* [Patch net] vsock: fix recursive ->recvmsg calls
@ 2024-08-12 2:21 Cong Wang
2024-08-12 9:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-08-15 10:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Cong Wang @ 2024-08-12 2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: bpf, virtualization, Cong Wang, syzbot+bdb4bd87b5e22058e2a4,
Bobby Eshleman, Michael S . Tsirkin, Stefano Garzarella
From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
After a vsock socket has been added to a BPF sockmap, its prot->recvmsg
has been replaced with vsock_bpf_recvmsg(). Thus the following
recursiion could happen:
vsock_bpf_recvmsg()
-> __vsock_recvmsg()
-> vsock_connectible_recvmsg()
-> prot->recvmsg()
-> vsock_bpf_recvmsg() again
We need to fix it by calling the original ->recvmsg() without any BPF
sockmap logic in __vsock_recvmsg().
Fixes: 634f1a7110b4 ("vsock: support sockmap")
Reported-by: syzbot+bdb4bd87b5e22058e2a4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+bdb4bd87b5e22058e2a4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
---
include/net/af_vsock.h | 4 ++++
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
index 535701efc1e5..24d970f7a4fa 100644
--- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
+++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
@@ -230,8 +230,12 @@ struct vsock_tap {
int vsock_add_tap(struct vsock_tap *vt);
int vsock_remove_tap(struct vsock_tap *vt);
void vsock_deliver_tap(struct sk_buff *build_skb(void *opaque), void *opaque);
+int __vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
+ int flags);
int vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
int flags);
+int __vsock_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
+ size_t len, int flags);
int vsock_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
size_t len, int flags);
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 4b040285aa78..0ff9b2dd86ba 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -1270,25 +1270,28 @@ static int vsock_dgram_connect(struct socket *sock,
return err;
}
+int __vsock_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
+ size_t len, int flags)
+{
+ struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
+ struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+
+ return vsk->transport->dgram_dequeue(vsk, msg, len, flags);
+}
+
int vsock_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
size_t len, int flags)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
+ struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
const struct proto *prot;
-#endif
- struct vsock_sock *vsk;
- struct sock *sk;
- sk = sock->sk;
- vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
prot = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot);
if (prot != &vsock_proto)
return prot->recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags, NULL);
#endif
- return vsk->transport->dgram_dequeue(vsk, msg, len, flags);
+ return __vsock_dgram_recvmsg(sock, msg, len, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_dgram_recvmsg);
@@ -2174,15 +2177,12 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
}
int
-vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
- int flags)
+__vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
+ int flags)
{
struct sock *sk;
struct vsock_sock *vsk;
const struct vsock_transport *transport;
-#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
- const struct proto *prot;
-#endif
int err;
sk = sock->sk;
@@ -2233,14 +2233,6 @@ vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
goto out;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
- prot = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot);
- if (prot != &vsock_proto) {
- release_sock(sk);
- return prot->recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags, NULL);
- }
-#endif
-
if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM)
err = __vsock_stream_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags);
else
@@ -2250,6 +2242,22 @@ vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
release_sock(sk);
return err;
}
+
+int
+vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
+ int flags)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
+ struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
+ const struct proto *prot;
+
+ prot = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot);
+ if (prot != &vsock_proto)
+ return prot->recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags, NULL);
+#endif
+
+ return __vsock_connectible_recvmsg(sock, msg, len, flags);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_connectible_recvmsg);
static int vsock_set_rcvlowat(struct sock *sk, int val)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c
index a3c97546ab84..c42c5cc18f32 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c
@@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ static int __vsock_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, int
int err;
if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM || sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET)
- err = vsock_connectible_recvmsg(sock, msg, len, flags);
+ err = __vsock_connectible_recvmsg(sock, msg, len, flags);
else if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_DGRAM)
- err = vsock_dgram_recvmsg(sock, msg, len, flags);
+ err = __vsock_dgram_recvmsg(sock, msg, len, flags);
else
err = -EPROTOTYPE;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [Patch net] vsock: fix recursive ->recvmsg calls
2024-08-12 2:21 [Patch net] vsock: fix recursive ->recvmsg calls Cong Wang
@ 2024-08-12 9:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-08-15 10:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2024-08-12 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cong Wang
Cc: netdev, bpf, virtualization, Cong Wang,
syzbot+bdb4bd87b5e22058e2a4, Bobby Eshleman, Stefano Garzarella
On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 07:21:53PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
>
> After a vsock socket has been added to a BPF sockmap, its prot->recvmsg
> has been replaced with vsock_bpf_recvmsg(). Thus the following
> recursiion could happen:
>
> vsock_bpf_recvmsg()
> -> __vsock_recvmsg()
> -> vsock_connectible_recvmsg()
> -> prot->recvmsg()
> -> vsock_bpf_recvmsg() again
>
> We need to fix it by calling the original ->recvmsg() without any BPF
> sockmap logic in __vsock_recvmsg().
>
> Fixes: 634f1a7110b4 ("vsock: support sockmap")
> Reported-by: syzbot+bdb4bd87b5e22058e2a4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Tested-by: syzbot+bdb4bd87b5e22058e2a4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Cc: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/net/af_vsock.h | 4 ++++
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> index 535701efc1e5..24d970f7a4fa 100644
> --- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
> +++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> @@ -230,8 +230,12 @@ struct vsock_tap {
> int vsock_add_tap(struct vsock_tap *vt);
> int vsock_remove_tap(struct vsock_tap *vt);
> void vsock_deliver_tap(struct sk_buff *build_skb(void *opaque), void *opaque);
> +int __vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
> + int flags);
> int vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
> int flags);
> +int __vsock_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> + size_t len, int flags);
> int vsock_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> size_t len, int flags);
>
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> index 4b040285aa78..0ff9b2dd86ba 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> @@ -1270,25 +1270,28 @@ static int vsock_dgram_connect(struct socket *sock,
> return err;
> }
>
> +int __vsock_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> + size_t len, int flags)
> +{
> + struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> + struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> +
> + return vsk->transport->dgram_dequeue(vsk, msg, len, flags);
> +}
> +
> int vsock_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> size_t len, int flags)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> + struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> const struct proto *prot;
> -#endif
> - struct vsock_sock *vsk;
> - struct sock *sk;
>
> - sk = sock->sk;
> - vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> prot = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot);
> if (prot != &vsock_proto)
> return prot->recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags, NULL);
> #endif
>
> - return vsk->transport->dgram_dequeue(vsk, msg, len, flags);
> + return __vsock_dgram_recvmsg(sock, msg, len, flags);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_dgram_recvmsg);
>
> @@ -2174,15 +2177,12 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
> }
>
> int
> -vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
> - int flags)
> +__vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
> + int flags)
> {
> struct sock *sk;
> struct vsock_sock *vsk;
> const struct vsock_transport *transport;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> - const struct proto *prot;
> -#endif
> int err;
>
> sk = sock->sk;
> @@ -2233,14 +2233,6 @@ vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
> goto out;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> - prot = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot);
> - if (prot != &vsock_proto) {
> - release_sock(sk);
> - return prot->recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags, NULL);
> - }
> -#endif
> -
> if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM)
> err = __vsock_stream_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags);
> else
> @@ -2250,6 +2242,22 @@ vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
> release_sock(sk);
> return err;
> }
> +
> +int
> +vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
> + int flags)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> + struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> + const struct proto *prot;
> +
> + prot = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot);
> + if (prot != &vsock_proto)
> + return prot->recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags, NULL);
> +#endif
> +
> + return __vsock_connectible_recvmsg(sock, msg, len, flags);
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_connectible_recvmsg);
>
> static int vsock_set_rcvlowat(struct sock *sk, int val)
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c
> index a3c97546ab84..c42c5cc18f32 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c
> @@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ static int __vsock_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, int
> int err;
>
> if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM || sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET)
> - err = vsock_connectible_recvmsg(sock, msg, len, flags);
> + err = __vsock_connectible_recvmsg(sock, msg, len, flags);
> else if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_DGRAM)
> - err = vsock_dgram_recvmsg(sock, msg, len, flags);
> + err = __vsock_dgram_recvmsg(sock, msg, len, flags);
> else
> err = -EPROTOTYPE;
>
> --
> 2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [Patch net] vsock: fix recursive ->recvmsg calls
2024-08-12 2:21 [Patch net] vsock: fix recursive ->recvmsg calls Cong Wang
2024-08-12 9:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2024-08-15 10:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2024-08-15 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cong Wang
Cc: netdev, bpf, virtualization, cong.wang,
syzbot+bdb4bd87b5e22058e2a4, bobby.eshleman, mst, sgarzare
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 19:21:53 -0700 you wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
>
> After a vsock socket has been added to a BPF sockmap, its prot->recvmsg
> has been replaced with vsock_bpf_recvmsg(). Thus the following
> recursiion could happen:
>
> vsock_bpf_recvmsg()
> -> __vsock_recvmsg()
> -> vsock_connectible_recvmsg()
> -> prot->recvmsg()
> -> vsock_bpf_recvmsg() again
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] vsock: fix recursive ->recvmsg calls
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/69139d2919dd
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-15 10:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-08-12 2:21 [Patch net] vsock: fix recursive ->recvmsg calls Cong Wang
2024-08-12 9:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-08-15 10:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).