From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sgarzare@redhat.com,
syzbot+6c21aeb59d0e82eb2782@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH virt] virt: fix uninit-value in vhost_vsock_dev_open
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:00:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240422130031.GA77895@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240421030606.80385-1-aha310510@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1129 bytes --]
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 12:06:06PM +0900, Jeongjun Park wrote:
> static bool vhost_transport_seqpacket_allow(u32 remote_cid)
> {
> ....
> vsock = vhost_vsock_get(remote_cid);
>
> if (vsock)
> seqpacket_allow = vsock->seqpacket_allow;
> ....
> }
>
> I think this is due to reading a previously created uninitialized
> vsock->seqpacket_allow inside vhost_transport_seqpacket_allow(),
> which is executed by the function pointer present in the if statement.
CCing Arseny, author of commit ced7b713711f ("vhost/vsock: support
SEQPACKET for transport").
Looks like a genuine bug in the commit. vhost_vsock_set_features() sets
seqpacket_allow to true when the feature is negotiated. The assumption
is that the field defaults to false.
The rest of the vhost_vsock.ko code is written to initialize the
vhost_vsock fields, so you could argue seqpacket_allow should just be
explicitly initialized to false.
However, eliminating this class of errors by zeroing seems reasonable in
this code path. vhost_vsock_dev_open() is not performance-critical.
Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-22 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 9:39 [syzbot] [virt?] [net?] KMSAN: uninit-value in vsock_assign_transport (2) syzbot
2024-04-20 8:57 ` [PATCH virt] virt: fix uninit-value in vhost_vsock_dev_open Jeongjun Park
2024-04-20 10:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-04-21 3:06 ` Jeongjun Park
2024-04-22 13:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2024-04-22 14:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-05-05 19:53 ` Arseniy Krasnov
2024-04-22 14:18 ` [syzbot] [virt?] [net?] KMSAN: uninit-value in vsock_assign_transport (2) Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-04-23 1:31 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240422130031.GA77895@fedora \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=aha310510@gmail.com \
--cc=arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+6c21aeb59d0e82eb2782@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).