Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/virtio: Make use of ops->iotlb_sync_map - Jean-Philippe Brucker

From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/virtio: Make use of ops->iotlb_sync_map
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 08:57:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230922075719.GB1361815@myrica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230919144649.GT13795@ziepe.ca>

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 11:46:49AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 09:15:19AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 05:37:47PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> > > > index 17dcd826f5c2..3649586f0e5c 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> > > > @@ -189,6 +189,12 @@ static int viommu_sync_req(struct viommu_dev *viommu)
> > > >   	int ret;
> > > >   	unsigned long flags;
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * .iotlb_sync_map and .flush_iotlb_all may be called before the viommu
> > > > +	 * is initialized e.g. via iommu_create_device_direct_mappings()
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	if (!viommu)
> > > > +		return 0;
> > > 
> > > Minor nit: I'd be inclined to make that check explicitly in the places where
> > > it definitely is expected, rather than allowing *any* sync to silently do
> > > nothing if called incorrectly. Plus then they could use
> > > vdomain->nr_endpoints for consistency with the equivalent checks elsewhere
> > > (it did take me a moment to figure out how we could get to .iotlb_sync_map
> > > with a NULL viommu without viommu_map_pages() blowing up first...)
> 
> This makes more sense to me
> 
> Ultimately this driver should reach a point where every iommu_domain
> always has a non-null domain->viommu because it will be set during
> alloc.
> 
> But it can still have nr_endpoints == 0, doesn't it make sense to
> avoid sync in this case?
> 
> (btw this driver is missing locking around vdomain->nr_endpoints)

Yes, that's on my list

> 
> > They're not strictly equivalent: this check works around a temporary issue
> > with the IOMMU core, which calls map/unmap before the domain is
> > finalized.
> 
> Where? The above points to iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() but
> it doesn't because the pgsize_bitmap == 0:

__iommu_domain_alloc() sets pgsize_bitmap in this case:

        /*
         * If not already set, assume all sizes by default; the driver
         * may override this later
         */
        if (!domain->pgsize_bitmap)
                domain->pgsize_bitmap = bus->iommu_ops->pgsize_bitmap;

Thanks,
Jean
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization