Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] virtio-net: introduce and use helper function for guest gso support checks

Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] virtio-net: introduce and use helper function for guest gso support checks

[Jason Wang]

在 2022/9/14 22:49, Gavin Li 写道:
> Probe routine is already several hundred lines.
> Use helper function for guest gso support check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Li <gavinl@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavi Teitz <gavi@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>


Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>


> ---
> changelog:
> v4->v5
> - Addressed comments from Michael S. Tsirkin
> - Remove unnecessary () in return clause
> v1->v2
> - Add new patch
> ---
>   drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 13 +++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index e0e57083d442..f54c7182758f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -3682,6 +3682,14 @@ static int virtnet_validate(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static bool virtnet_check_guest_gso(const struct virtnet_info *vi)
> +{
> +	return virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) ||
> +		virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6) ||
> +		virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN) ||
> +		virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO);
> +}
> +
>   static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>   {
>   	int i, err = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -3777,10 +3785,7 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>   	spin_lock_init(&vi->refill_lock);
>   
>   	/* If we can receive ANY GSO packets, we must allocate large ones. */
> -	if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) ||
> -	    virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6) ||
> -	    virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN) ||
> -	    virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO))
> +	if (virtnet_check_guest_gso(vi))
>   		vi->big_packets = true;
>   
>   	if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF))

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] virtio-net: use mtu size as buffer length for big packets

[Jason Wang]

在 2022/9/14 22:49, Gavin Li 写道:
> Currently add_recvbuf_big() allocates MAX_SKB_FRAGS segments for big
> packets even when GUEST_* offloads are not present on the device.
> However, if guest GSO is not supported, it would be sufficient to
> allocate segments to cover just up the MTU size and no further.
> Allocating the maximum amount of segments results in a large waste of
> buffer space in the queue, which limits the number of packets that can
> be buffered and can result in reduced performance.
>
> Therefore, if guest GSO is not supported, use the MTU to calculate the
> optimal amount of segments required.
>
> Below is the iperf TCP test results over a Mellanox NIC, using vDPA for
> 1 VQ, queue size 1024, before and after the change, with the iperf
> server running over the virtio-net interface.
>
> MTU(Bytes)/Bandwidth (Gbit/s)
>               Before   After
>    1500        22.5     22.4
>    9000        12.8     25.9
>
> And result of queue size 256.
> MTU(Bytes)/Bandwidth (Gbit/s)
>               Before   After
>    9000        2.15     11.9
>
> With this patch no degradation is observed with multiple below tests and
> feature bit combinations. Results are summarized below for q depth of
> 1024. Interface MTU is 1500 if MTU feature is disabled. MTU is set to 9000
> in other tests.
>
> Features/              Bandwidth (Gbit/s)
>                           Before   After
> mtu off                   20.1     20.2
> mtu/indirect on           17.4     17.3
> mtu/indirect/packed on    17.2     17.2
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Li <gavinl@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavi Teitz <gavi@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>


Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>


> ---
> changelog:
> v5->v6
> - Addressed comments from Jason and Michael S. Tsirkin
> - Remove wrong commit log description
> - Rename virtnet_set_big_packets_fields with virtnet_set_big_packets
> - Add more test results for different feature combinations
> v4->v5
> - Addressed comments from Michael S. Tsirkin
> - Improve commit message
> v3->v4
> - Addressed comments from Si-Wei
> - Rename big_packets_sg_num with big_packets_num_skbfrags
> v2->v3
> - Addressed comments from Si-Wei
> - Simplify the condition check to enable the optimization
> v1->v2
> - Addressed comments from Jason, Michael, Si-Wei.
> - Remove the flag of guest GSO support, set sg_num for big packets and
>    use it directly
> - Recalculate sg_num for big packets in virtnet_set_guest_offloads
> - Replace the round up algorithm with DIV_ROUND_UP
> ---
>   drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index f54c7182758f..7106932c6f88 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -225,6 +225,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
>   	/* I like... big packets and I cannot lie! */
>   	bool big_packets;
>   
> +	/* number of sg entries allocated for big packets */
> +	unsigned int big_packets_num_skbfrags;
> +
>   	/* Host will merge rx buffers for big packets (shake it! shake it!) */
>   	bool mergeable_rx_bufs;
>   
> @@ -1331,10 +1334,10 @@ static int add_recvbuf_big(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
>   	char *p;
>   	int i, err, offset;
>   
> -	sg_init_table(rq->sg, MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2);
> +	sg_init_table(rq->sg, vi->big_packets_num_skbfrags + 2);
>   
> -	/* page in rq->sg[MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1] is list tail */
> -	for (i = MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1; i > 1; --i) {
> +	/* page in rq->sg[vi->big_packets_num_skbfrags + 1] is list tail */
> +	for (i = vi->big_packets_num_skbfrags + 1; i > 1; --i) {
>   		first = get_a_page(rq, gfp);
>   		if (!first) {
>   			if (list)
> @@ -1365,7 +1368,7 @@ static int add_recvbuf_big(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
>   
>   	/* chain first in list head */
>   	first->private = (unsigned long)list;
> -	err = virtqueue_add_inbuf(rq->vq, rq->sg, MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2,
> +	err = virtqueue_add_inbuf(rq->vq, rq->sg, vi->big_packets_num_skbfrags + 2,
>   				  first, gfp);
>   	if (err < 0)
>   		give_pages(rq, first);
> @@ -3690,13 +3693,27 @@ static bool virtnet_check_guest_gso(const struct virtnet_info *vi)
>   		virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO);
>   }
>   
> +static void virtnet_set_big_packets(struct virtnet_info *vi, const int mtu)
> +{
> +	bool guest_gso = virtnet_check_guest_gso(vi);
> +
> +	/* If device can receive ANY guest GSO packets, regardless of mtu,
> +	 * allocate packets of maximum size, otherwise limit it to only
> +	 * mtu size worth only.
> +	 */
> +	if (mtu > ETH_DATA_LEN || guest_gso) {
> +		vi->big_packets = true;
> +		vi->big_packets_num_skbfrags = guest_gso ? MAX_SKB_FRAGS : DIV_ROUND_UP(mtu, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>   static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>   {
>   	int i, err = -ENOMEM;
>   	struct net_device *dev;
>   	struct virtnet_info *vi;
>   	u16 max_queue_pairs;
> -	int mtu;
> +	int mtu = 0;
>   
>   	/* Find if host supports multiqueue/rss virtio_net device */
>   	max_queue_pairs = 1;
> @@ -3784,10 +3801,6 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>   	INIT_WORK(&vi->config_work, virtnet_config_changed_work);
>   	spin_lock_init(&vi->refill_lock);
>   
> -	/* If we can receive ANY GSO packets, we must allocate large ones. */
> -	if (virtnet_check_guest_gso(vi))
> -		vi->big_packets = true;
> -
>   	if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF))
>   		vi->mergeable_rx_bufs = true;
>   
> @@ -3853,12 +3866,10 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>   
>   		dev->mtu = mtu;
>   		dev->max_mtu = mtu;
> -
> -		/* TODO: size buffers correctly in this case. */
> -		if (dev->mtu > ETH_DATA_LEN)
> -			vi->big_packets = true;
>   	}
>   
> +	virtnet_set_big_packets(vi, mtu);
> +
>   	if (vi->any_header_sg)
>   		dev->needed_headroom = vi->hdr_len;
>   

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Improve virtio performance for 9k mtu

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 05:49:09PM +0300, Gavin Li wrote:
> This small series contains two patches that improves virtio netdevice
> performance for 9K mtu when GRO/ guest TSO is disabled.
> 
> Gavin Li (2):
>   virtio-net: introduce and use helper function for guest gso support
>     checks


series:

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

this is net-next material


> ---
> changelog:
> v4->v5
> - Addressed comments from Michael S. Tsirkin
> - Remove unnecessary () in return clause
> v1->v2
> - Add new patch
> ---
>   virtio-net: use mtu size as buffer length for big packets
> ---
> changelog:
> v5->v6
> - Addressed comments from Jason and Michael S. Tsirkin
> - Remove wrong commit log description
> - Rename virtnet_set_big_packets_fields with virtnet_set_big_packets
> - Add more test results for different feature combinations
> v4->v5
> - Addressed comments from Michael S. Tsirkin
> - Improve commit message
> v3->v4
> - Addressed comments from Si-Wei
> - Rename big_packets_sg_num with big_packets_num_skbfrags
> v2->v3
> - Addressed comments from Si-Wei
> - Simplify the condition check to enable the optimization
> v1->v2
> - Addressed comments from Jason, Michael, Si-Wei.
> - Remove the flag of guest GSO support, set sg_num for big packets and
>   use it directly
> - Recalculate sg_num for big packets in virtnet_set_guest_offloads
> - Replace the round up algorithm with DIV_ROUND_UP
> ---
> 
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.31.1

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] Improve virtio performance for 9k mtu

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 02:50:00PM +0800, Gavin Li wrote:
> 
> On 9/14/2022 10:49 PM, Gavin Li wrote:
> > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> > 
> > 
> > This small series contains two patches that improves virtio netdevice
> > performance for 9K mtu when GRO/ guest TSO is disabled.
> > 
> > Gavin Li (2):
> >    virtio-net: introduce and use helper function for guest gso support
> >      checks
> > ---
> > changelog:
> > v4->v5
> > - Addressed comments from Michael S. Tsirkin
> > - Remove unnecessary () in return clause
> > v1->v2
> > - Add new patch
> > ---
> >    virtio-net: use mtu size as buffer length for big packets
> > ---
> > changelog:
> > v5->v6
> > - Addressed comments from Jason and Michael S. Tsirkin
> > - Remove wrong commit log description
> > - Rename virtnet_set_big_packets_fields with virtnet_set_big_packets
> > - Add more test results for different feature combinations
> > v4->v5
> > - Addressed comments from Michael S. Tsirkin
> > - Improve commit message
> > v3->v4
> > - Addressed comments from Si-Wei
> > - Rename big_packets_sg_num with big_packets_num_skbfrags
> > v2->v3
> > - Addressed comments from Si-Wei
> > - Simplify the condition check to enable the optimization
> > v1->v2
> > - Addressed comments from Jason, Michael, Si-Wei.
> > - Remove the flag of guest GSO support, set sg_num for big packets and
> >    use it directly
> > - Recalculate sg_num for big packets in virtnet_set_guest_offloads
> > - Replace the round up algorithm with DIV_ROUND_UP
> > ---
> > 
> >   drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >   1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> Did you get a chance to pull these short series?

Not in net-next yet for some reason, I was hoping it
will get some testing here. I'll put it in my tree
for next for now so it gets tested. Thanks!

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization