From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>, Bodong Wang <bodong@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] virtio-pci: Fix legacy device flag setting error in probe
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 13:14:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230720131423-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEv1b698NcpZHxpDoNokWH0gEs07D2eYSAjsiF1efhxORw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:27:04AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 11:46 PM Feng Liu <feliu@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > The 'is_legacy' flag is used to differentiate between legacy vs modern
> > device. Currently, it is based on the value of vp_dev->ldev.ioaddr.
> > However, due to the shared memory of the union between struct
> > virtio_pci_legacy_device and struct virtio_pci_modern_device, when
> > virtio_pci_modern_probe modifies the content of struct
> > virtio_pci_modern_device, it affects the content of struct
> > virtio_pci_legacy_device, and ldev.ioaddr is no longer zero, causing
> > the 'is_legacy' flag to be set as true. To resolve issue, when legacy
> > device is probed, mark 'is_legacy' as true, when modern device is
> > probed, keep 'is_legacy' as false.
> >
> > Fixes: 4f0fc22534e3 ("virtio_pci: Optimize virtio_pci_device structure size")
> > Signed-off-by: Feng Liu <feliu@nvidia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 2 --
> > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
> > index a6c86f916dbd..c2524a7207cf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
> > @@ -557,8 +557,6 @@ static int virtio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pci_dev,
> >
> > pci_set_master(pci_dev);
> >
> > - vp_dev->is_legacy = vp_dev->ldev.ioaddr ? true : false;
> > -
> > rc = register_virtio_device(&vp_dev->vdev);
> > reg_dev = vp_dev;
> > if (rc)
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c
> > index 2257f1b3d8ae..d9cbb02b35a1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c
> > @@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ int virtio_pci_legacy_probe(struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev)
> > vp_dev->config_vector = vp_config_vector;
> > vp_dev->setup_vq = setup_vq;
> > vp_dev->del_vq = del_vq;
> > + vp_dev->is_legacy = true;
>
> This seems break force_legacy for modern device:
>
> if (force_legacy) {
> rc = virtio_pci_legacy_probe(vp_dev);
> /* Also try modern mode if we can't map BAR0 (no IO space). */
> if (rc == -ENODEV || rc == -ENOMEM)
> rc = virtio_pci_modern_probe(vp_dev);
>
> Thanks
don't see the breakage here - can you explain a bit more?
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1)
> >
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-20 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-19 15:45 [PATCH v1] virtio-pci: Fix legacy device flag setting error in probe Feng Liu via Virtualization
2023-07-20 2:06 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-07-20 2:27 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-20 2:46 ` Feng Liu via Virtualization
2023-07-20 16:43 ` Feng Liu via Virtualization
2023-07-20 17:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-07-24 13:14 ` Feng Liu via Virtualization
2023-07-25 3:41 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-25 4:18 ` Feng Liu via Virtualization
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230720131423-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=bodong@nvidia.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).