virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	jasowang@redhat.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
	eperezma@redhat.com, parav@nvidia.com, feliu@nvidia.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH virtio 0/8] virtio_pci_modern: allow parallel admin queue commands execution
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:16:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240624111347-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZnmH-eMBfsPkDpkd@nanopsycho.orion>

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 04:51:37PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 03:55:53PM CEST, mst@redhat.com wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 03:46:19PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 01:23:01PM CEST, mst@redhat.com wrote:
> >> >On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 05:53:52PM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:04:43 +0200, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> wrote:
> >> >> > From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Currently the admin queue command execution is serialized by a lock.
> >> >> > This patchsets lifts this limitation allowing to execute admin queue
> >> >> > commands in parallel. To do that, admin queue processing needs to be
> >> >> > converted from polling to interrupt based completion.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Patches #1-#6 are preparations, making things a bit smoother as well.
> >> >> > Patch #7 implements interrupt based completion for admin queue.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Hi, Jiri
> >> >> 
> >> >> Before this set, I pushed the cvq irq set [1], and the discussion focused on the
> >> >> fact that the newly added irq vector may cause the IO queue to fall back to
> >> >> shared interrupt mode.
> >> >> But it is true that devices implemented according to the specification should
> >> >> not encounter this problem. So what do you think?
> >> 
> >> Wait. Please note that admin queue is only created and used by PF virtio
> >> device. And most probably, this is on hypervisor managing the VFs that
> >> are passed to guest VMs. These VFs does not have admin queue.
> >> 
> >> Therefore, this is hardly comparable to control vq.
> >
> >
> >Well Parav recently posted patches adding admin queue
> >to VFs, with new "self" group type.
> 
> Right, but even so, when device implementation decides to implement and
> enable admin queue, it should also make sure to provide correct amount
> of vectors. My point is, there should not be any breakage in user
> expectation, or am I missing something?


Hmm, I think you are right that cvq is an existing capability
and adminq is newer.

Gimme a couple of days to think all this over, hopefully we'll also see
a new version of the cvq patch, making it easier to see whether they
interact and if so, how.



> 
> >
> >
> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240619171708-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org/
> >> >
> >> >It's true - this can cause guest to run out of vectors for a variety of
> >> >reasons.
> >> >
> >> >First we have guest irqs - I am guessing avq could use IRQF_SHARED ?
> >> 
> >> There is no avq in quest, under normal circumstances. Unless for some
> >> reason somebody passes trough virtio PF into guest.
> >
> >
> >At the moment, but this will change soon.
> >
> >
> >> 
> >> >I am not sure why we don't allow IRQF_SHARED for the config
> >> >interrupt though. So I think addressing this part can be deferred.
> >> >
> >> >Second, we might not have enough msix vectors on the device. Here sharing
> >> >with e.g. cvq and further with config interrupt would make sense.
> >> 
> >> For cvq irq vector, I believe that sharing with config irq makes sense.
> >> Even for admin queue maybe. But again, admin queue is on PF. I don't
> >> think this is a real concern.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> >
> >> >Jiri do you think you can help Heng Qi hammer out a solution for cvq?
> >> >I feel this will work will then benefit in a similar way,
> >> >and having us poll aggressively for cvq but not admin commands
> >> >does not make much sense, right?
> >> >
> >> >> > Patch #8 finally removes the admin queue serialization lock.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Jiri Pirko (8):
> >> >> >   virtio_pci: push out single vq find code to vp_find_one_vq_msix()
> >> >> >   virtio_pci_modern: treat vp_dev->admin_vq.info.vq pointer as static
> >> >> >   virtio: push out code to vp_avq_index()
> >> >> >   virtio: create admin queues alongside other virtqueues
> >> >> >   virtio_pci_modern: create admin queue of queried size
> >> >> >   virtio_pci_modern: pass cmd as an identification token
> >> >> >   virtio_pci_modern: use completion instead of busy loop to wait on
> >> >> >     admin cmd result
> >> >> >   virtio_pci_modern: remove admin queue serialization lock
> >> >> > 
> >> >> >  drivers/virtio/virtio.c            |  28 +----
> >> >> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 109 ++++++++++++++------
> >> >> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h |   9 +-
> >> >> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 160 ++++++++++++-----------------
> >> >> >  include/linux/virtio.h             |   2 +
> >> >> >  include/linux/virtio_config.h      |   2 -
> >> >> >  6 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 160 deletions(-)
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > -- 
> >> >> > 2.45.1
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > 
> >> >
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-24 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-24  9:04 [PATCH virtio 0/8] virtio_pci_modern: allow parallel admin queue commands execution Jiri Pirko
2024-06-24  9:04 ` [PATCH virtio 1/8] virtio_pci: push out single vq find code to vp_find_one_vq_msix() Jiri Pirko
2024-06-24 10:52   ` Heng Qi
2024-06-24 13:11     ` Jiri Pirko
2024-06-24  9:04 ` [PATCH virtio 2/8] virtio_pci_modern: treat vp_dev->admin_vq.info.vq pointer as static Jiri Pirko
2024-06-24  9:04 ` [PATCH virtio 3/8] virtio: push out code to vp_avq_index() Jiri Pirko
2024-06-24  9:04 ` [PATCH virtio 4/8] virtio: create admin queues alongside other virtqueues Jiri Pirko
2024-06-24  9:04 ` [PATCH virtio 5/8] virtio_pci_modern: create admin queue of queried size Jiri Pirko
2024-06-24  9:04 ` [PATCH virtio 6/8] virtio_pci_modern: pass cmd as an identification token Jiri Pirko
2024-06-24  9:04 ` [PATCH virtio 7/8] virtio_pci_modern: use completion instead of busy loop to wait on admin cmd result Jiri Pirko
2024-06-24 11:30   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-24 13:10     ` Jiri Pirko
2024-06-25 11:07     ` Jiri Pirko
2024-06-25 12:53       ` Parav Pandit
2024-06-25 14:29         ` Jiri Pirko
2024-06-24 11:34   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-24 13:10     ` Jiri Pirko
2024-06-24  9:04 ` [PATCH virtio 8/8] virtio_pci_modern: remove admin queue serialization lock Jiri Pirko
2024-06-24  9:53 ` [PATCH virtio 0/8] virtio_pci_modern: allow parallel admin queue commands execution Heng Qi
2024-06-24 11:23   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-24 13:46     ` Jiri Pirko
2024-06-24 13:55       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-24 14:51         ` Jiri Pirko
2024-06-24 15:16           ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2024-06-25  2:11             ` Heng Qi
2024-06-25  6:38               ` Jiri Pirko
2024-06-25  6:41                 ` Parav Pandit
2024-06-25  7:29                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-25  8:01                     ` Jiri Pirko
2024-06-25  7:20               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-25  7:25                 ` Parav Pandit
2024-06-24 15:10     ` Jiri Pirko
2024-06-24 15:23       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-24 15:45         ` Jiri Pirko
2024-06-24 11:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-24 13:09   ` Jiri Pirko
2024-06-24 13:16     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-24 13:36       ` Jiri Pirko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240624111347-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=feliu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=hengqi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).