From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66B88C4332F for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 14:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0078E81BE3; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 14:55:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 0078E81BE3 Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ZV6LE5NH X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id um9TECAeJeX7; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 14:55:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010:104::8cd3:938]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6633E81BB0; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 14:55:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 6633E81BB0 Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F93C0071; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 14:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC973C0032 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 14:55:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C209941715 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 14:55:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org C209941715 Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ZV6LE5NH X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZRZW6PAa6qZC for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 14:55:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B60B41714 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 14:55:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 0B60B41714 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1699368933; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QiSVy1pXRSo5MmppHuXGQ+MP2WzuNcVblg0LwRCEErU=; b=ZV6LE5NHF6XtyNq14cz4dk5vsdwQ32V/IxZxWN1akxO3F/tr16wDwinbgWQZ7zWJYeZ05m 19k9fQY9B9n+jHlWHPX2VJuT66wccK/nKjRz8iPtOy+wx2ntP1WG0TRQ87+cYxznvofgth h/eO5bQ7zQb1MK43QgTooAoWrVIFBk8= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-215-9NQtaDlDP0q8ierohG2M0Q-1; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 09:55:32 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 9NQtaDlDP0q8ierohG2M0Q-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4092164ee4eso36260925e9.3 for ; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 06:55:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699368931; x=1699973731; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=QiSVy1pXRSo5MmppHuXGQ+MP2WzuNcVblg0LwRCEErU=; b=BHAg5H1ATwXHUkesSdWn69OaFRN/1KSef10Jxtnw5wPuvJEAdPGsFql3WUewAJAU/E 6HxP9t9iINtSDZyh+aQ/AGWC6ke9vvbA+mIuASCEWN84/GEeLMXB3ktFh2+5pIYPy2La zAG7cntpTadFG0VlNP2sFl4J734s9Ep0lpcbkUGJoOEOPnHq868YJkDcFCPMokKbDPcD CMp2Ts5AE6pLWtC+QuyxWGh8G4tWOizFpZrYxctmX9R/DnMpZUXRUA2FEG+J1Q0hDJGJ ZQuD171aMtRHGCbLHrNom6ibr0CimiKPM1y2LosKVfpY8nm5McPTFR44qVeVcspXfEba B2iQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxsbeaXWZ5A96uiPeluOoWUeWrYhG5w8for4EMlWyqmfUUF1nbh 76ONbJtNkxyc6JuzXKdK7aWljyUTH0QAOsd1qfLmeiidxl/yrufLZ/PwD5YSytNdsinBsqRjQIT XmgoxmZ1LMd7wMcSnhe20PuG7lpkHjHYz8//cMitXlQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4687:b0:401:bcd9:4871 with SMTP id p7-20020a05600c468700b00401bcd94871mr2498497wmo.21.1699368930996; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 06:55:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHzbMM8W1j1GgoDZM90c2d8/HJ8vQIG2CKZzYqMIhxHMdsZxgqX9hfyV1Tq0rIL8huNSNR6FA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4687:b0:401:bcd9:4871 with SMTP id p7-20020a05600c468700b00401bcd94871mr2498480wmo.21.1699368930620; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 06:55:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from redhat.com ([2a02:14f:1f1:373a:140:63a8:a31c:ab2a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o5-20020a056000010500b00327bf4f2f14sm2556719wrx.88.2023.11.07.06.55.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 07 Nov 2023 06:55:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 09:55:26 -0500 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [RFC v1 0/8] vhost-vdpa: add support for iommufd Message-ID: <20231107094818-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20231103171641.1703146-1-lulu@redhat.com> <20231107022847-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20231107124902.GJ4488@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20231107124902.GJ4488@nvidia.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline Cc: yi.l.liu@intel.com, Cindy Lu , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org X-BeenThere: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux virtualization List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 08:49:02AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > IMHO, this patch series needs to spend more time internally to Red Hat > before it is presented to the community. Just to add an example why I think this "internal review" is a bad idea I seem to recall that someone internal to nvidia at some point attempted to implement this already. The only output from that work we have is that "it's tough" - no pointers to what's tough, no code to study even as a bad path to follow. And while Red Hat might be big, the virt team is rather smaller. -- MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization