* Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] vsock/test: MSG_PEEK test for SOCK_SEQPACKET
[not found] ` <20230725172912.1659970-5-AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
@ 2023-07-26 8:04 ` Stefano Garzarella
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Garzarella @ 2023-07-26 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arseniy Krasnov
Cc: Bobby Eshleman, kvm, Michael S. Tsirkin, netdev, linux-kernel,
virtualization, oxffffaa, Eric Dumazet, Stefan Hajnoczi, kernel,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, David S. Miller
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 08:29:12PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>This adds MSG_PEEK test for SOCK_SEQPACKET. It works in the same way as
>SOCK_STREAM test, except it also tests MSG_TRUNC flag.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
>---
> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Stefano
>
>diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>index 444a3ff0681f..90718c2fd4ea 100644
>--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>@@ -257,14 +257,19 @@ static void test_stream_multiconn_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
>
> #define MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN 64
>
>-static void test_stream_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
>+static void test_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts,
>+ bool seqpacket)
> {
> unsigned char buf[MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN];
> ssize_t send_size;
> int fd;
> int i;
>
>- fd = vsock_stream_connect(opts->peer_cid, 1234);
>+ if (seqpacket)
>+ fd = vsock_seqpacket_connect(opts->peer_cid, 1234);
>+ else
>+ fd = vsock_stream_connect(opts->peer_cid, 1234);
>+
> if (fd < 0) {
> perror("connect");
> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>@@ -290,7 +295,8 @@ static void test_stream_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
> close(fd);
> }
>
>-static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
>+static void test_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts,
>+ bool seqpacket)
> {
> unsigned char buf_half[MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN / 2];
> unsigned char buf_normal[MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN];
>@@ -298,7 +304,11 @@ static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
> ssize_t res;
> int fd;
>
>- fd = vsock_stream_accept(VMADDR_CID_ANY, 1234, NULL);
>+ if (seqpacket)
>+ fd = vsock_seqpacket_accept(VMADDR_CID_ANY, 1234, NULL);
>+ else
>+ fd = vsock_stream_accept(VMADDR_CID_ANY, 1234, NULL);
>+
> if (fd < 0) {
> perror("accept");
> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>@@ -340,6 +350,21 @@ static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> }
>
>+ if (seqpacket) {
>+ /* This type of socket supports MSG_TRUNC flag,
>+ * so check it with MSG_PEEK. We must get length
>+ * of the message.
>+ */
>+ res = recv(fd, buf_half, sizeof(buf_half), MSG_PEEK |
>+ MSG_TRUNC);
>+ if (res != sizeof(buf_peek)) {
>+ fprintf(stderr,
>+ "recv(2) + MSG_PEEK | MSG_TRUNC, exp %zu, got %zi\n",
>+ sizeof(buf_half), res);
>+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>+ }
>+ }
>+
> res = recv(fd, buf_normal, sizeof(buf_normal), 0);
> if (res != sizeof(buf_normal)) {
> fprintf(stderr, "recv(2), expected %zu, got %zi\n",
>@@ -356,6 +381,16 @@ static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
> close(fd);
> }
>
>+static void test_stream_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
>+{
>+ return test_msg_peek_client(opts, false);
>+}
>+
>+static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
>+{
>+ return test_msg_peek_server(opts, false);
>+}
>+
> #define SOCK_BUF_SIZE (2 * 1024 * 1024)
> #define MAX_MSG_SIZE (32 * 1024)
>
>@@ -1125,6 +1160,16 @@ static void test_stream_virtio_skb_merge_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
> close(fd);
> }
>
>+static void test_seqpacket_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
>+{
>+ return test_msg_peek_client(opts, true);
>+}
>+
>+static void test_seqpacket_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
>+{
>+ return test_msg_peek_server(opts, true);
>+}
>+
> static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
> {
> .name = "SOCK_STREAM connection reset",
>@@ -1200,6 +1245,11 @@ static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
> .run_client = test_stream_virtio_skb_merge_client,
> .run_server = test_stream_virtio_skb_merge_server,
> },
>+ {
>+ .name = "SOCK_SEQPACKET MSG_PEEK",
>+ .run_client = test_seqpacket_msg_peek_client,
>+ .run_server = test_seqpacket_msg_peek_server,
>+ },
> {},
> };
>
>--
>2.25.1
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] virtio/vsock: some updates for MSG_PEEK flag
[not found] <20230725172912.1659970-1-AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
[not found] ` <20230725172912.1659970-5-AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
@ 2023-07-26 10:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2023-07-26 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arseniy Krasnov
Cc: Bobby Eshleman, kvm, netdev, linux-kernel, virtualization,
oxffffaa, Eric Dumazet, Stefan Hajnoczi, kernel, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, David S. Miller
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 08:29:08PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patchset does several things around MSG_PEEK flag support. In
> general words it reworks MSG_PEEK test and adds support for this flag
> in SOCK_SEQPACKET logic. Here is per-patch description:
>
> 1) This is cosmetic change for SOCK_STREAM implementation of MSG_PEEK:
> 1) I think there is no need of "safe" mode walk here as there is no
> "unlink" of skbs inside loop (it is MSG_PEEK mode - we don't change
> queue).
> 2) Nested while loop is removed: in case of MSG_PEEK we just walk
> over skbs and copy data from each one. I guess this nested loop
> even didn't behave as loop - it always executed just for single
> iteration.
>
> 2) This adds MSG_PEEK support for SOCK_SEQPACKET. It could be implemented
> be reworking MSG_PEEK callback for SOCK_STREAM to support SOCK_SEQPACKET
> also, but I think it will be more simple and clear from potential
> bugs to implemented it as separate function thus not mixing logics
> for both types of socket. So I've added it as dedicated function.
>
> 3) This is reworked MSG_PEEK test for SOCK_STREAM. Previous version just
> sent single byte, then tried to read it with MSG_PEEK flag, then read
> it in normal way. New version is more complex: now sender uses buffer
> instead of single byte and this buffer is initialized with random
> values. Receiver tests several things:
> 1) Read empty socket with MSG_PEEK flag.
> 2) Read part of buffer with MSG_PEEK flag.
> 3) Read whole buffer with MSG_PEEK flag, then checks that it is same
> as buffer from 2) (limited by size of buffer from 2) of course).
> 4) Read whole buffer without any flags, then checks that it is same
> as buffer from 3).
>
> 4) This is MSG_PEEK test for SOCK_SEQPACKET. It works in the same way
> as for SOCK_STREAM, except it also checks combination of MSG_TRUNC
> and MSG_PEEK.
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Head is:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=a5a91f546444940f3d75e2edf3c53b4d235f0557
>
> Link to v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230618062451.79980-1-AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru/
> Link to v2:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230719192708.1775162-1-AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru/
>
> Changelog:
> v1 -> v2:
> * Patchset is rebased on the new HEAD of net-next.
> * 0001: R-b tag added.
> * 0003: check return value of 'send()' call.
> v2 -> v3:
> * Patchset is rebased (and tested) on the new HEAD of net-next.
> * 'RFC' tag is replaced with 'net-next'.
> * Small refactoring in 0004:
> '__test_msg_peek_client()' -> 'test_msg_peek_client()'.
> '__test_msg_peek_server()' -> 'test_msg_peek_server()'.
>
> Arseniy Krasnov (4):
> virtio/vsock: rework MSG_PEEK for SOCK_STREAM
> virtio/vsock: support MSG_PEEK for SOCK_SEQPACKET
> vsock/test: rework MSG_PEEK test for SOCK_STREAM
> vsock/test: MSG_PEEK test for SOCK_SEQPACKET
>
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 104 +++++++++++++-----
> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-26 10:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20230725172912.1659970-1-AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
[not found] ` <20230725172912.1659970-5-AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
2023-07-26 8:04 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] vsock/test: MSG_PEEK test for SOCK_SEQPACKET Stefano Garzarella
2023-07-26 10:02 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] virtio/vsock: some updates for MSG_PEEK flag Michael S. Tsirkin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).