From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Albert Huang <huangjie.albert@bytedance.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] virtio_ring: interrupt disable flag updated to vq even with event_triggered is set
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 12:34:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230329122852-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1680090301.6450636-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 07:45:01PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:23:00 +0800, Albert Huang <huangjie.albert@bytedance.com> wrote:
> > From: "huangjie.albert" <huangjie.albert@bytedance.com>
> >
> > in virtio_net, if we disable the napi_tx, when we triger a tx interrupt,
> > the vq->event_triggered will be set to true. It will no longer be set to
> > false. Unless we explicitly call virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed or
> > virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare.
> >
> > If we disable the napi_tx, it will only be called when the tx ring
> > buffer is relatively small.
> >
> > Because event_triggered is true. Therefore, VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT or
> > VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE will not be set. So we update
> > vring_used_event(&vq->split.vring) or vq->packed.vring.driver->off_wrap
> > every time we call virtqueue_get_buf_ctx.This bring more interruptions.
> >
> > To summarize:
> > 1) event_triggered was set to true in vring_interrupt()
> > 2) after this nothing will happen for virtqueue_disable_cb() so
> > VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT is not set in avail_flags_shadow
> > 3) virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split() will still think the cb is enabled
> > then it tries to publish new event
> >
> > To fix:
> > update VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT or VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE to vq
> > when we call virtqueue_disable_cb even the event_triggered is set to true.
> >
> > Tested with iperf:
> > iperf3 tcp stream:
> > vm1 -----------------> vm2
> > vm2 just receives tcp data stream from vm1, and sends the ack to vm1,
> > there are many tx interrupts in vm2.
> > but without event_triggered there are just a few tx interrupts.
> >
> > v2->v3:
> > -update the interrupt disable flag even with the event_triggered is set,
> > -instead of checking whether event_triggered is set in
> > -virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_{packed/split}, will cause the drivers which have
> > -not called virtqueue_{enable/disable}_cb to miss notifications.
> >
> > v3->v4:
> > -remove change for
> > -"if (vq->packed.event_flags_shadow != VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE)"
> > -in virtqueue_disable_cb_packed
> >
> > Fixes: 8d622d21d248 ("virtio: fix up virtio_disable_cb")
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I want to know what the purpose of this patch("virtio: fix up virtio_disable_cb")
> is. I re-review this patch. I didn't understand what the purpose of this
> patches. Does it reduce one write to vring_used_event(&vq->split.vring) ?
>
> Thanks.
Are you asking why I applied 8d622d21d248 ("virtio: fix up
virtio_disable_cb")?
It was a prerequisite to fixing interrupt storms we saw in the field previously.
See Message-ID: <20210413011508-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
for the bug report and Message-ID: <20210413054733.36363-1-mst@redhat.com>
for the original patchset fixing it.
>
> > Signed-off-by: huangjie.albert <huangjie.albert@bytedance.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > index cbeeea1b0439..ec7ab8e04846 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > @@ -931,6 +931,14 @@ static void virtqueue_disable_cb_split(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> >
> > if (!(vq->split.avail_flags_shadow & VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT)) {
> > vq->split.avail_flags_shadow |= VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If device triggered an event already it won't trigger one again:
> > + * no need to disable.
> > + */
> > + if (vq->event_triggered)
> > + return;
> > +
> > if (vq->event)
> > /* TODO: this is a hack. Figure out a cleaner value to write. */
> > vring_used_event(&vq->split.vring) = 0x0;
> > @@ -1761,6 +1769,14 @@ static void virtqueue_disable_cb_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> >
> > if (vq->packed.event_flags_shadow != VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE) {
> > vq->packed.event_flags_shadow = VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If device triggered an event already it won't trigger one again:
> > + * no need to disable.
> > + */
> > + if (vq->event_triggered)
> > + return;
> > +
> > vq->packed.vring.driver->flags =
> > cpu_to_le16(vq->packed.event_flags_shadow);
> > }
> > @@ -2462,12 +2478,6 @@ void virtqueue_disable_cb(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > {
> > struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> >
> > - /* If device triggered an event already it won't trigger one again:
> > - * no need to disable.
> > - */
> > - if (vq->event_triggered)
> > - return;
> > -
> > if (vq->packed_ring)
> > virtqueue_disable_cb_packed(_vq);
> > else
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-29 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230329102300.61000-1-huangjie.albert@bytedance.com>
2023-03-29 11:45 ` [PATCH v4] virtio_ring: interrupt disable flag updated to vq even with event_triggered is set Xuan Zhuo
2023-03-29 16:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-03-29 16:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-03-29 16:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230329122852-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=huangjie.albert@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).