From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: mst@redhat.com
Cc: Yi Sun <yi.sun@unisoc.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, yi sun <sunyibuaa@gmail.com>,
jasowang@redhat.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com, hongyu.jin@unisoc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio-blk: Ensure no requests in virtqueues before deleting vqs.
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:09:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240123150924.GD484337@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALpufv0h-sQ4Qfp-Sxd7wME4onMNAMop_gi-np6Dk2R96sba0Q@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4039 bytes --]
Hi Michael,
This could potentially affect other VIRTIO drivers too. Please see
below.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:27:40AM +0800, yi sun wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 11:43 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 07:07:22PM +0800, Yi Sun wrote:
> > > Ensure no remaining requests in virtqueues before resetting vdev and
> > > deleting virtqueues. Otherwise these requests will never be completed.
> > > It may cause the system to become unresponsive. So it is better to place
> > > blk_mq_quiesce_queue() in front of virtio_reset_device().
> >
> > QEMU's virtio-blk device implementation completes all requests during
> > device reset. Most device implementations have to do the same to avoid
> > leaving dangling requests in flight across device reset.
> >
> > Which device implementation are you using and why is it safe for the
> > device is simply drop requests across device reset?
> >
> > Stefan
>
> Virtio-blk device implementation completes all requests during device reset, but
> this can only ensure that the device has finished using virtqueue. We should
> also consider the driver's use of virtqueue.
>
> I caught such an example. Before del_vqs, the request had been processed by
> the device, but it had not been processed by the driver. Although I am
> using kernel5.4,
> I think this problem may also occur with the latest version of kernel.
>
> The debug code I added is as follows:
> virtblk_freeze()
> {
> vdev reset();
> quiesce queue();
> if (virtqueue->num_free != 1024) //1024 is the init value.
> BUG_ON(1);
> vdev del_vqs();
> }
>
> BUG_ON triggered the dump, the analysis is as follows:
>
> There is one request left in request_queue.
> crash_arm64> struct request ffffff81f0560000 | grep -e state -e __data_len
> __data_len = 20480,
> state = MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT,
>
> crash_arm64> vring_virtqueue.packed,last_used_idx,broken,vq 0xffffff8086f92900 |
> grep -e num -e used_wrap_counter -e last_used_idx -e broken -e
> num_free -e desc_state -e "desc ="
> num = 1024,
> desc = 0xffffff8085ff8000,
> used_wrap_counter = false,
> desc_state = 0xffffff8085610000,
> last_used_idx = 487,
> broken = false,
> num_free = 1017,
>
> Find desc based on last_used_idx. Through flags, we can know that the request
> has been processed by the device, but it is still in flight state
> because it has not
> had time to run virtblk_done().
> crash_arm> vring_packed_desc ffffff8085ff9e70
> struct vring_packed_desc {
> addr = 10474619192,
> len = 20481,
> id = 667,
> flags = 2
> }
>
> I'm using a closed source virtual machine, so I can't see the source
> code for it,
> but I'm guessing it's similar to qemu.
>
> After the device completes the request, we must also ensure that the driver can
> complete the request in virtblk_done().
>
Okay, I think your approach of waiting for requests before
virtio_device_reset() makes sense. blk_mq_complete_request() is async
(might be deferred to an IPI or softirq) so it's not enough for
virtblk_done() to run before virtio_device_reset() returns. There is no
guarantee that virtblk_request_done() runs before virtio_device_reset()
returns.
A separate issue about virtio_device_reset():
Are you using virtio-mmio? virtio-mmio's vm_reset() doesn't offer the
same guarantees as virtio-pci's reset functions. virtio-pci guarantees
that irqs sent by the device during the reset operation complete and the
irq handlers run before virtio_device_reset() returns. virtio-mmio does
not.
(On top of this, virtio_device_reset() now has
CONFIG_VIRTIO_HARDEN_NOTIFICATION which changes the semantics. Drivers
cannot expect to complete any in-flight requests in
virtio_device_reset() when complied with this config option.)
Other drivers may be affected by these inconsistent
virtio_device_reset() semantics. I haven't audited the code.
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-23 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-22 11:07 [PATCH 0/2] Fix requests loss during virtio-blk device suspend Yi Sun
2024-01-22 11:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_tagset_wait_request_completed() Yi Sun
2024-01-23 18:45 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-23 19:14 ` Keith Busch
2024-01-24 11:22 ` yi sun
2024-01-24 17:17 ` Keith Busch
2024-01-22 11:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] virtio-blk: Ensure no requests in virtqueues before deleting vqs Yi Sun
2024-01-22 15:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2024-01-23 3:27 ` yi sun
2024-01-23 15:09 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2024-01-24 7:38 ` yi sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240123150924.GD484337@fedora \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hongyu.jin@unisoc.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sunyibuaa@gmail.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yi.sun@unisoc.com \
--cc=zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).