From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6916D81AB4; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 18:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706035540; cv=none; b=hBK0ebAOzTm4WvGLzwp0+cepKE+SmXT5X565lKcMNiOcy0PudSHlsIQQJ3mIECHZZG/jUnmseOztNB6m2C01v7B6IPDGdoj9k+fBbzl2xpFLeHq0DSqRi2wRi1bicDt6Nghe1MSgg+kwA5g4FBfYGYZPPKN5dqP/f8acVEFTZQ8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706035540; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9Y3gZLMDAO/ZiqXH+H2JOVRgL+9SRPuL/r8AXWwdHSA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FXUaE1+WufMoDvCotG/h2rTwbCarGP8541YcULF643KPWIhuKs0cZnlv1SbyIhabPn+BqsMvRJO8ogfCUeM77RZr7Lkf0tJ4hMkS7wKI+BcvUkvwnJbET9wovDuz2SIHeWSHe1NFSxYlY9NLyDd6CIsAhaCKvIpOnOIcE3TPasE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=kPO3habK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="kPO3habK" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1706035536; x=1737571536; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=9Y3gZLMDAO/ZiqXH+H2JOVRgL+9SRPuL/r8AXWwdHSA=; b=kPO3habKBzMdMCf8Zm2r1qPT11+SEXqSP/CFeKn7QRsMUM6ooQWn5/uZ W1xCNLj+tQDsPJ1gsDCRh5YKijVyeVkiosc0lISuTslaL0v/DctUZfUKI G3utlacW8hs6zjy9lSQY58B4yosuxkCtAu2JjTPo17MuG6+TF3D/T3a6v 76fP4Tk9EdhNwc/uEuHuWesJb2U2KKVvi3nSRiTtHDJCwMQSe9Eku9xFw ouXcaI71g9sUwErF44eYqI93e43wi1eqqlGXJ/rlwvXxzdQzTzG6sNSKO YdVnu6bwnNandf6ItRgV2Z7Ifc4FPWgpPtwh/98X5nC4q/LRYcEzlRkDV Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10962"; a="8980486" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,215,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="8980486" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2024 10:45:36 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10962"; a="929419840" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,215,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="929419840" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 961aaaa5b03c) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2024 10:45:32 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 961aaaa5b03c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rSLm6-0007br-1O; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 18:45:30 +0000 Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:45:29 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Yi Sun , axboe@kernel.dk, mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.sun@unisoc.com, zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com, hongyu.jin@unisoc.com, sunyibuaa@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_tagset_wait_request_completed() Message-ID: <202401240242.k3K7SkiZ-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240122110722.690223-2-yi.sun@unisoc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: virtualization@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240122110722.690223-2-yi.sun@unisoc.com> Hi Yi, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on axboe-block/for-next] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.8-rc1 next-20240123] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yi-Sun/blk-mq-introduce-blk_mq_tagset_wait_request_completed/20240122-192222 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240122110722.690223-2-yi.sun%40unisoc.com patch subject: [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_tagset_wait_request_completed() config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-002-20240123 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240124/202401240242.k3K7SkiZ-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240124/202401240242.k3K7SkiZ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401240242.k3K7SkiZ-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> block/blk-mq-tag.c:498: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'tagset' not described in 'blk_mq_tagset_wait_request_completed' vim +498 block/blk-mq-tag.c 490 491 /** 492 * blk_mq_tagset_wait_request_completed - Wait for all inflight requests 493 * to become completed. 494 * 495 * Note: This function has to be run after all IO queues are shutdown. 496 */ 497 void blk_mq_tagset_wait_request_completed(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset) > 498 { 499 while (true) { 500 unsigned int count = 0; 501 502 blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(tagset, 503 blk_mq_tagset_count_inflight_rqs, &count); 504 if (!count) 505 break; 506 msleep(20); 507 } 508 } 509 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_tagset_wait_request_completed); 510 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki