From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 32/82] vringh: Refactor intentional wrap-around calculation
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:27:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240123002814.1396804-32-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122235208.work.748-kees@kernel.org>
In an effort to separate intentional arithmetic wrap-around from
unexpected wrap-around, we need to refactor places that depend on this
kind of math. One of the most common code patterns of this is:
VAR + value < VAR
Notably, this is considered "undefined behavior" for signed and pointer
types, which the kernel works around by using the -fno-strict-overflow
option in the build[1] (which used to just be -fwrapv). Regardless, we
want to get the kernel source to the position where we can meaningfully
instrument arithmetic wrap-around conditions and catch them when they
are unexpected, regardless of whether they are signed[2], unsigned[3],
or pointer[4] types.
Refactor open-coded unsigned wrap-around addition test to use
check_add_overflow(), retaining the result for later usage (which removes
the redundant open-coded addition). This paves the way to enabling the
unsigned wrap-around sanitizer[2] in the future.
Link: https://git.kernel.org/linus/68df3755e383e6fecf2354a67b08f92f18536594 [1]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/26 [2]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/27 [3]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/344 [4]
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
drivers/vhost/vringh.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
index 7b8fd977f71c..07442f0a52bd 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
@@ -145,6 +145,8 @@ static inline bool range_check(struct vringh *vrh, u64 addr, size_t *len,
bool (*getrange)(struct vringh *,
u64, struct vringh_range *))
{
+ u64 sum;
+
if (addr < range->start || addr > range->end_incl) {
if (!getrange(vrh, addr, range))
return false;
@@ -152,20 +154,20 @@ static inline bool range_check(struct vringh *vrh, u64 addr, size_t *len,
BUG_ON(addr < range->start || addr > range->end_incl);
/* To end of memory? */
- if (unlikely(addr + *len == 0)) {
+ if (unlikely(U64_MAX - addr == *len)) {
if (range->end_incl == -1ULL)
return true;
goto truncate;
}
/* Otherwise, don't wrap. */
- if (addr + *len < addr) {
+ if (check_add_overflow(addr, *len, &sum)) {
vringh_bad("Wrapping descriptor %zu@0x%llx",
*len, (unsigned long long)addr);
return false;
}
- if (unlikely(addr + *len - 1 > range->end_incl))
+ if (unlikely(sum - 1 > range->end_incl))
goto truncate;
return true;
--
2.34.1
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-23 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240122235208.work.748-kees@kernel.org>
2024-01-23 0:27 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-01-26 19:31 ` [PATCH 32/82] vringh: Refactor intentional wrap-around calculation Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-01-26 19:42 ` Kees Cook
2024-01-23 0:27 ` [PATCH 77/82] virtio: Refactor intentional wrap-around test Kees Cook
2024-01-26 19:33 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240123002814.1396804-32-keescook@chromium.org \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox