From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F110A179AA; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719249871; cv=none; b=N4c3V29ju5M+3guamZbakdswhioiscqlbzjpToaAp8L173a2uIxRShrNEDNR/vuF7aZKr+e+YDqjl3yy7L3EuOjb1v0HI+9IkCbb9EcDOI53tX6pN4+GxWU12esfvRwyqfpE2cf3X4QhBPSjK/Xq86odcPBvycs/tQ2kamhwMkI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719249871; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Wvl2MwWd2bNh218wqWUwpSQ56SgdkqJNMfdLUDqfsvw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KgIE9Gr/C6PlCmbr6BYdhzLzog+ReSbr2wv2fBxO4/ZBcAlO2xxP2sPCO9aEW0SeQKinHmE4aN1wHPAI6BSN5E6T2ltiFejzVlOHa5tzvDRN9hxoAh5XvwHE40jYi5AR33wVsISO+gPeOW9MxqLNnAZ6CsipHCg1JwSP738M2iQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id C072868CFE; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 19:24:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 19:24:25 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Keith Busch Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Geert Uytterhoeven , Richard Weinberger , Philipp Reisner , Lars Ellenberg , Christoph =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=F6hmwalder?= , Josef Bacik , Ming Lei , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= , Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , Mikulas Patocka , Song Liu , Yu Kuai , Vineeth Vijayan , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, nbd@other.debian.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Damien Le Moal Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/26] block: move the nonrot flag to queue_limits Message-ID: <20240624172425.GB22044@lst.de> References: <20240617060532.127975-1-hch@lst.de> <20240617060532.127975-15-hch@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: virtualization@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 11:08:16AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 08:04:41AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > -#define blk_queue_nonrot(q) test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT, &(q)->queue_flags) > > +#define blk_queue_nonrot(q) ((q)->limits.features & BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL) > > This is inverted. Should be: > > #define blk_queue_nonrot(q) (!((q)->limits.features & BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL)) Ah yes. And the sysfs attribute doesn't go through the macro and won't show the effect. I'll send a fixup.