From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, eperezma@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, david.marchand@redhat.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 2/2] virtio-net: sleep instead of busy waiting for cvq command
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 16:54:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230516165043-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230413064027.13267-3-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 02:40:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We used to busy waiting on the cvq command this tends to be
> problematic since there no way for to schedule another process which
> may serve for the control virtqueue. This might be the case when the
> control virtqueue is emulated by software. This patch switches to use
> completion to allow the CPU to sleep instead of busy waiting for the
> cvq command.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes since V1:
> - use completion for simplicity
> - don't try to harden the CVQ command which requires more thought
> Changes since RFC:
> - break the device when timeout
> - get buffer manually since the virtio core check more_used() instead
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 2e56bbf86894..d3eb8fd6c9dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/average.h>
> #include <linux/filter.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/completion.h>
> #include <net/route.h>
> #include <net/xdp.h>
> #include <net/net_failover.h>
> @@ -295,6 +296,8 @@ struct virtnet_info {
>
> /* failover when STANDBY feature enabled */
> struct failover *failover;
> +
> + struct completion completion;
> };
>
> struct padded_vnet_hdr {
> @@ -1709,6 +1712,13 @@ static bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> return !oom;
> }
>
> +static void virtnet_cvq_done(struct virtqueue *cvq)
> +{
> + struct virtnet_info *vi = cvq->vdev->priv;
> +
> + complete(&vi->completion);
> +}
> +
> static void skb_recv_done(struct virtqueue *rvq)
> {
> struct virtnet_info *vi = rvq->vdev->priv;
> @@ -2169,12 +2179,8 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd,
> if (unlikely(!virtqueue_kick(vi->cvq)))
> return vi->ctrl->status == VIRTIO_NET_OK;
>
> - /* Spin for a response, the kick causes an ioport write, trapping
> - * into the hypervisor, so the request should be handled immediately.
> - */
> - while (!virtqueue_get_buf(vi->cvq, &tmp) &&
> - !virtqueue_is_broken(vi->cvq))
> - cpu_relax();
> + wait_for_completion(&vi->completion);
> + virtqueue_get_buf(vi->cvq, &tmp);
>
> return vi->ctrl->status == VIRTIO_NET_OK;
This seems to break surprise removal and other
situations where vq gets broken since callbacks
aren't usually invoked then.
> }
> @@ -3672,7 +3678,7 @@ static int virtnet_find_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>
> /* Parameters for control virtqueue, if any */
> if (vi->has_cvq) {
> - callbacks[total_vqs - 1] = NULL;
> + callbacks[total_vqs - 1] = virtnet_cvq_done;
> names[total_vqs - 1] = "control";
> }
>
There is a cost to this, in that we are burning an extra MSI vector
for the slow path cvq. if device has 3 vectors, suddenly we can't
allocate vectors for rx and tx, big problem.
So I'm afraid we need to pass a new flag that will share
the config changed interrupt and cvq.
> @@ -4122,6 +4128,7 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> if (vi->has_rss || vi->has_rss_hash_report)
> virtnet_init_default_rss(vi);
>
> + init_completion(&vi->completion);
> enable_rx_mode_work(vi);
>
> /* serialize netdev register + virtio_device_ready() with ndo_open() */
> --
> 2.25.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-16 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-13 6:40 [PATCH net-next V2 0/2] virtio-net: don't busy poll for cvq command Jason Wang
2023-04-13 6:40 ` [PATCH net-next V2 1/2] virtio-net: convert rx mode setting to use workqueue Jason Wang
2023-04-13 16:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-14 5:04 ` Jason Wang
2023-04-14 7:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-17 3:40 ` Jason Wang
2023-05-05 3:46 ` Jason Wang
2023-05-10 5:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-15 1:05 ` Jason Wang
2023-05-15 4:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-15 5:13 ` Jason Wang
2023-05-15 10:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-16 2:44 ` Jason Wang
2023-05-16 4:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-16 4:17 ` Jason Wang
2023-05-16 5:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-13 6:40 ` [PATCH net-next V2 2/2] virtio-net: sleep instead of busy waiting for cvq command Jason Wang
2023-04-13 7:27 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-04-14 5:09 ` Jason Wang
2023-04-14 5:10 ` Jason Wang
2023-05-16 20:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-05-17 0:50 ` Jason Wang
2023-04-13 13:02 ` [PATCH net-next V2 0/2] virtio-net: don't busy poll " Maxime Coquelin
2023-04-13 13:05 ` Maxime Coquelin
[not found] ` <20230413070408.630fa731@kernel.org>
2023-04-14 4:53 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230516165043-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).