From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: "Cindy Lu" <lulu@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Gautam Dawar" <gautam.dawar@xilinx.com>,
"Eli Cohen" <elic@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] virtio_net: notify MAC address change on device initialization
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 05:15:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230124024711-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230123120022.2364889-2-lvivier@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 01:00:22PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> In virtnet_probe(), if the device doesn't provide a MAC address the
> driver assigns a random one.
> As we modify the MAC address we need to notify the device to allow it
> to update all the related information.
>
> The problem can be seen with vDPA and mlx5_vdpa driver as it doesn't
> assign a MAC address by default. The virtio_net device uses a random
> MAC address (we can see it with "ip link"), but we can't ping a net
> namespace from another one using the virtio-vdpa device because the
> new MAC address has not been provided to the hardware.
And then what exactly happens? Does hardware drop the outgoing
or the incoming packets? Pls include in the commit log.
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 7723b2a49d8e..4bdc8286678b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -3800,6 +3800,8 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> eth_hw_addr_set(dev, addr);
> } else {
> eth_hw_addr_random(dev);
> + dev_info(&vdev->dev, "Assigned random MAC address %pM\n",
> + dev->dev_addr);
> }
>
> /* Set up our device-specific information */
> @@ -3956,6 +3958,18 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> pr_debug("virtnet: registered device %s with %d RX and TX vq's\n",
> dev->name, max_queue_pairs);
>
> + /* a random MAC address has been assigned, notify the device */
> + if (!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC) &&
> + virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR)) {
Maybe add a comment explaining that we don't fail probe if
VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR is not there because
many devices work fine without getting MAC explicitly.
> + struct scatterlist sg;
> +
> + sg_init_one(&sg, dev->dev_addr, dev->addr_len);
> + if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC,
> + VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC_ADDR_SET, &sg)) {
> + dev_warn(&vdev->dev, "Failed to update MAC address.\n");
Here, I'm not sure we want to proceed. Is it useful sometimes?
I note that we deny with virtnet_set_mac_address.
> + }
> + }
> +
> return 0;
Also, some code duplication with virtnet_set_mac_address here.
Also:
When using the legacy interface, \field{mac} is driver-writable
which provided a way for drivers to update the MAC without
negotiating VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR.
How about factoring out code in virtnet_set_mac_address
and reusing that?
This will also handle corner cases such as VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY
which are not currently addressed.
> free_unregister_netdev:
> --
> 2.39.0
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-24 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-23 12:00 [PATCH v2 0/1] virtio_net: vdpa: update MAC address when it is generated by virtio-net Laurent Vivier
2023-01-23 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] virtio_net: notify MAC address change on device initialization Laurent Vivier
2023-01-24 10:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-01-24 11:04 ` Laurent Vivier
2023-01-27 11:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-27 12:28 ` Laurent Vivier
2023-01-27 14:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230124024711-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=elic@nvidia.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=gautam.dawar@xilinx.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lulu@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).