregions);
> +	dev->mem->nregions = nregions;
>  	dev->mem->regions[0].guest_phys_addr = (long)dev->buf;
>  	dev->mem->regions[0].userspace_addr = (long)dev->buf;
>  	dev->mem->regions[0].memory_size = dev->buf_size;
> +	dev->mem->regions[1].guest_phys_addr = (long)dev->indirects;
> +	dev->mem->regions[1].userspace_addr = (long)dev->indirects;
> +	dev->mem->regions[1].memory_size = dev->indirects_size;
>  	r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_MEM_TABLE, dev->mem);
>  	assert(r >= 0);
>  }
> @@ -170,6 +180,19 @@ static void wait_for_interrupt(struct vdev_info *dev)
>  		}
>  }
>  
> +static int test_virtqueue_add_outbuf(struct virtqueue *vq,
> +				     struct scatterlist *sg, unsigned int num,
> +				     void *data, void *indirects)
> +{
> +	int r;
> +
> +	__kmalloc_fake = indirects;
> +	r = virtqueue_add_outbuf(vq, sg, num, data,
> +				 GFP_ATOMIC);
> +	__kmalloc_fake = NULL;
> +	return r;
> +}
> +

Quite a hack. Please add comments with documentation. Also - no way to
avoid hacks?

>  static void run_test(struct vdev_info *dev, struct vq_info *vq,
>  		     bool delayed, int batch, int reset_n, int bufs)
>  {
> @@ -181,6 +204,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vdev_info *dev, struct vq_info *vq,
>  	unsigned len;
>  	long long spurious = 0;
>  	const bool random_batch = batch == RANDOM_BATCH;
> +	void *indirects;
>  
>  	r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_TEST_RUN, &test);
>  	assert(r >= 0);
> @@ -188,10 +212,15 @@ static void run_test(struct vdev_info *dev, struct vq_info *vq,
>  		next_reset = INT_MAX;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Don't kfree indirects. */
> +	__kfree_ignore_start = dev->indirects;
> +	__kfree_ignore_end = dev->indirects + dev->indirects_size;
> +
>  	for (;;) {
>  		virtqueue_disable_cb(vq->vq);
>  		completed_before = completed;
>  		started_before = started;
> +		indirects = dev->indirects;
>  		do {
>  			const bool reset = completed > next_reset;
>  			if (random_batch)
> @@ -203,9 +232,13 @@ static void run_test(struct vdev_info *dev, struct vq_info *vq,
>  				sg_init_table(sg, sg_size);
>  				for (int i = 0; i < sg_size; ++i)
>  					sg_set_buf(&sg[i], dev->buf + i, 0x1);
> -				r = virtqueue_add_outbuf(vq->vq, sg, sg_size,
> -							 dev->buf + started,
> -							 GFP_ATOMIC);
> +
> +				// use indirects buffer repeatedly


C style comments please.

> +				if (indirects + sg_size * sizeof(struct vring_desc) >
> +						dev->indirects + dev->indirects_size)
> +					indirects = dev->indirects;
> +				r = test_virtqueue_add_outbuf(vq->vq, sg, sg_size,
> +							      dev->buf + started, indirects);
>  				if (unlikely(r != 0)) {
>  					if (r == -ENOSPC &&
>  					    started > started_before)
> @@ -216,6 +249,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vdev_info *dev, struct vq_info *vq,
>  				}
>  
>  				++started;
> +				indirects += sg_size * sizeof(struct vring_desc);
>  			}
>  			if (unlikely(!virtqueue_kick(vq->vq))) {
>  				r = -1;
> -- 
> 2.17.1

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization