From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] virtio-net: support modern-transtional devices
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 08:04:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230529075126-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7f98316-9aae-4d5e-b5ff-e9157d5923fe@intel.com>
On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 06:41:54PM +0800, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
>
>
> On 5/29/2023 6:12 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 04:07:42PM +0800, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
>
>
> On 5/29/2023 2:38 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 02:19:36PM +0800, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
>
> On 5/28/2023 7:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 02:15:42AM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
>
> Current virtio-net only probes a device with VIRITO_ID_NET == 1.
>
> For a modern-transtional virtio-net device which has a transtional
> device id 0x1000 and acts as a modern device, current virtio-pci
> modern driver will assign the sub-device-id to its mdev->id.device,
> which may not be 0x1, this sub-device-id is up to the vendor.
>
> That means virtio-net driver doesn't probe a modern-transitonal
> virtio-net with a sub-device-id other than 0x1, which is a bug.
>
> No, the bug is in the device. Legacy linux drivers always looked at
> sub device id (other OSes might differ). So it makes no sense
> for a transitional device to have sub-device-id other than 0x1.
> Don't have time to look at spec but I think you will find it there.
>
> That is true for a software emulated transitional device,
> because there is only "generation" of instance in the hypervisor,
> that allowing it to ensure its sub-device-id always be 0x01,
> and it fits VIRTIO_ID_NET.
>
> However, a vendor may produce multiple generations of transitional
> hardware. The sub-device-id is up to the vendor, and it is the
> only way to for a driver to identify a device, other IDs are all
> fixed as 0x1af4, 0x1000 and 0x8086 for Intel.
>
> That is one of the issues with legacy virtio, yes.
>
>
>
>
> So the sub-device-id has to be unique and differ from others, can not always
> be 0x01.
>
> If you are trying to build a device and want to create a safe way to
> identify it without breaking legacy drivers, then
> VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_VENDOR_CFG has been designed for things like this.
> For example you can have:
>
> struct virtio_pci_vndr_data {
> u8 cap_vndr; /* Generic PCI field: PCI_CAP_ID_VNDR */
> u8 cap_next; /* Generic PCI field: next ptr. */
> u8 cap_len; /* Generic PCI field: capability length */
> u8 cfg_type; /* Identifies the structure. */
> u16 vendor_id; /* Identifies the vendor-specific format. */
> u16 device_generation; /* Device generation */
> };
>
> This can be a solution for sure.
>
> I propose this fix, all changes are for modern-transitional devices in
> modern
> code path, not for legacy nor legacy-transitional.
>
> Thanks
>
> But what good is this fix? If you just want the modern driver to bind
> and ignore legacy just create a modern device, you can play
> with subsystem id and vendor to your heart's content then.
>
> Not sure who but there are some use-cases require
> transnational devices than modern devices,
> I don't like this neither.
>
> If you are using transitional then presumably you want
> legacy drives to bind, they will not bind if subsystem device
> id changes.
>
> well actually it is a transitional device and act as a
> modern device by default, so modern driver will probe.
>
> I think this fix is common and easy, just let virtio-net
> probe transitional device id 0x1000 just like it probes
> modern device id 0x1. This is a once for all fix.
>
> This fix only affects modern-transitional devices in modern code path,
> legacy is untouched.
>
> Thanks
>
> The point of having transitional as opposed to modern is to allow
> legacy drivers. If you don't need legacy just use a non transitional
> device.
>
> Your device is out of spec:
> Transitional devices MUST have the PCI Subsystem Device ID
> matching the Virtio Device ID, as indicated in section \ref{sec:Device Types}.
>
> OK, thanks for point this out. Since the spec says so, I assume transitional is
> almost legacy.
>
> However the spec also says:
> Transitional Device a device supporting both drivers conforming to this
> specification, and allowing legacy drivers.
>
> The transitional devices have their own device id, like 0x1000 indicates it is
> a network device.
>
> Then why the sub-device-id has to be 0x1 in the spec? Is it because we have the
> driver first?
>
> Thanks
yes, for example windows drivers:
PCI\VEN_1AF4&DEV_1000&SUBSYS_0001_INX_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID&REV_00
Rusty originally thought drivers can ignore device id completely, and
just use subsystem id. Something something ... a maze of twisty abstractions ...
but it turned out it does not work e.g. for windows.
>
>
>
> So you will have to explain why the setup you are describing
> makes any sense at all before we consider this a fix.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Other types of devices also have similar issues, like virito-blk.
>
> I propose to fix this problem of modern-transitonal device
> whith this solution, all in the modern code path:
> 1) assign the device id to mdev->id.device
> 2) add transitional device ids in the virtio-net(and others) probe table.
>
> Comments are welcome!
>
> Thanks!
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 1 +
> drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 56ca1d270304..6b45d8602a6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -4250,6 +4250,7 @@ static __maybe_unused int virtnet_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> { VIRTIO_ID_NET, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID },
> + { VIRTIO_TRANS_ID_NET, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID },
> { 0 },
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> index 869cb46bef96..80846e1195ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ int vp_modern_probe(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev)
> /* Transitional devices: use the PCI subsystem device id as
> * virtio device id, same as legacy driver always did.
> */
> - mdev->id.device = pci_dev->subsystem_device;
> + mdev->id.device = pci_dev->device;
> } else {
> /* Modern devices: simply use PCI device id, but start from 0x1040. */
> mdev->id.device = pci_dev->device - 0x1040;
> --
> 2.39.1
>
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-29 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-26 18:15 [RFC] virtio-net: support modern-transtional devices Zhu Lingshan
2023-05-28 11:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-29 6:19 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-05-29 6:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-29 8:07 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-05-29 10:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-05-29 10:41 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-05-29 12:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-05-29 13:13 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-05-29 13:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230529075126-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).