From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, gautam.dawar@xilinx.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio-net: add cond_resched() to the command waiting loop
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 03:15:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220905031405-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220905045341.66191-1-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 12:53:41PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Adding cond_resched() to the command waiting loop for a better
> co-operation with the scheduler. This allows to give CPU a breath to
> run other task(workqueue) instead of busy looping when preemption is
> not allowed.
>
> What's more important. This is a must for some vDPA parent to work
> since control virtqueue is emulated via a workqueue for those parents.
>
> Fixes: bda324fd037a ("vdpasim: control virtqueue support")
That's a weird commit to fix. so it fixes the simulator?
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index ece00b84e3a7..169368365d6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -2000,8 +2000,10 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd,
> * into the hypervisor, so the request should be handled immediately.
> */
> while (!virtqueue_get_buf(vi->cvq, &tmp) &&
> - !virtqueue_is_broken(vi->cvq))
> + !virtqueue_is_broken(vi->cvq)) {
> + cond_resched();
> cpu_relax();
> + }
with cond_resched do we still need cpu_relax?
> return vi->ctrl->status == VIRTIO_NET_OK;
> }
> --
> 2.25.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-05 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-05 4:53 [PATCH net] virtio-net: add cond_resched() to the command waiting loop Jason Wang
2022-09-05 7:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2022-09-05 7:49 ` Jason Wang
2022-09-06 10:55 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-07 2:09 ` Jason Wang
2022-09-07 7:07 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-07 7:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-09-08 2:21 ` Jason Wang
2022-09-08 5:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-10-09 5:58 ` Jason Wang
2022-10-10 17:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-10-12 3:19 ` Jason Wang
2022-10-17 7:15 ` Jason Wang
2022-10-17 20:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220905031405-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gautam.dawar@xilinx.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).